10 day waiting period upheld

[inferno999]

http://americanmilitarynews.com/2016/12/californias-10-day-waiting-period-for-all-gun-purchases-upheld/

At least we tried.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[penguinman]

http://americanmilitarynews.com/2016...chases-upheld/

At least we tried.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I expected this. At this point its impossible to get a reasonable hearing on any 2A issues in the 9th Circuit.

[madjack956]

Their reasons for upholding this has got to be the stupidest fn b.s. I have heard in a long time.

[The Gleam]

Somehow I have a feeling this is still not over.

[stix213]

I love how they justify this as back in the 18th century purchases took a long time, when reality is they took as long as your neighbor took to state his asking price. "Yeah I'll let it go for $4, sure". Purchase complete.

So much bs

[inferno999]

10 day waiting period upheld

I'm so tired of the 2nd amendment always being tied to the limitations of the time while all other amendments are free to grow with the rest of the world. Free speech ON THE INTERNET comes to mind.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[penguinman]

I love how they justify this as back in the 18th century purchases took a long time, when reality is they took as long as your neighbor took to state his asking price. "Yeah I'll let it go for $4, sure". Purchase complete.

So much bs

So are they planning on bringing back the ability to mail order a Tommy Gun? Also, I'm poor. I spend at least 10 days deciding on which firearm I'm going to buy prior to actually shelling out the cash for it. But then I have to wait another 10 days because my wannabe parents in Sacramento don't trust me to buy something that dangerous over the counter.

[The Gleam]

So are they planning on bringing back the ability to mail order a Tommy Gun?

In full auto of course, being pre-1934 and all.

Sounds like a plan that fits with their 18th century ideals perfectly.

[Twhite5555]

What a joke I hate California. I am so glad I have moved to a much better place now residing in Colorado. Bought my first handgun took 10 minutes and walked out with it. Received my CCW in less than 5 weeks. California is lost.

[michael0594]

Liberal cesspool strikes again.

[moleculo]

There's already a lengthy thread discussing this case and the expected decision:

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=514592

For those that don't want to read the whole thing, this was a terrible case, argued terribly, and we got the result that was predicted from day 1. The cheerleaders of the forum didn't want to believe that, but here we are. This case has zero chance of getting heard on appeal from here.

[inferno999]

There's already a lengthy thread discussing this case and the expected decision:

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=514592

Nice! Didn't see that.
Now there's a thread for the decision.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[-aK-]

Did they actually say this? How do they walk? The size of those balls alone.... to publish this filth.

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/12/14/14-16840.pdf

Holy cow batman. They did actually say that amongst other filthy drivel.

The men of '70's Boston would have tar and feathered those 3 stooges.

[FNH5-7]

There is, moreover, nothing new in having to wait for the
delivery of a weapon. Before the age of superstores and
superhighways, most folks could not expect to take
possession of a firearm immediately upon deciding to
purchase one. As a purely practical matter, delivery took
time. Our 18th and 19th century forebears knew nothing
about electronic transmissions. Delays of a week or more
were not the product of governmental regulations, but such
delays had to be routinely accepted as part of doing business.

They do realize most people back then bought things like this at the local mercantile or exchange? The only people who did any "waiting" were the shop owners who ordered them for the companies and that wasn't because of the government but because of the time the arms took to get from point A to point B. I am not even an attorney and can make a better argument than the ****en judges.

[curtisfong]

That's the very corrupt Judge Sydney Thomas again.

I keep being told I shouldn't speak poorly of our judges, for fear they might take offense.

And what? Display even more bias? How could their behavior be any more petty and stupid than it already is?