Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

AW Registration Guide **3/18/2021 update: Registration may re-open soon**

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigbully
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 1904

    I wonder what percent of those firearms is actually AR15s since those were the easiest to make compliant. Also, how many are shotguns that really should never have been part of the registration.

    Comment

    • mshill
      Veteran Member
      • Dec 2012
      • 4395

      Originally posted by cockedandglocked
      I suspect that the failure at getting any substantial numbers to register was due to a number of different reasons, probably broken down roughly as follows:
      • 33% did not even know about Registration, or simply forgot all about it during the 13 months between the law passing and the registration opening.
      Based on my experience I would have put this number more like 70%. A vast majority of gun owners in this state don't pay any attention to what's going on around them (eg. situational awareness) let alone what is going on in the capitol.
      The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.

      Comment

      • beanz2
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Nov 2008
        • 12024

        Originally posted by shaocaholica
        Data point time!

        Got a single envelope from DOJ with some approval letters. Some interesting notes:

        1)All of my submissions were separate. I ate $15 per gun just so a single gun would not hold up a batch.

        2)The individual letters I got (in one envelope) all had a single gun on them, EXCEPT one letter had 2 guns that were submitted separately.

        3)They stuffed 8 letters into one envelope so I guess that's efficient.

        4)The letters covered submissions ranging from 5/16 through 6/26. So just counting the 6/26 submission, that's quite the quick turn around at only 2 weeks!

        However, I still have submissions from within that same range that are still pending. Mostly stuff from manufacturers that were not in the drop down but also a few that were.
        Snap. What a smart move. I thought about doing that, but at the end, me Mr. Tightwad prevailed and registered the guns in 4 batches.
        sigpic
        The wife will be pissed, but Jesus always forgives.

        Comment

        • BagelBites
          Member
          • Mar 2016
          • 294

          Originally posted by Xerxes
          Dang, as of June 30th only 6,213 individuals and 13,159 firearms registered.

          I was guessing on 30% compliance (~500,000) based upon the last two big registrations.

          Now if you subtract the 6,212 Calgun members who used this thread to help them with registration that leaves only ONE person who has been successful navigating through the registration process on there own.
          lol!

          Comment

          • Dvrjon
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Nov 2012
            • 11200

            Originally posted by Discogodfather
            CA PEN 30900(b)(1): https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/f...ctionNum=30900.
            (b) (1) Any person who, from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2016, inclusive, lawfully possessed an assault weapon that does not have a fixed magazine, as defined in Section 30515, including those weapons with an ammunition feeding device that can be readily removed from the firearm with the use of a tool, shall register the firearm before July 1, 2018, but not before the effective date of the regulations adopted pursuant to paragraph (5), with the department pursuant to those procedures that the department may establish by regulation pursuant to paragraph (5).
            11 CCR 5469: https://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Doc...ta=(sc.Default)
            Any person who, from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2016, inclusive, lawfully possessed an assault weapon that does not have a fixed magazine, as defined in Penal Code section 30515, including those weapons with an ammunition feeding device that can be readily removed from the firearm with the use of a tool (commonly referred to as a bullet-button weapon) must register the firearm before July 1, 2018.
            OAG Website: https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/bullet-b...assault-weapon
            REMINDER: ASSAULT WEAPON REGISTRATION ENDS AT 11: 59: 59 P.M. ON JUNE 30, 2018.
            All applications for assault weapon registration must be submitted by this deadline. No applications will be accepted thereafter (see Penal Code section 30900(b)(1) and California Code of Regulations, title 11, division 5, chapter 39, section 5469).
            According to the letter,
            An application being processed is not considered registered.
            OOOOps.

            DOJ appears to have no (ZERO) legal authority to approve anything after 06/30/2018.

            Comment

            • CandG
              Spent $299 for this text!
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Apr 2014
              • 16970

              Originally posted by Dvrjon
              CA PEN 30900(b)(1): https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/f...ctionNum=30900.
              11 CCR 5469: https://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Doc...ta=(sc.Default)

              OAG Website: https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/bullet-b...assault-weapon
              According to the letter,

              OOOOps.

              DOJ appears to have no (ZERO) legal authority to approve anything after 06/30/2018.
              I've been saying from the beginning - we're at their mercy, they have no obligations to do anything. Luckily it appears they're playing nice about that so far, and I don't think the law forbids them from issuing registrations after 7/1, and also DOJ takes the position that the word of law doesn't apply to them anyways.

              They also, startlingly, had no legal requirement to approve anything at all, ever. Frankly I'm shocked they didn't play that game.
              Last edited by CandG; 07-11-2018, 7:48 PM.
              Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


              Comment

              • Dvrjon
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • Nov 2012
                • 11200

                Originally posted by cockedandglocked
                Yep, I've been saying that from the beginning - we're at their mercy. Luckily it appears they're playing nice about that so far.

                Comment

                • shaocaholica
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 889

                  It's unrealistic to have all applications processed by the submission deadline regardless if its firearms related or not. There's no legal or otherwise precedent for that.

                  Comment

                  • Dvrjon
                    CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 11200

                    Originally posted by shaocaholica
                    It's unrealistic to have all applications processed by the submission deadline regardless if its firearms related or not. There's no legal or otherwise precedent for that.
                    the statute doesn’t set a submission deadline; it sets a registration deadline.

                    The DOJ regs affirm the registration deadline.

                    The DOJ letter clearly shows that submitted is not registered.

                    There’s a lot of precedent against government contravening statute with policy.

                    Expect a really quick change to the regs separating submission from registration and allowing what they’re doing.
                    Last edited by Dvrjon; 07-11-2018, 8:01 PM.

                    Comment

                    • CandG
                      Spent $299 for this text!
                      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                      • Apr 2014
                      • 16970

                      The deadline is for us, it says WE must register before 7/1. There are no statutory deadlines on when DOJ must stop processing and issuing them. Obviously they understand that, as they've issued many registrations after 7/1.
                      Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


                      Comment

                      • CandG
                        Spent $299 for this text!
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Apr 2014
                        • 16970

                        To me, the letter pretty clearly is saying that their count does not include guns that weren't registered before 6/30 simply because they don't know how many will be registered after that date. It does not, to me, imply that no weapons will be registered after 7/1, proven by the fact that dozens of people have reported theirs being registered after 7/1.
                        Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


                        Comment

                        • shaocaholica
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2014
                          • 889

                          Ok so if you want to play the semantics game then all submissions are registrations until rejected. They said it themselves.

                          Comment

                          • solidfreshdope
                            Senior Member
                            • Jun 2016
                            • 808

                            Originally posted by shaocaholica
                            Ok so if you want to play the semantics game then all submissions are registrations until rejected. They said it themselves.


                            Technically what they say would mean that submissions are not considered registered until they are approved / send letter.


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
                            Welcome to the United Snakes.

                            Comment

                            • Dvrjon
                              CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                              • Nov 2012
                              • 11200

                              Comment

                              • DoctorLove
                                Member
                                • Aug 2013
                                • 328

                                I received an incomplete notice for my anderson am15. the picture i submitted clearly shows "am15" on the receiver, yet the message i received reads something like "based on your photos, the model is "mp-15". please correct your application." Should i just change it to the incorrect model?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1