Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Contrary to "SuperTool" allegations, I didn't "call DOJ" on any personl/vendor...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #91
    RobG
    Veteran Member
    • Dec 2006
    • 4887

    While I appreciate Bill's passion, I say let it go. If people want to push the envelope of legality I say go for it. It is up to the individual to know what is and what is not legal and how much of their life they are willing to risk over a magnet.

    Comment

    • #92
      johnyreb
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 1101

      Originally posted by RobG
      While I appreciate Bill's passion, I say let it go. If people want to push the envelope of legality I say go for it. It is up to the individual to know what is and what is not legal and how much of their life they are willing to risk over a magnet.


      Because pushing the envelope is what gave us gems like sb249

      The 80% AR insanity has given us SB808


      By all means keep on pushing that grey area here in CA, the antis need fresh ideas for bans....

      Comment

      • #93
        IVC
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Jul 2010
        • 17594

        Originally posted by johnyreb
        The 80% AR insanity has given us SB808
        Not a good argument.

        What's the difference between not using 80% builds because they might get banned and not using 80% builds because they did get banned?

        If there is a "right" that is taken away the moment it is exercised, I'd say let's put it on the books as illegal - it makes no practical difference since either way one cannot do it, but at least the courts can see the true picture when it all gets challenged...
        sigpicNRA Benefactor Member

        Comment

        • #94
          Tincon
          Mortuus Ergo Invictus
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Nov 2012
          • 5062

          Originally posted by RobG
          While I appreciate Bill's passion, I say let it go. If people want to push the envelope of legality I say go for it. It is up to the individual to know what is and what is not legal and how much of their life they are willing to risk over a magnet.
          That's the problem, they don't know. And if no one tells them otherwise, they will believe the BS from some vendor, use this crap out at the range, and go to prison.
          My posts may contain general information related to the law, however, THEY ARE NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND I AM NOT A LAWYER. I recommend you consult a lawyer if you want legal advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship exists or will be formed between myself and any other person on the basis of these posts. Pronouns I may use (such as "you" and "your") do NOT refer to any particular person under any circumstance.

          Comment

          • #95
            Merc1138
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Feb 2009
            • 19742

            Originally posted by Tincon
            That's the problem, they don't know. And if no one tells them otherwise, they will believe the BS from some vendor, use this crap out at the range, and go to prison.
            I don't understand how RobG could have seriously typed that statement, since he knows full well the amount of BS that comes out of gun shops and manufacturers regarding things that aren't even legal issues(gun X is better than gun Y, this manufacturers 9mm will get stopped by a leather jacket while this other company makes 9mm cartridges that will go through 10 cinderblock walls, hell we've still got shops in CA claiming that only top loading ARs are legal).

            Comment

            • #96
              johnyreb
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2009
              • 1101

              Originally posted by IVC
              Not a good argument.

              What's the difference between not using 80% builds because they might get banned and not using 80% builds because they did get banned?

              If there is a "right" that is taken away the moment it is exercised, I'd say let's put it on the books as illegal - it makes no practical difference since either way one cannot do it, but at least the courts can see the true picture when it all gets challenged...
              Using CNC shops to finish ARs was determined to be illegal federally...and yet people continued....watch the news much? Sacramento was ground zero for it.

              It was pushed by people out to make a buck, and now it's over.

              The fallout of that nonsense is SB808...which pretty much screws home builders/hobbyists.


              These "tools" are the same mentality make a buck and run.

              Was not SB249 because of the mag magnet? It was all over the news as such....


              Then we have Tannerite ......

              Comment

              • #97
                MudCamper
                Veteran Member
                • Mar 2007
                • 4593

                Originally posted by barrage
                I agree. In the spirit of honesty though, I swear I didn't make the first response with the intention to troll. I just don't like Bill because he represents what I perceive as a Loyalist to the State for continuing to bend over backwards in an effort to acquiesce to illegal laws instead of standing in defiance to them.
                You are a freakin idiot. Do you know how many people Bill has help stay out of Jail? It's countless, but I personally know a few. You don't know what you are talking about. Get over yourself.

                Comment

                • #98
                  Wiz-of-Awd
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 3556

                  Feels like this thread has just become a barrage of nonsense.

                  So "Page 4"

                  A.W.D.
                  Seven. The answer is always seven.

                  Comment

                  • #99
                    robertkjjj
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 900

                    chicken or egg?

                    I disagree with your logic, and here is why:
                    By your logic, the reason that the antis keep coming up with MORE new laws against us, is because we pro-2nd people keep "provoking" them to do it by finding new ways to have the kind of guns we want. You act as if we pro-2nd people are doing these creative workarounds in some kind of vacuum. You act as if we pro-2nd people go to all this trouble, expense, and what-not for no reason whatsoever.

                    I say, sir, you have it 180 degrees backwards.What is really happening is this sequence:
                    1. People in CA have certain types of rifles and pistols that are commonplace in most other states.
                    2. A gun-related crime gets committed that grabs the headlines.
                    3. In reaction to the crime, all the libs in Sacramento gear up and write bills that chip away at the RTKBA all around the edges. Magazine sizes, bullet buttons, AR features, wait times, you name it.
                    4. Some of the bills pass.
                    5. In reaction to the new bills, CA gun owners get pissed, because now they can't have some of the firearms and features that they can easily get in most other states.
                    6. Small companies step in, and create small inventions that help CA gun owners continue to have the old features they still want, but still remain within the letter of the law(or close to it )
                    7. CA gun owners buy the new inventions, like them, and word of mouth etc. increases sales. Soon, word of the invention being used reaches the antis.
                    8. The antis react in horror, like this: "Those a-hole gun people! How dare they! How dare they try to work around OUR new wonderful law! We'll show them!! We'll just write ANOTHER law!!!!"
                    9. And then they do.
                    10. And the circle of insanity continues.


                    Sir, it's not "pushing the envelope". Rather, it's a pretty darn logical reaction to being subjected to anti-2nd laws.

                    Now, a "normal" person would recognize that constantly repressing people would create these kind of normal desires for circumvention and workarounds. But then, we're not dealing with "normal" people'. We're dealing with statists. We're dealing with control freaks. We're dealing with liberals.

                    Just as a person who is wrongly convicted and locked up in a cage will CONSTANTLY look for a way to escape, so it is with the firearm owners in the great state of CA.


                    ~~~~~~~~


                    Originally posted by johnyreb
                    Because pushing the envelope is what gave us gems like sb249

                    The 80% AR insanity has given us SB808


                    By all means keep on pushing that grey area here in CA, the antis need fresh ideas for bans....
                    NRA Lifetime Member. Hunter & Target Shooter.
                    San Diego County.
                    Passionate supporter of RTKBA.
                    Supporter of conceal and open-carry.[/SIZE]
                    "It's called the Bill Of Rights. Not the Bill of Needs."[/SIZE]

                    Comment

                    • johnyreb
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 1101

                      Um okay,

                      Keep on with the current behavior, it's worked so well for us so far!




                      Originally posted by robertkjjj
                      I disagree with your logic, and here is why:
                      By your logic, the reason that the antis keep coming up with MORE new laws against us, is because we pro-2nd people keep "provoking" them to do it by finding new ways to have the kind of guns we want. You act as if we pro-2nd people are doing these creative workarounds in some kind of vacuum. You act as if we pro-2nd people go to all this trouble, expense, and what-not for no reason whatsoever.

                      I say, sir, you have it 180 degrees backwards.What is really happening is this sequence:
                      1. People in CA have certain types of rifles and pistols that are commonplace in most other states.
                      2. A gun-related crime gets committed that grabs the headlines.
                      3. In reaction to the crime, all the libs in Sacramento gear up and write bills that chip away at the RTKBA all around the edges. Magazine sizes, bullet buttons, AR features, wait times, you name it.
                      4. Some of the bills pass.
                      5. In reaction to the new bills, CA gun owners get pissed, because now they can't have some of the firearms and features that they can easily get in most other states.
                      6. Small companies step in, and create small inventions that help CA gun owners continue to have the old features they still want, but still remain within the letter of the law(or close to it )
                      7. CA gun owners buy the new inventions, like them, and word of mouth etc. increases sales. Soon, word of the invention being used reaches the antis.
                      8. The antis react in horror, like this: "Those a-hole gun people! How dare they! How dare they try to work around OUR new wonderful law! We'll show them!! We'll just write ANOTHER law!!!!"
                      9. And then they do.
                      10. And the circle of insanity continues.


                      Sir, it's not "pushing the envelope". Rather, it's a pretty darn logical reaction to being subjected to anti-2nd laws.

                      Now, a "normal" person would recognize that constantly repressing people would create these kind of normal desires for circumvention and workarounds. But then, we're not dealing with "normal" people'. We're dealing with statists. We're dealing with control freaks. We're dealing with liberals.

                      Just as a person who is wrongly convicted and locked up in a cage will CONSTANTLY look for a way to escape, so it is with the firearm owners in the great state of CA.


                      ~~~~~~~~

                      Comment

                      • Mayor McRifle
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Dec 2013
                        • 7660

                        Originally posted by johnyreb
                        Um okay,

                        Keep on with the current behavior, it's worked so well for us so far!
                        LOL.

                        But if we keep doing the same thing over and over again, we're bound to get different results eventually. Right?
                        Anchors Aweigh

                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • robertkjjj
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 900

                          Stand up or lie down for your rights.....

                          Ya know, for a guy who calls himself "johnnyreb", I don't see even the slightest smidge of "rebel" in you.

                          Just stating the obvious.

                          ~~~~~~~~

                          Originally posted by johnyreb
                          Um okay,

                          Keep on with the current behavior, it's worked so well for us so far!
                          NRA Lifetime Member. Hunter & Target Shooter.
                          San Diego County.
                          Passionate supporter of RTKBA.
                          Supporter of conceal and open-carry.[/SIZE]
                          "It's called the Bill Of Rights. Not the Bill of Needs."[/SIZE]

                          Comment

                          • jcwatchdog
                            Veteran Member
                            • Aug 2012
                            • 2571

                            Originally posted by bwiese

                            The number of arrests/convictions involving magnetic BB overrides in recent times is pretty high.


                            BTW I think in recent year or so a fair fraction of 'technical CA AW violations' charged for post-2006 guns may well've
                            been due to such magnetic overrides given number of cases
                            Can you please cite some circumstances/cases? I've just never heard of any except some ancedotal ones, but never anything solid. And I don't mean a case with a felon using a bullet button on a ar-15 while having a stash of drugs. I'm just talking about a conviction of a person who was just shooting a legal ar15 and had used a bullet button w/mag magnet.

                            Comment

                            • bwiese
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Oct 2005
                              • 27621

                              AB808 wasn't just about Joe Blow-Building-80%ers-in-his-garage.

                              AB808 happened because of accumulation of...
                              • Ares' stupid PR drama;
                              • BATF etc. investigation dubious CNC houses (Sacto! Fresno!...) selling a variety of
                                (often illegally-configured) guns to prohibited people.

                                Esp with the content of recorded conversations.

                                Clearly many were in the mfg trade by known law, and "pushing the big red button" was
                                an artifice. Furthermore, they appear to have assembled full guns from receivers, and
                                in a variety of prohibited categories. Probl. a buncha uncharged state violations too.
                              [I hate that term 80% anyway since there's no such thing.]

                              Bill Wiese
                              San Jose, CA

                              CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
                              sigpic
                              No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
                              to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
                              ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
                              employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
                              legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

                              Comment

                              • hornswaggled
                                Senior Member
                                • Feb 2011
                                • 1650

                                Any magnet vendor who demos his product slapping it on a featureless rifle or separated lower and mentions nothing how it's illegal to use on the vast majority of BB'd rifles in California is

                                A

                                ****ing

                                Scumbag
                                sigpicNRA Endowment Member
                                SAF Defender's Club

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1