Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > 2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:16 PM
hoffmang's Avatar
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,448
iTrader: 16 / 100%
Default CGF: Silvester v. Harris - Second Waiting Period Unconstitutional

Edited 12/26/17 - SCOTUS docket page: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search....ic/17-342.html

============

Calguns Foundation Sues California Over Firearms Waiting Period


San Carlos, CA (December 23, 2011) – The Calguns Foundation has filed a federal lawsuit against the California Department of Justice and Attorney General Kamala Harris challenging the policy of requiring gun owners to wait at least 10 days before taking possession of an additional firearm. The case is entitled Jeff Silvester et. al. vs. Kamala Harris, et. al.

The Calguns Foundation is joined in the lawsuit, filed today at the District of California Federal District Court in Fresno, by the Second Amendment Foundation and three individual plaintiffs.

“The State has absolutely no reason to infringe the rights of California gun owners who already possess firearms when they buy another one,” said Jason Davis who is the attorney for the plaintiffs. California currently requires the registration of handguns in California. And, beginning January 2014, it will also require the registration of all newly-purchased rifles and shotguns. Notably, California keeps a current database of all residents who are prohibited by state or federal law from owning or possessing firearms.

Individual plaintiffs Jeff Silvester, Michael Poeschl, and Brandon Combs each have firearms registered with the State of California. Mr. Combs and Mr. Silvester also have firearms licenses from the State that constitute ongoing background checks.

“In just about every other state in the U.S., I as a law-abiding gun owner could walk in and, after passing an instant national background check, walk out with a firearm to defend myself in my home,” said Michael Poeschl. “What’s really frustrating is that California is one of the very few states that forces gun owners to register all handguns that they buy. If the State’s database saying that I already lawfully own a gun isn’t proof that I don’t need a ‘cooling-off’ period, then what is?”

“I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State,” noted Jeff Silvester. “It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

“As a collector, I submitted to a Live Scan background check and obtained a Certificate of Eligibility to Possess Firearms from the State of California at my own expense,” said Brandon Combs. “In the Internet era, where every California gun dealer has a computer connected directly to the State’s databases, there is no logical reason to force me to wait 10 days and make another trip simply because California doesn’t want to acknowledge the Certificate that it issued to me. I have registered guns, and I have the State telling me that I can possess guns, but for some reason I can’t exercise my constitutionally protected rights for another ten days? That’s insane.”

“Laws that infringe on the right to purchase arms have to be more than just merely rational and must directly serve important governmental interests,” added Hoffman. “Here, the law is not just irrational but actually contradictory. We filed this case right before Christmas in the hopes that, by next Christmas, gun owners will not suffer this continuing infringement on their right to acquire firearms.”

The complaint is available from http://bit.ly/10daywait

___

The Calguns Foundation (www.calgunsfoundation.org) is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization which serves its members by providing Second Amendment-related education, strategic litigation and the defense of innocent California gun owners from improper or malicious prosecution. The Calguns Foundation seeks to inform government and protect the rights of individuals to acquire, own, and lawfully use firearms in California.

Please remember that freedom isn't free and cases like these to recover your rights cost money. Please donate - It's tax deductible!

-Gene


=====================

Current status, via wildhawker 12-2-2014

Appeal to the 9th Circuit:
Quote:
The opening brief and excerpts of record are due February 23, 2015;

the answering brief is due March 25, 2015;

and the optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. [9332608] (WL) [Entered: 12/02/2014 08:53 AM]
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

Last edited by Librarian; 12-27-2017 at 9:00 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:19 PM
ke6guj's Avatar
ke6guj ke6guj is offline
Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 909
Posts: 23,728
iTrader: 42 / 100%
Default

woo hoo
__________________
Jack



Do you want an AOW or C&R SBS/SBR in CA?

No posts of mine are to be construed as legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:26 PM
mag360 mag360 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 5,175
iTrader: 17 / 100%
Default

Go CGF team go! Beautiful!
__________________
just happy to be here. I like talking about better ways to protect ourselves.

Shop at AMAZON to help Calguns Foundation

CRPA Life Member. Click here to Join.

NRA Member JOIN HERE/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:28 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 19,359
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Bravo! And Merry Christmas to CA gun owners!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:28 PM
safewaysecurity's Avatar
safewaysecurity safewaysecurity is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Contra Costa County
Posts: 6,167
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Yay! This.SHOULD be rather easy to smack down since it really doesn't even survive rational basis.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:29 PM
Bhobbs Bhobbs is online now
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chino CA
Posts: 11,782
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Nice. Keep putting the pressure on them.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:29 PM
thayne thayne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 2,289
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Sweet! Thanks for the birthday present!
__________________
Quote:
"It wasn't a failure of laws," said Amanda Wilcox, who along with her husband, Nick, lobbies for the California chapter of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. "I just don't see how our gun laws could have stopped something like that."
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:29 PM
Robidouxs's Avatar
Robidouxs Robidouxs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,684
iTrader: 37 / 100%
Default

Sweet.
__________________
Life is like having a map with precise directions and exact stops, you find out that your directions and stops change as you progress further down your original map.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:30 PM
Lagduf Lagduf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Placer County
Posts: 675
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Calguns and SAF's XMAS gift to all of us!

From the bottom of my heart, thank you. I could not have asked for me.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gio
It is so nice to drop mags freely even though I do that now with my featureless AR and AK it is not the same as the real thing. Like Coca Cola here in the US compared to Mexico with real sugar not corn syrup!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:34 PM
berto's Avatar
berto berto is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA, USA
Posts: 7,722
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Merry Christmas! Happy Hannukah! Joyous Kwanza! Groovy Solatice!

CGF rocks. The 10 day wait after the first time irks to no end. One trip to parts unknown is fine, the second trip kills too many deals. Thanks guys.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:34 PM
Josh3239 Josh3239 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,143
iTrader: 59 / 100%
Default

Damn, right when I am 10 days away from leaving CA and you guys challenge the 10 day wait!

Seriously though congrats and good luck. CGF is friggin awesome!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:35 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Administrator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cottage Grove, OR
Posts: 44,404
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Hey!

Document drops on Fridays, especially before holidays, are for things you don't want people to notice.

__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."

- Marcus Aurelius
Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.”

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.



Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:36 PM
Chosen_1's Avatar
Chosen_1 Chosen_1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SLO, CA
Posts: 646
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

So, from now until next Christmas is about two weeks, right?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:38 PM
hoffmang's Avatar
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,448
iTrader: 16 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Librarian View Post
Hey!

Document drops on Fridays, especially before holidays, are for things you don't want people to notice.

We thought our friends at CA DOJ BoF needed some holiday cheer and more DROS fees next year! How can we not oblige?

I expect you'll hear more about this case from SAF on boxing day too.

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:50 PM
707electrician's Avatar
707electrician 707electrician is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 2,855
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Nice! One ten day wait is ridiculous enough
__________________
Brian Kelly

PM me for electrical work
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:54 PM
Smokeybehr's Avatar
Smokeybehr Smokeybehr is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CM96xx
Posts: 795
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I wish Brandon had let me know about the lawsuit. I would have been a plaintiff, since I bought one of his ARs, and I already have several guns that I had to wait for.
__________________
Rule #1: Keep your booger hook off the bang-switch!
Cruz/West 2016 - You STILL want to call me a racist tea bagger?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:54 PM
bwiese's Avatar
bwiese bwiese is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 27,605
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 707electrician View Post
Nice! One ten day wait is ridiculous enough
The first 10 day wait is a harder fight, legally speaking.

But a 10day wait for a guy to buy his N+1th gun and who already
has N guns is downright unsupportable for a fundamental right.
__________________

Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA

CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member

No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-23-2011, 3:57 PM
thayne thayne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 2,289
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bwiese View Post
The first 10 day wait is a harder fight, legally speaking.

But a 10day wait for a guy to buy his N+1th gun and who already
has N guns is downright unsupportable for a fundamental right.
May not be required. CA may just throw in the towel and start using NCIS checks like most other states
__________________
Quote:
"It wasn't a failure of laws," said Amanda Wilcox, who along with her husband, Nick, lobbies for the California chapter of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. "I just don't see how our gun laws could have stopped something like that."
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:00 PM
CitaDeL's Avatar
CitaDeL CitaDeL is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 5,841
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by berto View Post
Merry Christmas! Happy Hannukah! Joyous Kwanza! Groovy Solatice!

CGF rocks. The 10 day wait after the first time irks to no end. One trip to parts unknown is fine, the second trip kills too many deals. Thanks guys.
And you forgot Festivus.

Thats okay- Its time to raise a toast to the Calguns Foundation and spread the pre-Christmas cheer...
__________________



Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim -- when he defends himself -- as a criminal. Bastiat

“Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.” Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:01 PM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,278
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default



More seed being sown.

I can hardly wait for some crops to come in (Rossow, Scocca, Peruta, Richards, Pena, etc.).
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:02 PM
ke6guj's Avatar
ke6guj ke6guj is offline
Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 909
Posts: 23,728
iTrader: 42 / 100%
Default

interesting little tidbit:

Quote:
42. Eighteenth, the ten-day waiting periods generally do not apply to lawful transactions involving cane guns, firearms that are not immediately recognizable as firearms, undetectable firearms, wallet guns, unconventional pistols, and zip guns. Penal Code §21740 (exempts from §26815); §27740 (exempts from §27540).
"shotgun-based" AOWs like the Super Shorty are considered unconvetional pistols in CA and would therefore be exempt from the 10-day wait after the Form 4 was approved.


27540
No dealer, whether or not acting pursuant to Chapter 5
(commencing with Section 28050), shall deliver a firearm to a person,
as follows:
(a) Within 10 days of the application to purchase, or, after
notice by the department pursuant to Section 28220, within 10 days of
the submission to the department of any correction to the
application, or within 10 days of the submission to the department of
any fee required pursuant to Section 28225, whichever is later.
(b) Unless unloaded and securely wrapped or unloaded and in a
locked container.
(c) Unless the purchaser, transferee, or person being loaned the
firearm presents clear evidence of the person's identity and age to
the dealer.
(d) Whenever the dealer is notified by the Department of Justice
that the person is prohibited by state or federal law from
possessing, receiving, owning, or purchasing a firearm.
(e) (1) Commencing April 1, 1994, and until January 1, 2003, no
handgun shall be delivered unless the purchaser, transferee, or
person being loaned the firearm presents to the dealer a basic
firearms safety certificate.
(2) Commencing January 1, 2003, no handgun shall be delivered
unless the purchaser, transferee, or person being loaned the handgun
presents a handgun safety certificate to the dealer.
(f) No handgun shall be delivered whenever the dealer is notified
by the Department of Justice that within the preceding 30-day period
the purchaser has made another application to purchase a handgun and
that the previous application to purchase involved none of the
entities specified in subdivision (b) of Section 27535.





27740
Section 27540 does not apply to the sale, delivery, or
transfer of a firearm regulated pursuant to any of the following
statutes
, if the sale, delivery, or transfer of that firearm is
conducted in accordance with the applicable provisions of the
statute:
(a) Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 18710) of Division 5 of
Title 2, relating to destructive devices and explosives.
(b) Section 24410, relating to cane guns, and the exemptions in
Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Title 2, as they relate
to cane guns.
(c) Section 24510, relating to firearms that are not immediately
recognizable as firearms, and the exemptions in Chapter 1 (commencing
with Section 17700) of Title 2, as they relate to firearms that are
not immediately recognizable as firearms.
(d) Sections 24610 and 24680, relating to undetectable firearms,
and the exemptions in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of
Title 2, as they relate to undetectable firearms.
(e) Section 24710, relating to wallet guns, and the exemptions in
Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Title 2, as they relate
to wallet guns.
(f) Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 30500) of Division 10,
relating to assault weapons.
(g) Section 31500, relating to unconventional pistols, and the
exemptions in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Title 2,
as they relate to unconventional pistols.

(h) Sections 33215 to 33225, inclusive, relating to short-barreled
rifles and short-barreled shotguns, and the exemptions in Chapter 1
(commencing with Section 17700) of Title 2, as they relate to
short-barreled rifles and short-barreled shotguns.




and the old code, as far as I can tell,

12078(o) Section 12071 and subdivisions (c),(d), and paragraph (1) of Section 12072 shall not apply to the delivery, sale, or transfer of firearms regulated pursuant to Section 12020, Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 12200), or Chapter 2.3 (commencing with Section 12275), if the delivery, sale, or transfer is conducted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 12020, Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 12200), or Chapter 2.3 (commencing with Section 12275).


that could make getting a "shotgun-based" AOW a one-stop trip instead of a 2-3 stop deal.
__________________
Jack



Do you want an AOW or C&R SBS/SBR in CA?

No posts of mine are to be construed as legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:07 PM
glockman19 glockman19 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 10,487
iTrader: 18 / 100%
Default

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:14 PM
CHS's Avatar
CHS CHS is offline
Moderator Emeritus
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 11,340
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bwiese View Post
The first 10 day wait is a harder fight, legally speaking.

But a 10day wait for a guy to buy his N+1th gun and who already
has N guns is downright unsupportable for a fundamental right.
I still don't understand how ANY wait can survive strict scrutiny or any constitutional scrutiny. I have a right to self defense NOW, not 1, 3, or ten days from now. Plus, if the whole idea is to prevent crime and we've instituted background checks, well the background check is instant. And can the state actually show in court that a background check waiting period truly prevents the so-called "crimes of passion" that it seeks to get rid of? I doubt it.

Anyways. It's still great news. Merry Christmas to me, Merry Christmas to me!

Sometimes I think Gene, Bill, Jason, Brandon and CGF in general are just one big multi-part jolly Santa
__________________
Please read the Calguns Wiki
Quote:
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
--Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:19 PM
ivsamhell's Avatar
ivsamhell ivsamhell is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: victorville
Posts: 2,623
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

the marketplace is going to be a whole new world.
__________________
*anyone could be typing these messages, and probably not while under oath.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:20 PM
sreiter's Avatar
sreiter sreiter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,664
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

LOL - Brilliant!!! We hold these truths to be self-evident. I just wish to god politicians would take their heads out of their lower intestinal tract and see common sense.
__________________


"personal security, personal liberty, and private property"--could not be maintained solely by law, for "in vain would these rights be declared, ascertained, and protected by the dead letter of the laws, if the constitution had provided no other method to secure their actual enjoyment." -
William Blackstone
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:20 PM
OleCuss OleCuss is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 6,441
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I dunno, it feels just a little like Christmas is two days early. And yeah, I know that final resolution will be a long way down the road.

But what I find most interesting is that (IIRC) this was a relatively low priority. This suggests to me that there has been (or this is) a strategic or tactical shift.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:21 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 19,359
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CHS View Post
I still don't understand how ANY wait can survive strict scrutiny or any constitutional scrutiny. I have a right to self defense NOW, not 1, 3, or ten days from now. Plus, if the whole idea is to prevent crime and we've instituted background checks, well the background check is instant. And can the state actually show in court that a background check waiting period truly prevents the so-called "crimes of passion" that it seeks to get rid of? I doubt it.

Anyways. It's still great news. Merry Christmas to me, Merry Christmas to me!

Sometimes I think Gene, Bill, Jason, Brandon and CGF in general are just one big multi-part jolly Santa
Low hanging fruit though. Just sayin. Once this gets picked the rest would be easier to get.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:22 PM
thayne thayne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 2,289
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OleCuss View Post
I dunno, it feels just a little like Christmas is two days early. And yeah, I know that final resolution will be a long way down the road.

But what I find most interesting is that (IIRC) this was a relatively low priority. This suggests to me that there has been (or this is) a strategic or tactical shift.
Maybe the time for shock and awe has arrived
__________________
Quote:
"It wasn't a failure of laws," said Amanda Wilcox, who along with her husband, Nick, lobbies for the California chapter of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. "I just don't see how our gun laws could have stopped something like that."
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:23 PM
SoCal Bob's Avatar
SoCal Bob SoCal Bob is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North San Diego County
Posts: 5,300
iTrader: 38 / 100%
Default

So, I see this, but as usual I don't know what it means - "Seventh, the ten-day waiting periods generally do not apply to persons who have an ―assault weapons‖ permit pursuant to Penal Code section 30500, et seq. Penal Code §21740 (exempts from §26815); §27740 (exempts from §27540)."

Does this mean that someone that has a RAW is exempt from the 10 day wait?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:25 PM
freonr22's Avatar
freonr22 freonr22 is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose
Posts: 12,937
iTrader: 31 / 100%
Default

Happy holidays!
__________________
<img src=http://calgunsfoundation.org/images/stories/San-Benito.jpg border=0 alt= />[IMG]file:///C:/Users/PCMECH%7E1/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot-3.png[/IMG][IMG]file:///C:/Users/PCMECH%7E1/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot-4.png[/IMG]
Quote:
Originally Posted by dantodd View Post
We will win. We are right. We will never stop fighting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwiese View Post
They don't believe it's possible, but then Alison didn't believe there'd be 350K - 400K OLLs in CA either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by louisianagirl View Post
Our fate is ours alone to decide as long as we remain armed heavily enough to dictate it.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:25 PM
ke6guj's Avatar
ke6guj ke6guj is offline
Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 909
Posts: 23,728
iTrader: 42 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCal Bob View Post
So, I see this, but as usual I don't know what it means - "Seventh, the ten-day waiting periods generally do not apply to persons who have an ―assault weapons‖ permit pursuant to Penal Code section 30500, et seq. Penal Code §21740 (exempts from §26815); §27740 (exempts from §27540)."

Does this mean that someone that has a RAW is exempt from the 10 day wait?
AW registration is different from an AW permit.

most of us with RAWs do not have AW permits.
__________________
Jack



Do you want an AOW or C&R SBS/SBR in CA?

No posts of mine are to be construed as legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:28 PM
SoCal Bob's Avatar
SoCal Bob SoCal Bob is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North San Diego County
Posts: 5,300
iTrader: 38 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ke6guj View Post
AW registration is different from an AW permit.

most of us with RAWs do not have AW permits.
Thanks, I figured there had to be more to it.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:33 PM
CHS's Avatar
CHS CHS is offline
Moderator Emeritus
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 11,340
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

So how long until this is delayed pending the Nordyke En Banc?
__________________
Please read the Calguns Wiki
Quote:
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
--Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:34 PM
ke6guj's Avatar
ke6guj ke6guj is offline
Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 909
Posts: 23,728
iTrader: 42 / 100%
Default

__________________
Jack



Do you want an AOW or C&R SBS/SBR in CA?

No posts of mine are to be construed as legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:34 PM
m03's Avatar
m03 m03 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,907
iTrader: 68 / 100%
Default

Great job!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:41 PM
EBR Works's Avatar
EBR Works EBR Works is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 10,398
iTrader: 120 / 100%
Default

Bravo! This is long overdue.
__________________


Check out our e-commerce site here:

www.ebrworks.com

Serving you from Prescott, AZ
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:44 PM
mattmcg's Avatar
mattmcg mattmcg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Norcal
Posts: 897
iTrader: 91 / 100%
Default

Fantastic guys! CGF moving forward again on improving what little freedom the state of CA attempts to allow.....

Great work!
__________________
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Benjamin Franklin, 1755
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:46 PM
CHS's Avatar
CHS CHS is offline
Moderator Emeritus
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 11,340
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Holy crap, this is priceless (reading the complaint):

Quote:
California, however, has placed restrictions on the access to and delivery of firearms – generally subjecting firearm purchasers to a minimum ten-day ban on the delivery of firearms
I never thought of calling the "waiting period" a ban. But this complaint hits the nail right on the head. It's nothing more than a temporary ban.

I'm going to start calling it a 10-day ban now instead of waiting period.
__________________
Please read the Calguns Wiki
Quote:
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
--Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:53 PM
triplestack3's Avatar
triplestack3 triplestack3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,283
iTrader: 33 / 100%
Default

freaking awesome
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-23-2011, 4:53 PM
wildhawker's Avatar
wildhawker wildhawker is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 14,151
iTrader: 84 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thayne View Post
Maybe the time for shock and awe has arrived
You bet your sweet bippy!

-Brandon
__________________
Brandon Combs

I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:02 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy