SFPD Officer arrested for manufacturing an assault rifle.

[Ralston]

I subscribed to this thread looking for how it will play out for this officer and other LEOs going forward and it's turned into hot garbage and a bickering session. Chill guys.

[Saym14]

so much FUD in the article

[Never Convicted]

this one is getting good ...

[Wiz-of-Awd]

I subscribed to this thread looking for how it will play out for this officer and other LEOs going forward and it's turned into hot garbage and a bickering session. Chill guys.

"Chill' goes right out the window by the end of page 3 on any of these threads.

A.W.D.

[Strongisland]

Was it an assault rifle (select fire) or "assault weapon" that he was arrested for?

Media uses them interchangeably so I wasn't sure.

[TrailerparkTrash]

That said, don't bother with these clowns anymore. Pacrat and gogo obviously have some inferiority complex issues they need to work out.

That right there about sums it up. They have no clue as to what they "think" they are talking about.

I wouldn't even acknowledge the comments from those two on this particular thread any longer, as it appears futile and counter productive.

[RickD427]

Was it an assault rifle (select fire) or "assault weapon" that he was arrested for?

Media uses them interchangeably so I wasn't sure.

Nobody really knows the specifics yet.

The charge corresponds to possession of an "Assault Weapon" as defined in the Penal Code.

In common English usage a "Rifle" is a category of "Weapon." In the absence of an authoritative definition to the contrary, an "Assault Rifle" would be a category of "Assault Weapon."

The issue here is that there is not authoritative definition of "Assault Rifle" in statute. You're free to believe that a rifle must be select fire in order to be an "Assault Rifle" and the next Joe down the street is free to believe that my "Potato Gun" is an "Assault Rifle."

[ceedubG]

I subscribed to this thread looking for how it will play out for this officer and other LEOs going forward and it's turned into hot garbage and a bickering session. Chill guys.

Agreed... As the OP, I wish I never started this thread....

Off thread topic should be discussed elsewhere or at least learn to use Private Messaging!

-Cee

[roostersgt]

No. I would be happier if nobody got charged at all for an unconstitutional law.

You are validating the law by agreeing he should get charged.

To suggest what you are conveying is called "ANARCHY." I don't agree with a lot of the laws on our books, but I enforce them.

[wpage]

Personal issues must be a factor in this...

[pacrat]

I thought your comparison to being an LEO is as much of a choice as living in CA (which equals paying union dues and paying CA taxes) were spot on.

That said, don't bother with these clowns anymore. Pacrat and gogo obviously have some inferiority complex issues they need to work out.

What a sad and sorry response. Not even an attempt to actually take part in a discussion. Has absolutely no pertinent or factual dialog to support an opinion. Just cast unfounded aspersions and run.

Your first sentence in the above quote, portrays you as someone who didn't read the links provided. Or the thread. And "simply" agreed with someone who intentionally misrepresented the factual information included.

Strong accent on the "simply" part.

TrailerparkTrash said,

That right there about sums it up. They have no clue as to what they "think" they are talking about.

I'm disappointed. I've always respected your opinions, even when I didn't agree with them 100%.

Are you upset because I actually don't know what I'm talking about? Or because I do?

From numerous posts you've made, recounting anecdotal experiences. Stations worked, etc. I presumed to deduce which agency you work for. Without naming it. And gave a factual representation of "that" agency's Union structure. And that Union's huge political shift to become an overall, Anti 2A political power [in the last yr].

No longer representing members over only wages & perks, and previously stepping up and supporting anti 2A laws for "citizens", which members were "exempt" from. And then the big leap to actually Lobbying for ALL Anti 2A laws in the legislature.

If I perhaps got the wrong agency PM me the correct one. Let me know, and I will research whichever Union you do belong to, or I will just ask some of your fellow members, and post a correction.

Unions I have belonged to, in chronological order. UA&AW, IAM, UBC&J, and UBC, without the "J".

Not one of which, has ever advocated directly for Gun Control.

So honestly ask yourself and every Pvt & PubSec Union member. Which Unions have specifically supported Gun Control? And to what extent?

[danez71]

. Unions I have belonged to, in chronological order UA&AW, IAM, UBC&J, and UBC, without the "J".

UA - They spread propaganda in support Hillary as evidenced by them linking this http://www.uagetinvolved.org/sites/d...n_vs_trump.pdf

And actually ENDORSES HILLARY http://www.ua.org/latest-news/ua-end...president.aspx


IAM - ENDORSES HILLARY http://www.goiam.org/index.php/news/...-for-president


UBC - ENDORSES HILLARY - https://www.carpenters.org/Politics_...ation/HRC.aspx

[pacrat]

For those reading this thread that weren't born yet. And didn't see events unfold as they happened.

To further support my factual assertion that it was Brown and his actions concerning PubSec Unions. That was solely responsible for Ca becoming and staying a solid Blue Anti Gun State.

Pre Moonbeam Brown, and his 1977 action, we had Gov. Reagan. And Ca. was known as a 'Swing State" with definite "R" leanings.

Gov. Reagan was also the President of the Screen Actors Guild. Prior to his election. His political party affiliation was NOT DEM.

Ca. going down the DemRat Hole. Is solely on Brown, and the massive PubSec Union support he created.

[gogohopper]

UA - They spread propaganda in support Hillary as evidenced by them linking this http://www.uagetinvolved.org/sites/d...n_vs_trump.pdf

And actually ENDORSES HILLARY http://www.ua.org/latest-news/ua-end...president.aspx


IAM - ENDORSES HILLARY http://www.goiam.org/index.php/news/...-for-president


UBC - ENDORSES HILLARY - https://www.carpenters.org/Politics_...ation/HRC.aspx

Lol, it seems you don't even listen to yourself:

Go start a union thread in the OT section if that's all that you want to talk about.

Please stick to the OP : )

[Moto]

To suggest what you are conveying is called "ANARCHY." I don't agree with a lot of the laws on our books, but I enforce them.

You are the type of human our forefathers fought against to gain America's freedoms.
I know that You would happily violate American's rights.




Sorry guys,
This rooster guy makes me sick. Scum.