Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Long Beach officer shoots off-duty LAPD officer

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    Casual Observer
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2008
    • 1400

    Originally posted by BigKevLA
    How is diversity equal to loosened standards???????WTF
    In order to establish a more "diversified" police force, LAPD has been cutting some corners when it comes to applicants. Skin color and ethnicity now take presidence over most other considerations.

    It's nothing new either in LA. I've had friends and family in LAPD, LACoFD and LAFD say they've been denied positions because they were white. Officially, they gloss it over. Internally though, it can be pretty blatant from what I've heard over the years.

    Comment

    • #32
      Gator Monroe
      Banned
      • Oct 2007
      • 6422

      Originally posted by Casual Observer
      In order to establish a more "diversified" police force, LAPD has been cutting some corners when it comes to applicants. Skin color and ethnicity now take presidence over most other considerations.

      It's nothing new either in LA. I've had friends and family in LAPD, LACoFD and LAFD say they've been denied positions because they were white. Officially, they gloss it over. Internally though, it can be pretty blatant from what I've heard over the years.
      Ditto !

      Comment

      • #33
        BigKevLA
        Member
        • Apr 2008
        • 297

        Originally posted by Gator Monroe
        Ask the Border Patrol & Homeland Security ??????WTF
        The Border Patrol and Homeland Security didn't make the comment, you did.

        Why can't you explain yourself?
        NRA Instructor-Pistol

        Comment

        • #34
          1911su16b870
          CGN/CGSSA Contributor
          CGN Contributor
          • Dec 2006
          • 7654

          Originally posted by Equalizer2
          ...As police prepared to serve a search warrant at the Belmont Heights home of an LAPD officer...When responding units arrived, they saw Jason Geggie, a 26-year-old LAPD officer, who matched the suspect description and appeared drunk and was stumbling...Geggie was booked on charges of exhibiting a firearm in the presence of a police officer in a threatening manner and exhibiting a firearm at any person in a threatening manner, police said...that friends of his told investigators he had been drinking heavily when he wandered off before the shooting...Long Beach Police, with LAPD present, were preparing to serve a search warrant at Geggie's home, sources said...
          Alot of fishy stuff going on...
          1. They had a search warrant for him.
          2. Alcohol and firearms don't mix.
          "Bruen, the Bruen opinion, I believe, discarded the intermediate scrutiny test that I also thought was not very useful; and has, instead, replaced it with a text history and tradition test." Judge Benitez 12-12-2022

          NRA Endowment Life Member, CRPA Life Member
          GLOCK (Gen 1-5, G42/43), Colt AR15/M16/M4, Sig P320, Sig P365, Beretta 90 series, Remington 870, HK UMP Factory Armorer
          Remington Nylon, 1911, HK, Ruger, Hudson H9 Armorer, just for fun!
          I instruct it if you shoot it.

          Comment

          • #35
            BigKevLA
            Member
            • Apr 2008
            • 297

            Originally posted by Casual Observer
            In order to establish a more "diversified" police force, LAPD has been cutting some corners when it comes to applicants. Skin color and ethnicity now take presidence over most other considerations.

            It's nothing new either in LA. I've had friends and family in LAPD, LACoFD and LAFD say they've been denied positions because they were white. Officially, they gloss it over. Internally though, it can be pretty blatant from what I've heard over the years.
            I think more so that minority citizens were/have been wrong by past actions of those agencies and some have consent decrees in place. Because there must be diversity in the workplace I don't see any evidence that minorities being hired by those agencies mean that those individuals were less qualified that a white person. that kind of thinking is what put the agencies in the mess that they are in now. I bet you can find tons of people that will say that they have been passed of for promotions etc because they are Asian,Black, Mexican or a Woman.
            NRA Instructor-Pistol

            Comment

            • #36
              CitaDeL
              Calguns Addict
              • May 2007
              • 5843

              Originally posted by Liberty1
              I wouldn't call this "open carry". When we refer to that activity it means a sidearm in a holster generally. If one is in violation of 417 PC that is not "Open Carry" it is brandishing.

              As far as departments regulating off duty firearm possession and alcohol consumption, I don't think they have the authority. I know they can't regulate off duty carry (open or concealed). And alcohol consumption being a legal activity, I doubt a dept. could regulate their off duty officers in this regard. It would be a matter for the legislature only IMO. Some depts. may have a policy but it may be unenforcable.

              I think current law is sufficient. 647(f) PC (drunk in public) and 417 PC (brandishing) provide opportunity for illegal activities to be prosecuted. Any conviction of a misdemeanor or felony crime allows a dept. to terminate that officer.

              Let the "darwins" suffer the consequences and let the responsible ones (everyone not just officers) exercise their right to self defense in non-secure areas. Making bars "victim disarmament zones" will not make us safer (I reference the recent justified self-defense shooting in a Nevada bar that resulted in the death of the assailants).

              If a private property owner wanted to regulate carry I would not legally oppose the property owner. But at the same time, in doing so, should incur the liability for the prohibition.

              (ironically, I'm enjoying a certain beverage and lunch at a Long Beach restaurant right now with "my little cced friend")
              +1

              I'm pleased you chimed in earlier than I did Liberty1- You say what Im thinking without my acerbic and often abrasive wording.

              On another vein, I think its interesting how, without the benefit of the totality of the facts, some posters concluded that this must have been 'open carry' gone wrong. Thank you folks, for your continued support. I mean that. Really.



              Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim -- when he defends himself -- as a criminal. Bastiat

              Comment

              • #37
                pnkssbtz
                Veteran Member
                • Oct 2006
                • 3555

                So, why isn't he being charged with assault with a deadly weapon?


                How exactly do you "exhibit a firearm in the presence of a police officer in a threatening manner" or "exhibit a firearm at any person in a threatening manner" without it being assault with a deadly weapon?

                Comment

                • #38
                  Liberty1
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 5541

                  Originally posted by Equalizer2
                  I just heard on KFI, that Geggie was carrying a Shotgun and refused to put it down.
                  Heard the same thing. There are lots of camera's in Longbeach. It would be reassuring to see video back-up the shooting officers story. IMO refusing to put down a shot gun doesn't equal getting shot unless the officer perceived an aggressive move toward pointing the shotgun toward someone.

                  It's very hard to Monday morning quarterback these situations.
                  False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
                  -- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    Liberty1
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 5541

                    Originally posted by pnkssbtz
                    So, why isn't he being charged with assault with a deadly weapon?


                    How exactly do you "exhibit a firearm in the presence of a police officer in a threatening manner" or "exhibit a firearm at any person in a threatening manner" without it being assault with a deadly weapon?
                    Pointing a firearm at someone, not in self defense, is still brandishing. If one also says "I'm going to kill you", that is "criminal threats" 422 PC. ADW (245 PC) is a "swing(shoot) and miss" or "swing(shoot) and hit". If the firearm is fired, there is also the possibility of an attempt murder (664-187 PC) charge.
                    Last edited by Liberty1; 07-30-2008, 6:58 PM.
                    False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
                    -- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      eltee
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 897

                      Ours does. If you drink and shoot, the department will turn on you like a jilted wife.

                      There is a famous case in SFPD that set a precedent. At one time SFPD off-dutys were required to carry. One night at a well known Irish Bar a drunk off-duty officer shot and killed another patron in what started as a typical bar beef turned bar brawl.

                      His defense, in part, was that he was required by law to CCW when off duty. He still went to jail but his case changed alot of policies thoughout California and possibly beyond. This was in the 60's or 70's.

                      Comment

                      • #41
                        Shotgun Man
                        Veteran Member
                        • Oct 2007
                        • 4053

                        Originally posted by 1911su16b870
                        Alot of fishy stuff going on...
                        1. They had a search warrant for him.
                        2. Alcohol and firearms don't mix.

                        I believe you misread the article that you quoted in your post. The search warrant was executed after the incident. As the police prepared to execute the search warrant, they revealed more details concerning the investigation.
                        Last edited by Shotgun Man; 07-30-2008, 7:32 PM.

                        Comment

                        • #42
                          tyrist
                          Veteran Member
                          • Jun 2007
                          • 4564

                          They have to charge the injured Officer with something otherwise the Long Beach Officer just comitted attempt murder. This one is going to take a long time, who knows what happened everything seems odd about this.

                          Why the heck would he be walking down the street with a shotgun first of all.

                          Comment

                          • #43
                            U2BassAce
                            Senior Member
                            • May 2007
                            • 1677

                            A buddy of mine in Long Beach told me the suspect was not carrying a shot gun but was shot with a shot gun. I am very interested in what comes out tomorrow.

                            Comment

                            • #44
                              bigthaiboy
                              Veteran Member
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 4795

                              This shooting happened less than 3 blocks from my house. No wonder I could hear the helicopter flying around last night.

                              First I heard about this story, was when a friend of mine called me this morning to check it wasn't me that had been shot, since he knew I owned firearms and lived on Mira Mar. He was hoping I hadn't gone on a drunken rampage (this was before it was reported the individual who was shot was a cop).

                              I had to remind him, I don't do dumb things like that, especially with firearms.

                              Life can make you do many things, even kiss a man with a runny nose.

                              Comment

                              • #45
                                thatsteveguy
                                Senior Member
                                • Mar 2006
                                • 1674

                                Originally posted by Equalizer2
                                I just heard on KFI, that Geggie was carrying a Shotgun and refused to put it down.
                                Wow! It's a good thing he wasn't carrying an unsafe (off roster) handgun ...that might have been too embarrasing!
                                A good rifle build isn't cheap, but a bad one can be expensive!

                                My house; like the White House, is NOT a gun free zone!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1