I know, I know, keep fighting on. At this point for me, that is all I can do, but goddamn it gets old after awhile.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AB 1663- Chiu, 2016 - Dead in Committee
Collapse
X
-
-
So do they want to redefine what a mag lock button release is to be one and the same as a mag release button?
Sent from my SM-N900P using TapatalkOld problems are like dry poop, if you let the dry poop sit it doesn't smell but the minute you decide to stir the poop with a stick, the smell comes back. Moral of the story, Don't bring up old problems!Comment
-
Here we go... again
NRA Member
NRA-ILA Contributor
CGN Contributor
iTrader Feedback
1bulletBarney iTrader Feedback - Calguns.net?Comment
-
We better win the presidential election. If the Supreme Court won't hear cases upholding their previous decisions about 'in common use'... then this stuff will pass and stand.
Ironically; this stuff is to distract voters from other issues in the election... but gun rights are still important so pursing it could still cause them to lose (nationally).Comment
-
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page
Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!Comment
-
The current law prohibits "rifle with detachable magazine," which is what bullet button prevents - detachable magazine.
The new language would ban rifles that "can accept a detachable magazine." Very similar, but it goes after the ability to accept a detachable magazine, not the ability to detach a magazine. A rifle with bullet button *can accept* a detachable magazine because that's what happens when one replaces the magazine.sigpicNRA Benefactor MemberComment
-
-
Here's the key change in AB 1663:
(d) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) "Detachable magazine" means an ammunition feeding device that can be removed readily from the firearm without disassembly of the firearm action.
(2) "Fixed magazine" means an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action.
Also has provisions for people who lawfully acquired "assault weapons" prior to 12/31/2016 to register them, by 7/1/2018.
If I'm reading this properly... This re-opens assault weapon registration, with bullet button rifles eligible. If you own a registered, legal assault weapon, it's legal to have a traditional magazine release on it, right?Last edited by CalAlumnus; 01-14-2016, 6:18 PM.Comment
-
They can outright ban possession, or they can reopen registry. They can ban already registered RAWs, or they can let them be. They can go after "pistol grip + magazine" and allow featureless, or they can go after ALL semi-automatic rifles and ban featureless with detachable magazine. They can also go after all featureless regardless of magazine type.
Each option requires different level of tinkering with the current law and can have different unintended consequences.
It's easy to say "They'll ban all centerfire semi-automatic rifles, full stop." Whether they will try is another issue. If their calculation is that SCOTUS won't do a thing and that they control district and circuit courts, they might as well do it this time. Are they going to? Nobody knows.sigpicNRA Benefactor MemberComment
-
These stupid effers are trying to ban virtually every semi auto rifle, including the Mini-14, the M1 Carbine, the M1 Garand, and hundreds of different hunting rifles. This is what happens when people who know nothing about guns try to write gun laws. Serious over reach.Comment
-
Time to start hanging the bastardsComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,858,330
Posts: 25,043,373
Members: 354,731
Active Members: 5,926
Welcome to our newest member, Juan1302.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3794 users online. 126 members and 3668 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment