Hmmmm.........If I read this correctly, it would appear that I'd inadvertently 'poked the hornets' nest'......or some such......or maybe inadvertently pressed the 'male ego' button. Well, if such is the case, sorry about that, such wasn't my intention.
Maybe, it might have appeared that I was 'challenging the authority' of someone who has a need to appear to be an 'authority figure'........well, if someone got that idea, again, sorry about that, but its nonsense, really.
I do get the impression that some of Mr Stilly's comment was quite needlessly demeaning and adversarial, so 'counter-productive' at best, more in keeping with the Calguns 'OT' tradition, than within this particular little 'nook' of the Calguns world.
Aside from any socio-cultural issue, it would appear that Mr Stilly and I have some minor differences of opinion. Perchance the best reply to that might be, 'very well, let him load his rounds, and I'll load mine'.
Actually, I would suspect that Mr Stilly and I would have relatively few serious, or 'major' differences of opinion, regarding the practical aspects of loading rounds, and some exploration of those differences, if it could be done in a pleasant and constructive manner, might be useful 'background material', for folks who are just getting into handloading.
For the record, I will admit to a personal prejudice (and when I say 'prejudice', call up the image of the creeps with the sheets and pointy hats, of years ago.) regarding certain classes of cheap metrology equipment, particularly dial calipers.
Its only fair that I explain the reason for this prejudice.
Back in the 1970's and 80's, I was involved in a machine business, not much of a business, as businesses go, just a little 'hole in the wall' operation in which we did contract and sub-contract machining, a good bit of which was mil-spec components.
(and, in many instances, we were not allowed to know what it was that we were making parts for......we just got drawings with sections of the title block cut out, and were told 'make it like this'.....known familiarly as 'MIL-TDD-41', or 'make it like the damn drawing, for once')
In addition to answering the phones and doing the invoicing, etc, I had to 'come up on the learning curve' to do mechanical inspection per mil-spec standards. This is back when dial calipers were first becoming popular, a seemingly wonderful replacement for the vernier calipers which had long been the standard equipment.
Needless to say, I had no choice but to learn about maintaining dial calipers and qualifying calibration on them. The best quality Swiss-made ones were quite reliable, if kept clean, but even those could 'jump' if a speck of dirt got into the 'clockwork'. They were surprisingly accurate over their full range, actually, seldom if ever more than .001 off when read on a gage block stack.
Our machine operators often got cheap dial calipers, thought to be 'cost-effective' for open-tolerance work.
An all too usual failure mode was that they would work alright when new, with known but consistent error, but after a bit of use, would become 'erratic', sometimes reading within .001 of nominal, sometimes .003 to .010 off, but unpredictably so. This was usually due to wear in the mechanism, particularly pinion stems, which, unlike the 'watch-work' quality of the Swiss units, would be soft brass.
Some of these cheap dial calipers seemed to wear out surprisingly quickly, whilst others would become a bit 'erratic' but stay within .005 or so. There were quite a few makes of those, made in quite a number of countries, and some cheap ones were surprisingly well made, whilst others could be best described as 'sub-pathetic'.
So.....thats the story......I admit to 'prejudice' about cheap dial calipers, but, damn it all, I well and truly earned that prejudice, from first-hand experience.
The question here, I suppose, is whether they are 'good enough' for the work at hand.
They might be, for a while, until they get some wear, but any cheap measuring tool is a 'false economy', in my opinion.
cheers
Carla
Maybe, it might have appeared that I was 'challenging the authority' of someone who has a need to appear to be an 'authority figure'........well, if someone got that idea, again, sorry about that, but its nonsense, really.
I do get the impression that some of Mr Stilly's comment was quite needlessly demeaning and adversarial, so 'counter-productive' at best, more in keeping with the Calguns 'OT' tradition, than within this particular little 'nook' of the Calguns world.
Aside from any socio-cultural issue, it would appear that Mr Stilly and I have some minor differences of opinion. Perchance the best reply to that might be, 'very well, let him load his rounds, and I'll load mine'.
Actually, I would suspect that Mr Stilly and I would have relatively few serious, or 'major' differences of opinion, regarding the practical aspects of loading rounds, and some exploration of those differences, if it could be done in a pleasant and constructive manner, might be useful 'background material', for folks who are just getting into handloading.
For the record, I will admit to a personal prejudice (and when I say 'prejudice', call up the image of the creeps with the sheets and pointy hats, of years ago.) regarding certain classes of cheap metrology equipment, particularly dial calipers.
Its only fair that I explain the reason for this prejudice.
Back in the 1970's and 80's, I was involved in a machine business, not much of a business, as businesses go, just a little 'hole in the wall' operation in which we did contract and sub-contract machining, a good bit of which was mil-spec components.
(and, in many instances, we were not allowed to know what it was that we were making parts for......we just got drawings with sections of the title block cut out, and were told 'make it like this'.....known familiarly as 'MIL-TDD-41', or 'make it like the damn drawing, for once')
In addition to answering the phones and doing the invoicing, etc, I had to 'come up on the learning curve' to do mechanical inspection per mil-spec standards. This is back when dial calipers were first becoming popular, a seemingly wonderful replacement for the vernier calipers which had long been the standard equipment.
Needless to say, I had no choice but to learn about maintaining dial calipers and qualifying calibration on them. The best quality Swiss-made ones were quite reliable, if kept clean, but even those could 'jump' if a speck of dirt got into the 'clockwork'. They were surprisingly accurate over their full range, actually, seldom if ever more than .001 off when read on a gage block stack.
Our machine operators often got cheap dial calipers, thought to be 'cost-effective' for open-tolerance work.
An all too usual failure mode was that they would work alright when new, with known but consistent error, but after a bit of use, would become 'erratic', sometimes reading within .001 of nominal, sometimes .003 to .010 off, but unpredictably so. This was usually due to wear in the mechanism, particularly pinion stems, which, unlike the 'watch-work' quality of the Swiss units, would be soft brass.
Some of these cheap dial calipers seemed to wear out surprisingly quickly, whilst others would become a bit 'erratic' but stay within .005 or so. There were quite a few makes of those, made in quite a number of countries, and some cheap ones were surprisingly well made, whilst others could be best described as 'sub-pathetic'.
So.....thats the story......I admit to 'prejudice' about cheap dial calipers, but, damn it all, I well and truly earned that prejudice, from first-hand experience.
The question here, I suppose, is whether they are 'good enough' for the work at hand.
They might be, for a while, until they get some wear, but any cheap measuring tool is a 'false economy', in my opinion.
cheers
Carla



Trimming cases is ONLY done when you full-length resize bottle necked cartridges like the .357 sig, 7.62x25 Tokarev, 7.62x39, or .223. And just about EVERY rifle case that has a shoulder. But for 9mm, .45, .40, .380, .44, .357, .38 ETC, 98.9% of reloaders will tell you they have NEVER trimmed those cases and plan to NEVER trim them. BUT, every now and then a bad case gets in somewhere and you might need to trim it or just toss it. I am up to about 4000 + reloaded .44 mag, 9mm, and .45 ACP and I have not trimmed once yet. But I bought a trimmer for 9mm when I got into reloading because SOMEWHERE I read that you needed to trim your brass... Boy what a waste of money that was. Oh well, better to not need it and have it then to not have it and need it right? 

We all know you would never leave your mom's basement to make ammo. Now somebody go PM FP so he can come here and give a two word reply... 


Big, big difference between 30-30 and his ammo.
Comment