Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Outside the Box... Bear Box that is:

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    sfpcservice
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 1879

    Originally posted by M14 Junkie
    Well said. Couldn't agree more except that I'm moving to the Tucson area. Already listed my house. Was going to make the move anyway.
    Oh, Im sorry M14 Junkie, I forgot you were here. You may go now...
    Last edited by sfpcservice; 08-08-2016, 9:36 PM.
    sigpic


    John 14:6

    Comment

    • #32
      Fate
      Calguns Addict
      • Apr 2006
      • 9545

      Originally posted by CycloSteve
      The Center for Biological Diversity are the same ones who continue to push for the closure of trails in the Sierras for any sort of recreation, powered, horse, bike, etc. I will never support any of their causes, nor sign their petitions.

      They are eco-Nazis who want to keep people out of OUR public lands, and this is just another way to push their agenda of deeming more of our country as wilderness.
      Yep ban the public but the "scientists" could have free access. No hoi polloi. I've seen this mentality in USFS & USNP personnel. They want to keep us out.
      sigpic "On bended knee is no way to be free." - Eddie Vedder, "Guaranteed"

      "Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks." -Thomas Jefferson
      , in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr dated August 19, 1785

      Comment

      • #33
        sfpcservice
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 1879

        Originally posted by Fate
        Yep ban the public but the "scientists" could have free access. No hoi polloi. I've seen this mentality in USFS & USNP personnel. They want to keep us out.
        I would have to agree with these sentiments. I worked for the US Park Service for quite some time in a National Recreation Area. I can say that the manner in which you could "recreate" was increasingly restrictive year after year. I don'thave a lot of respect for the Park Service, in fact I think we could do without them.
        sigpic


        John 14:6

        Comment

        • #34
          rplaw
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2014
          • 1808

          Originally posted by Californio
          I am all for the Grizzly and Wolf to be introduced, that would mean that the Elk would have to be introduced to feed them and the dams would have to come down so that Salmon could then be reintroduced for the Griz to eat, all these rotting kills would solve the Condor issue as well. California population would decrease, what's not to like.

          All of this would make California like Alaska and chase the candy arsed city sissies back to where they came from or get eaten
          Actually, what you'd see is a new tax being implemented to build a wall to keep the Grizzlies out of SF, LA, and Sac. On one side, the libs. On the other, bear chow.

          Guess which side Conservatives get to live on. While being disarmed. Because the libs are afraid that if we have guns, we could live on their side of the wall and make them live with the bears. Much better for them if we don't have that option.
          Some random thoughts:

          Somebody's gotta be the mole so it might as well be me. Seems to be working so far.

          Evil doesn't only come in black.

          Life is like a discount bakery. Usually everything is just what you ordered. But, occasionally you come face to face with an unexpected fruitcake. Surprise!

          My Utubery

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1