Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

SFPD Officer arrested for manufacturing an assault rifle.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • onelonehorseman
    Veteran Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 4888

    Originally posted by skyscraper
    I dont really want to sort through all the fighting here anymore...


    Whats the update or cliff notes on this? I know the backstory, but someone mentioned posting info online?? Was he turned in by a fellow LEO that was in trouble for something else? Why was he turned in?
    +1. . . any news on the original topic of this thread?
    sigpic

    Comment

    • pacrat
      I need a LIFE!!
      • May 2014
      • 10254

      Originally posted by HardwoodRods
      Not sure what a "cop union" is since when I was LE we were represented by the IAW........
      "Cop Union" colloquial reference to LE Union. Or more accurately ANY union who represents cops. But as a former "LEO" you know what a "cop" is. In some places, even Teamsters negotiate LE contracts.

      Would you please enlighten me as to what "IAW" is? I checked Google, to no avail as to anything to do with labor unions. Unless you were a "I. A. of Welders Cop".

      Acronym finder came up with 48 possibilities. From "International Association of Women", "International Association of Whistleblowers", to "Islamofacism Awareness Week". No help there. And

      http://www.thelaborsite.com/uniondirectory3.cfm doesn't have it listed as a labor union in the US.

      Comment

      • smith629
        Senior Member
        • May 2009
        • 873

        LEO should be held to the same laws as the rest of us in terms of what weapons they can possess personally, however, all these gun laws are written by corrupt politicians (eg. Leeland Yee) and it is a complete waste of resources to arrest and convict this 18-year officer on an AW charge because frankly it is unconstitutional. I wish him luck.

        Comment

        • pacrat
          I need a LIFE!!
          • May 2014
          • 10254

          Originally posted by TRICKSTER
          So private sector unions didn't receive quid pro quo of exemptions when they dropped their opposition to Obamacare?

          Wait a minute, didn't you belong to a private sector union?
          Oh Tricky, just one more sad sack of obsfucatory deflection for all to laugh at. With your "deflection crack" and "obsfucation crack" added to the "denial crack", in your personal mirror. No wonder you can't see yourself clearly or honestly.

          Since this is "Cal-Guns". Not "Cal-HealthIns". A forum where Ca, GUN LAWS are discussed. Just what relevance are you "imagining" that ObamaCare has here?

          And since once again, you obviouly haven't read a thread before you drop in making asinine, and previously refuted, or agreed to, statements. This is a quote by me from post #303.

          ALL UNIONS "now" support democraps. That's a given.
          And doesn't change the FACT that only LE Union members, are given EXEMPTIONS for ANTI 2A Gun Laws.
          Last edited by pacrat; 08-09-2016, 2:36 PM.

          Comment

          • TRICKSTER
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Mar 2008
            • 12438

            Originally posted by pacrat
            Oh Tricky, just one more sad sack of obsfucatory deflection for all to laugh at. With your "deflection crack" and "obsfucation crack" added to the "denial crack", in your personal mirror. No wonder you can't see yourself clearly or honestly.

            Since this is "Cal-Guns". Not "Cal-HealthIns". A forum where Ca, GUN LAWS are discussed. Just what relevance are you "imagining" that ObamaCare has here?

            And since once again, you obviouly haven't read a thread before you drop in making asinine, and previously refuted, or agreed to, statements. This is a quote by me from post #303.



            And doesn't change the FACT that only LE Union members, are given EXEMPTIONS for ANTI 2A Gun Laws.
            Your bloviating doesn't change the words that you posted.

            Originally posted by pacrat

            Only Cops Unions get the symbiotic quid pro quo of exemptions for laws they supported passage of from their political masters.
            I simply pointed out that your claim that only cop unions get a quid pro quote of exemptions is blatantly false, just like many of your comments.

            Plus if I were to use your broad brush, it would make you as a union member, since you believe that all members are responsible for the actions of others if they also receive the benefit, responsible for the largest violation of peoples rights yet, Obamacare.
            So using your logic, not mine, that would make you a hypocrite.
            Last edited by TRICKSTER; 08-09-2016, 2:51 PM.


            Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups

            Comment

            • pacrat
              I need a LIFE!!
              • May 2014
              • 10254

              OOPs, time for a relevant editing. Now we can add the infamous Tricky trick of "out of context" quotes, to the cracks.


              Originally Posted by pacrat
              Oh Tricky, just one more sad sack of obsfucatory deflection for all to laugh at. With your "deflection crack", "obsfucation crack", and now "out of context crack", added to the "denial crack", in your personal mirror.

              No wonder you can't see yourself clearly or honestly.
              Since this is "Cal-Guns". Not "Cal-HealthIns".


              And doesn't change the FACT that only LE Union members, are given EXEMPTIONS for ANTI 2A Gun Laws.


              And as to your other ridiculous, unfounded, ignorant of facts, assertions. Regarding myself. Wrong on all counts.

              NO broad brush, NO union affiliation, NO support for, OR benefit from, ObamaCare.

              ObamaCare is factually detrimental to my health care plan. Just as "Us v Them" you falsely accused me of "encouraging" is a detriment to my rights as a citizen.

              Maybe time to add "prevaricator and hypocrisy" cracks to that mirror of yours.

              Comment

              • wtm75
                Member
                • Jul 2010
                • 156

                Originally posted by roostersgt
                To suggest what you are conveying is called "ANARCHY." I don't agree with a lot of the laws on our books, but I enforce them.
                Did you not take an oath to defend the Constitution? To ignore it would be Tyranny.

                Comment

                • twomanattact
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 668

                  oddly, I had an off duty SFPD officer (don't know his name, so any LEO that wants to know who it was I cannot help, I ONLY had a brief public conversation with him) ask me if I am comfortable finishing an 80 percent and selling it to him a couple weeks ago. I said no, just found it odd that he was comfortable asking.
                  Good guy just I just found it strange that he would ask that.

                  Comment

                  • Kestryll
                    Head Janitor
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 21579

                    Well this has turned to crap.

                    Now to decide if the bans are going to be temporary or permanent.
                    sigpic NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA Life Member / SAF Life Member
                    Calguns.net an incorported entity - President.
                    The Calguns Shooting Sports Assoc. - Vice President.
                    The California Rifle & Pistol Assoc. - Director.
                    DONATE TO NRA-ILA, CGSSA, AND CRPAF NOW!
                    Opinions posted in this account are my own and unless specifically stated as such are not the approved position of Calguns.net, CGSSA or CRPA.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1