New Ca Supreme Court Chief Justice?

[Uxi]

Yes, and performing a "gay wedding" (funny, I thought there were only weddings) means right off the bat that they're anti-gun.

Certainly believe they'd be inclined that way more often than not.

[wash]

I've heard of lots of Filipino gun enthusiasts.

I've never heard of a gay Filipino gun enthusiast but that doesn't matter, she's married to a police officer and I bet he owns at least one gun.

And of course since I don't know of any gay Filipino gun enthusiasts, they can't possibly exist or maybe they just didn't tell me they were gay or gun enthusiasts...

As for the fashion issue, Gray looked like he was ready to hit the beach after Nordyke 3D.

[thedrse]

Even with small populations, you need a sample size of at least 25 to even start to approach accurate, and it needs to be a random sample. Contacting all of your gay friends (2 of which you introduced to guns) doesn't count because birds of a feather flock together and if they are your friends, they represent only a small portion of the actual sample space. You would have to interview urban areas, rural areas, from all demographics, social groups, counties, et cetera. You would need a sample size of 10s of thousands before you could ever calculate usable data.

That is why neither my theory, or any theory to the contrary, can be reliable in any way without spending millions to find out.

I've coined a phrase for situations like this: In My Ignorant Opinion...

Lordy, we need a sarcasm font! You are absolutley right about my ridiculously small and most likely biased "survey". Guess I'll have to take my research down to the Castro on a Friday night and see if I can get some more accurate data... or not.

P.S. I completely agree with your "Only in Bakersfield" assessment...

[E Pluribus Unum]

Lordy, we need a sarcasm font! You are absolutley right about my ridiculously small and most likely biased "survey". Guess I'll have to take my research down to the Castro on a Friday night and see if I can get some more accurate data... or not.

P.S. I completely agree with your "Only in Bakersfield" assessment...

You are missing the point... you would have to conduct a RANDOM sample from EVERY county.

[thedrse]

You are missing the point... you would have to conduct a RANDOM sample from EVERY county.

On the contrary, I see the point clearly... which is why I agreed with you. It was a joke.

So yeah, anyway... how about those supreme court justices?