The STOP SB 249 (Yee) Campaign: Moves fwd to Appropriations Cmte - Back to Work!!

[JSolie]

Was Hagman a total no-show? Or was he just out of the room?

[tenpercentfirearms]

Was Hagman a total no-show? Or was he just out of the room?

It was explained to me that there is a lot of committee business that conflicts. So even though Hagman wasn't there, he still gets to register his symbolic no vote later. That is why I was asking what was going on before burning him at the stake before having all of the facts.

So do not light him up yet. Let the day go by so we can figure out the details. I doubt he sold us out and everything will probably be on the up and up in the end. Typical CA BS. We are outnumbered.

[Aldo The Apache]

Signed up!

[DisturbedAle]

Signed.

[goober]

It was explained to me that there is a lot of committee business that conflicts. So even though Hagman wasn't there, he still gets to register his symbolic no vote later. That is why I was asking what was going on before burning him at the stake before having all of the facts.

So do not light him up yet. Let the day go by so we can figure out the details. I doubt he sold us out and everything will probably be on the up and up in the end. Typical CA BS. We are outnumbered.

Absolutely agree.

[NYsteveZ]

Okay...I understand blaming the people who bought and sold "mag magnets", but then again, if this state wasnt so Communist, we wouldnt even be speaking about them, or bullet buttons, or hi-cap magazines, or...Get my drift?

All this bill has done was make me angry at the sh**heads who designed and authored it. I am now HELLBENT on passing bills against ANY of their beliefs, or laws they want repealed or passed. They threw everything out the window for me being reasonable and open to listening to their sides on marijuana, gay marriage, abortion, Obamacare...you name it. Diplomacy is no longer in my vocabulary with them. Hatfield/McCoy, Union/Confederate, now Conservatives/Liberals.

[monorailboy]

So, whats next ?? When does the Approp Committe Vote ? if that pasess...then what ?

[The Gleam]

It was explained to me that there is a lot of committee business that conflicts. So even though Hagman wasn't there, he still gets to register his symbolic no vote later. That is why I was asking what was going on before burning him at the stake before having all of the facts.

So do not light him up yet. Let the day go by so we can figure out the details. I doubt he sold us out and everything will probably be on the up and up in the end. Typical CA BS. We are outnumbered.

I understand; but with the passionate response emails we received, you would think more input would have been realized, actual attendance as show of support.

Though as I said much, much earlier; this afterall IS the "Public Safety Committee" and they are known to NEVER turn down an Anti-2nd Amendment bill.

[BHPFan]

Signed.

[ICONIC]

Ohh well round 2: Lets get it on!!!

[JSolie]

So do not light him up yet. Let the day go by so we can figure out the details. I doubt he sold us out and everything will probably be on the up and up in the end. Typical CA BS. We are outnumbered.

Got it. I'll refrain from sending my "Son, I am Dissapoint" letter. Yeah, I know that there are lots of schedule conflicts. This is not my first time walking this path.

Question about the Appropriations Committee: Am I correct that letters/correspondence should focus on "costs to the state and taxpayers?"

[mblosser100]

done!

[BoJackUSMC]

Done

[1911Operator]

same here

[bbsmth]

is there a way to listen to a recording of the discussion?