Link of that video, skip to 4:30
That's the most perverse interpretation of the 2A I've ever read. The 2A is there as a check and balance against tyranny "being necessary to the security of a free State." I no more want to kill anybody than I want our nuclear subs to launch our Trident ICBM's yet both are extremely necessary as a deterrent.
Not to mention the fact that the 2A gives no protection against the use of said arms, that is permissible by laws such as the castle doctrine or stand-your-ground which are all privileges granted by (some) state Government
That's the most perverse interpretation of the 2A I've ever read. The 2A is there as a check and balance against tyranny "being necessary to the security of a free State." I no more want to kill anybody than I want our nuclear subs to launch our Trident ICBM's yet both are extremely necessary as a deterrent.
Not to mention the fact that the 2A gives no protection against the use of said arms, that is permissible by laws such as the castle doctrine or stand-your-ground which are all privileges granted by (some) state Government

Comment