Seems like Lucky Gunner has come to the same conclusion re. the .32 H&R Mag.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
go to carry gun
Collapse
X
-
-
thanks, Paladin. very informative. definitely worth watching through to the end. I note the chart towards the end that also includes .22 data. my point is and to echo his comment, accuracy re shot placement is greatly important no matter caliber. and if a smaller caliber gets one to that place of accuracy then so be it. again, thanks! if he updates I hope you post it here."The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound."-- as seen on a t-shirt
Originally posted by The ShootistJust use it for an excuse to keep buying "her" guns till you find the right one...good way to check off your wanted to buy list with the idea of finding her the one she wants of course :DComment
-
Comment
-
My Glock 42 isn't really working out for me. I was looking into the Shield 9mm and one of my coworkers just suggested the Sig P365. The sizes all seem comparable; but, I did note the Shield is much heavier. That is a consideration for me with CCW. I was planning to rent a Shield to try it out and now I think I'll add P365 to the list.Meowr!Comment
-
I carry every day and in my opinion the P365 is the be all and end all of easily concealable guns. I started my "easy to conceal" journey with a G26, then an M&P 340 AirLite .357 (miserable to shoot so I loaded it with .38 spl...still not fun), then a Shield, then a G43, and finally, the P365, which is my current EDC and the only thing I would consider replacing it with would be the P365XL simply due to my XL-size hands.
I've shot the Shield and the P365 in USPSA matches just for fun, and have run both of them in "tactical" training courses where full-size guns were recommended. Both of those pistols (and the G43) are as accurate as full-size guns and will run with the big boys if you invest the training time to be able to do your part. That said, the P365 is the best of the three in magazine capacity, out-of-the-box trigger, ergonomics and fit and finish.
If money is no object I recommend a P365 -- the G43 and Shield are good lower cost options, with the Shield winning on performance per dollar (in California). The G43 and the Shield will need better sights, the P365 sights are good to go out of the box.
A revolver is a simpler option with less of a learning curve than a semi-automatic. The downside to a snub nose revolver is of course ammunition capacity, ease/speed of reloading, and placing accurate shots beyond 7-yards (revolvers are not inaccurate, but the sights and small grips of the ones most people use for pocket/purse carry do impose limitations that the P365/Shield/G43 are not constrained by).
Lastly, please forgive me if you are already well-versed in the benefits of appropriate training, but if you are not, the right type and amount of training will make much more of a difference to your safety and self-defense capability than the difference between any of the pistols you may be considering.Last edited by Stumpfenhammer; 12-20-2019, 11:05 AM.FOR SALE - Orange CountyComment
-
Hi. So what did you choose?
I am now looking for a carry weapon. I am leaning toward Sig P365 (+/- SAS), then between Springfield EMP (which feels great in my hand) and Glock 26 (which is probably the most reliable but feels lousy in my hand).
So what did you choose?Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,865,423
Posts: 25,130,219
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 3,839
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 5438 users online. 101 members and 5337 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.


Comment