I'm not 'failing to understand' anything.
We all know that the site has issues. Anyone who fails to acknowledge that is a fool.
What you're failing to note is what I just said; i.e., accusations (often via innuendo) and claims are exaggerated to justify demands and 'excuse' chivvying for the site owner to 'do something' or 'fix it or finish it or sell out.' If you'd spend time 'keeping track,' you'd find that many/most of us have acknowledged the problems; but, instead of simply grousing about them and issuing demands of 'fix it or shut it down,' we identify the actual problem from our perspective in the hope that it will help identify the cause, making it easier and more accessible to fix. We don't offer lip service, claiming it's simply a lack of skill/expertise or money (or worse things which have been posted) that's at the root of why it hasn't been completely fixed, often completely ignoring what we've been repeatedly told and warned about for years.
It's the very reason many have said that one either has to accept the site, as it currently is, and 'trust' that the work we've been told is in progress is happening or move elsewhere until it complies with whatever you personally feel is appropriate. It's also the reason I have said If you prefer the other site, by all means, contribute over there. If you think this site isn't working and is doomed, by all means, don't bother to stick around. You see, whatever 'standard' or 'metric' you wish to pull out and/or tout, the bottom line is that a business survives because customers still utilize it. Don't want to patronize the site, that's your choice. What isn't up to you or me is to tell other customers or the business owner what they must do. Neither is it up to you or me to demand the business owner meet whatever metric is being demanded at a given moment as if they aren't aware of 'industry standards.' Short version, if it doesn't meet your vision of an usable or useful website, you vote with your usage. Continuously beating a drum demanding a business owner comply with your, personal sense of utility or some sort of standard simply isn't how Life works.
You see, the discussion in this thread isn't about whether this site isn't working up to snuff. The discussion in this thread is about members projecting their choice of 'acceptability' on to the rest of us and demanding we abide by it.
What far too many are ignoring is the reality that many find this place to still be usable or useful to them, to whatever degree and they are willing to tolerate the deficits, for now, while work is in progress. As I've stated, quite a few times, if our faith in the site and/or Kestryll is misplaced, we'll find out and act accordingly. Put another way, it's not about industry standards regarding website uptime. It's about what members here still feel and see as a sense of 'community.' Every community has its trials and tribulations and if you don't want to be a part of that, then you are acknowledging that you don't wish to be a part of what is involved in being a community.
We all know that the site has issues. Anyone who fails to acknowledge that is a fool.
What you're failing to note is what I just said; i.e., accusations (often via innuendo) and claims are exaggerated to justify demands and 'excuse' chivvying for the site owner to 'do something' or 'fix it or finish it or sell out.' If you'd spend time 'keeping track,' you'd find that many/most of us have acknowledged the problems; but, instead of simply grousing about them and issuing demands of 'fix it or shut it down,' we identify the actual problem from our perspective in the hope that it will help identify the cause, making it easier and more accessible to fix. We don't offer lip service, claiming it's simply a lack of skill/expertise or money (or worse things which have been posted) that's at the root of why it hasn't been completely fixed, often completely ignoring what we've been repeatedly told and warned about for years.
It's the very reason many have said that one either has to accept the site, as it currently is, and 'trust' that the work we've been told is in progress is happening or move elsewhere until it complies with whatever you personally feel is appropriate. It's also the reason I have said If you prefer the other site, by all means, contribute over there. If you think this site isn't working and is doomed, by all means, don't bother to stick around. You see, whatever 'standard' or 'metric' you wish to pull out and/or tout, the bottom line is that a business survives because customers still utilize it. Don't want to patronize the site, that's your choice. What isn't up to you or me is to tell other customers or the business owner what they must do. Neither is it up to you or me to demand the business owner meet whatever metric is being demanded at a given moment as if they aren't aware of 'industry standards.' Short version, if it doesn't meet your vision of an usable or useful website, you vote with your usage. Continuously beating a drum demanding a business owner comply with your, personal sense of utility or some sort of standard simply isn't how Life works.
You see, the discussion in this thread isn't about whether this site isn't working up to snuff. The discussion in this thread is about members projecting their choice of 'acceptability' on to the rest of us and demanding we abide by it.
What far too many are ignoring is the reality that many find this place to still be usable or useful to them, to whatever degree and they are willing to tolerate the deficits, for now, while work is in progress. As I've stated, quite a few times, if our faith in the site and/or Kestryll is misplaced, we'll find out and act accordingly. Put another way, it's not about industry standards regarding website uptime. It's about what members here still feel and see as a sense of 'community.' Every community has its trials and tribulations and if you don't want to be a part of that, then you are acknowledging that you don't wish to be a part of what is involved in being a community.


Comment