SB2 stay on hold 1/1/24 we will be criminals

[LuckyGuy]

I agree.

I'm over 70 and have lived in this state my entire life. I ain't doing nothing to change the way I protect myself and my loved ones.

I'm with you all the way, I had it with their Shi%. I do not want to play their game anymore.

[five.five-six]

Allah Ackbar!

[Packy14]

Was looking for this! lol! You win.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thankfully. Stupid state.

[AlmostHeaven]

The original poster needs to update the title of this thread to include the latest judicial developments.

[Rumblemonkey]

Round and round we go. What a thing to watch, and be effected by. I was hoping, waiting...

[XDJYo]

Thankfully. Stupid state.

Seems the State had their own un-freedom week aka infringe week.

[AlmostHeaven]

Seems the State had their own un-freedom week aka infringe week.

The gun rights community won a fantastic legal victory this week, but everyone needs to remain vigilant for potential Ninth Circuit evil machinations. Stay up-to-date with the latest judicial developments.

[Palmaris]

Here is practical question on “sensative area” I have no idea where to ask opinion. My friend works for MTA. This is partly funded by federal government. He is parking on MTA parking lot. Does this conceder federal property? Can he keep his CCW in locked container there? I understand this is not legal advise, just asking opinion.

[GetMeCoffee]

Here is practical question on ?sensative area? I have no idea where to ask opinion. My friend works for MTA. This is partly funded by federal government. He is parking on MTA parking lot. Does this conceder federal property? Can he keep his CCW in locked container there? I understand this is not legal advise, just asking opinion.

Just my amateur opinion, but I think he's OK. I'm not aware of a restriction on federal property in general (except USPS and staffed federal offices IIRC). There's the "common carrier" prohibition and I've never been 100% clear on that. Does it apply to subways, Metro, City busses? I'm sure it applies to Amtrak. But, your friend isn't getting on the train, so that would not come into play. And this is all for actual CCW. If he's got it in a locked container, that's even better.

Now... The MTA might have a policy against bringing a firearm on the property (they likely do). So he could get fired or possibly even have an incident where the IA pulls his permit.

[R Dale]

Attorneys on Retainer covers criminal acts and illegal weapons? It almost sounds too good to be true. I do not intend to make any accusations of malfeasance, but I wonder how the plan works.

The AOR plane is not insurance so they can cover most anything because everyone has a right to legal representation no matter what they were accused of.

[Dvrjon]

Here is practical question on ?sensative area? I have no idea where to ask opinion. My friend works for MTA. This is partly funded by federal government. He is parking on MTA parking lot. Does this conceder federal property? Can he keep his CCW in locked container there? I understand this is not legal advise, just asking opinion.

MTA is not owned or controlled by the Fed government.

However, CA PEN 171.7 reads:

171.7 (a) For purposes of this section:
(1) ?Public transit facility? means any land, building, or equipment, or any interest therein, including any station on a public transportation route, to which access is controlled in a manner consistent with the public transit authority?s security plan, whether or not the operation thereof produces revenue, that has as its primary purpose the operation of a public transit system or the providing of services to the passengers of a public transit system. A public transit system includes the vehicles used in the system, including, but not limited to, motor vehicles, streetcars, trackless trolleys, buses, light rail systems, rapid transit systems, subways, trains, or jitneys, that transport members of the public for hire.

(2) ?Firearm? has the same meaning as specified in subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 16520.

(b) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly possess any of the following in a public transit facility:
(1) Any firearm.

Whether Section (a)(1) includes employee parking is anybody?s guess. But, if it does, there is no exception for employees.

[Rickybillegas]

The gun rights community won a fantastic legal victory this week, but everyone needs to remain vigilant for potential Ninth Circuit evil machinations. Stay up-to-date with the latest judicial developments.

My understanding is the case will be heard by the merit panel in April.
We have at least till then to be free.

Then the case will be heard by the merits panel and a ruling will be forthcoming. I'm not too concerned about the merits panel.
I think we will get some kind of compromise/split decision, but the worst will continue to be enjoined.

It's after that I'm worried. The ruling will then be heard by the en-banc panel and that's where things could get bad.

[Rickybillegas]

I celebrated today by carrying into Walgreens to do my shopping.

[9Cal_OC]

I celebrated today by carrying into Walgreens to do my shopping.

Ok. . .

[Palmaris]

MTA is not owned or controlled by the Fed government.

However, CA PEN 171.7 reads:Whether Section (a)(1) includes employee parking is anybody?s guess. But, if it does, there is no exception for employees.

Thx a lot!