As to your litigation point , should you deploy an irritant in the air ( pepper spray ) as an EP agent , you will most likely do it amongst a small crowd and at that point litigations are guaranteed . If the darts from your taser miss the intended target and hit someone else , same result .
You want to use "targeted force" aimed at that ONE person that is causing whatever issue it is you are reacting to . You are being paid to protect your client , not to enter in hand to hand combat . the second you use force , whatever it is , you open yourself to lawsuits , that is why as an EP agent you should have some serious insurance . Never be caught without it !!!!
As a Security Officer , the whole dynamic is different as you are most likely to be protecting an Area and would have to interdict access to said area by unauthorized person , that is where deployment of taser and/or pepper spray has a strategic use .
You want to use "targeted force" aimed at that ONE person that is causing whatever issue it is you are reacting to . You are being paid to protect your client , not to enter in hand to hand combat . the second you use force , whatever it is , you open yourself to lawsuits , that is why as an EP agent you should have some serious insurance . Never be caught without it !!!!
As a Security Officer , the whole dynamic is different as you are most likely to be protecting an Area and would have to interdict access to said area by unauthorized person , that is where deployment of taser and/or pepper spray has a strategic use .
Comment