(GENERAL How Does Registration Work thread)

[Dutch3]

Methinks some people doth protest too much.

There is value in keeping your mouth shut.

Out.

[jok5tr]

I, too have a PS90 in what sounds like the same CA configuration as yours. For those who don't know, it has a non-permanently mounted flash suppressor cover that extends the firearm to 30" and covers the flash suppressor. The flash suppressor itself is permanently attached to the barrel to meet the 16" barrel requirement.
Yes, I could complain and ask how the firearm is legal one day and illegal the next (fixed vs non fixed barrel extenders) but I will let the smart guys (our freedom fighting lawyers) work that out. Meanwhile, the time line is short so here is my plan.
To avoid making the barrel extender/flash suppressor hider permanent to make 30" OAL, I am adding a DI butt plate with 1" and 2" extenders (4" overall). That will make it 30" not including the barrel extender. I will still need to leave the barrel extender on to register since it covers the flash suppressor. Once registered, I assume I can remove the barrel extender.....and depending on legal progress, the stock extender.....and maybe the bullet button someday.

I have a similar concern with my CA-configured X95. What is this DI buttplate with extenders that you are referring to? Could it be installed on a Tavor X95 as well? If you have any info or tips, I would really appreciate it.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[Jeep Guy]

DI is Damage Industries. Their butt plate and extenders are PS90 or P90 specific. I haven't looked for similar X95 accessories. I would hope someone makes something similar.
In lieu of a complete stock extender, I saw someone else's idea of bubba'ing up an L bracket on your stock to make an over shoulder or underarm "brace" to get to the OAL without changing the reach. I thought that was pretty creative.

[jok5tr]

DI is Damage Industries. Their butt plate and extenders are PS90 or P90 specific. I haven't looked for similar X95 accessories. I would hope someone makes something similar.
In lieu of a complete stock extender, I saw someone else's idea of bubba'ing up an L bracket on your stock to make an over shoulder or underarm "brace" to get to the OAL without changing the reach. I thought that was pretty creative.

I'm not sure I can picture what such a "brace" would look like... Are there any guidelines/restrictions on what is acceptable for counting towards the OAL? Since there doesn't seem to be anyone who makes extended X95 buttplate, I was thinking of getting a block of rubber and attaching it on top of existing buttplate somehow.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[caliguy93]

U guys do know that once registered the minimum length drops down to 26" right?

[Discogodfather]

U guys do know that once registered the minimum length drops down to 26" right?

It's unknown man, I would agree it's a strong possibility but I would counsel people not to do it right away. Aggressive DA's could use the definitions listed in the new regs as the defacto definition of AW, ignoring SB 23 definitions.

[Jeep Guy]

I'm not sure I can picture what such a "brace" would look like... Are there any guidelines/restrictions on what is acceptable for counting towards the OAL? Since there doesn't seem to be anyone who makes extended X95 buttplate, I was thinking of getting a block of rubber and attaching it on top of existing buttplate somehow.

I had a thought. Take it for what its worth.
Duct tape a 12" ruler to your cheek rest that extends over your shoulder to get the OAL.

[Jedediah Munroe]

I had a thought. Take it for what its worth.

Duct tape a 12" ruler to your cheek rest that extends over your shoulder to get the OAL.

Everyone keeps wanting an opportunity to show off their dildos in photos. How about a strap on for the stock?

[The Tiger]

Also, for "multi" marked receivers, you can select "firearm with interchangeable barrels" for the caliber.

If your "make" is not listed in the drop down menu, select "U S" and enter your make and model into the model text box. You should also enter make and model into the comments field

On interchangeable barrels?

If you have a multi marked receiver can you change caliber? And if you change caliber, can you change barrel length?

With AR's available in so many calibers and configurations, being so modular, can a single receiver have a 24" bull barrel in .223 and then 16" pencil (in .300 or 6.5 or whatever)? Or do you have to register 2 receivers? Or do you register the same receiver twice?

Are we done swapping uppers if these are registered? Replacement parts/barrels and changing configurations?

[mutejosh]

On interchangeable barrels?

If you have a multi marked receiver can you change caliber? And if you change caliber, can you change barrel length?

With AR's available in so many calibers and configurations, being so modular, can a single receiver have a 24" bull barrel in .223 and then 16" pencil (in .300 or 6.5 or whatever)? Or do you have to register 2 receivers? Or do you register the same receiver twice?

Are we done swapping uppers if these are registered? Replacement parts/barrels and changing configurations?

Choosing "Interchangeable Barrels" allows for different uppers/calibers to be used with a single lower.

[jwtiger69]

Choosing "Interchangeable Barrels" allows for different uppers/calibers to be used with a single lower.

So having two different uppers in 556 you would do that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mutejosh]

So having two different uppers in 556 you would do that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Any caliber/upper configuraton. When you choose the interchangeable barrel option you're free to change uppers as you please. It's pretty well spelled out in the CRPA webinar.

[caliguy93]

Here's a thought,

DOJ tried to make the argument that it is a new type of "BB AW" which is different then the regular "AW" and has a different set of laws which is why we must keep the BB.

People are afraid to remove barrel extensions because of this logic.. ok fine..


Well if BBAW are a different class of AW, then none of the AW restrictions should apply to BBAW because they are technically different classification and not applicable...

For example... BBAW can be transported regularly, they can be lenses differently etc...

DOJ can have it one way or another, they can't take all the bad limitation on an AW and say they apply to BBAW but not any of the benifits.

[Jedediah Munroe]

I like that idea. I give it two minutes before all knowing usual verbose opionators po-po that thought

[glock_nor_cal]

Has anyone successfully registered a rifle or lower they purchased in 2017? Has anyone received a rejection when trying to register one of these?