Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Tea Leaf Reading on St. Benitez Timing????

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paul49
    Member
    • May 2016
    • 230

    Or just copy and paste substituting assault weapon with standard capacity magazine…..

    Or maybe “Find and Replace”?
    Last edited by Paul49; 05-03-2023, 5:20 PM.
    4/19/21 applied, 8/31 Whittier interview.
    11/17 PTT email, docs sent 11/18
    12/13 call for pick up, picked up 12/15/21.
    Utah CCW since March 2018 and Arizona since June 2022
    Mailed renewal 5/8/23, online 11/6, interview 11/15
    11/26 PTT and docs submitted, 11/29 approved
    Pickup 12/20

    Comment

    • Mithrandir13
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 898

      democrat villains will delay and delay until SCOTUS is stacked to their liking...
      .
      .
      .
      The founding fathers did a wonderful thing when they included the second amendment to the constitution...

      Yes... and this! http://www.constitution.org/2ll/2ndschol/87senrpt.pdf

      Good Guys with Guns HERE

      Comment

      • IronsightsRifleman
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2020
        • 770

        Originally posted by Bhobbs
        I doubt any of Benitez? rulings make it to SCOTUS, well maybe the ammo case. AWBs and mag bans will probably be handled by Bianchi and the 7th circuit. Benitez hasn?t even gotten his rulings out and the 9th will slow walk these cases as much as possible.
        SCOTUS GVRd these cases to the 9th. It was the 9th decision to send them back to Benitez. I am no expert, but couldn't the plaintiffs make a strong case that the 9th Circuit relinquished their rights to hear any further appeals in doing so?

        Comment

        • Drivedabizness
          Veteran Member
          • Dec 2009
          • 2610

          IANAL but 9CA was within their rights to send back to Benitez - but only to retry facts under the new standard of THT (which he has tried to do).

          If/when he comes back with the solid ruling based on those facts, that we all expect, we can only hope SCOTUS steps in when the 9CA follows their pattern of disregarding 2A rights.
          Proud CGN Contributor
          USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot
          Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools

          Comment

          • Bhobbs
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Feb 2009
            • 11842

            Originally posted by IronsightsRifleman
            SCOTUS GVRd these cases to the 9th. It was the 9th decision to send them back to Benitez. I am no expert, but couldn't the plaintiffs make a strong case that the 9th Circuit relinquished their rights to hear any further appeals in doing so?
            Sure, it was their right but they didn?t do it to get a clean slate and do the historical analysis. They did it to stall the inevitable fall of the AWB.

            Comment

            • michigander
              Member
              • Apr 2018
              • 113

              Originally posted by IronsightsRifleman
              SCOTUS GVRd these cases to the 9th. It was the 9th decision to send them back to Benitez. I am no expert, but couldn't the plaintiffs make a strong case that the 9th Circuit relinquished their rights to hear any further appeals in doing so?
              SCOTUS only GVRd Duncan. The other cases were in varying stages of review at the 9th.

              Comment

              • TruOil
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2017
                • 1921

                Originally posted by IronsightsRifleman
                SCOTUS GVRd these cases to the 9th. It was the 9th decision to send them back to Benitez. I am no expert, but couldn't the plaintiffs make a strong case that the 9th Circuit relinquished their rights to hear any further appeals in doing so?
                No, it has not waived anything. Since it went back to the trial court for a retrial/reconsieration, it will be a new judgment that will follow the usual appellate path after Benitez issues his judgment.

                Comment

                • Drivedabizness
                  Veteran Member
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 2610

                  It's Friday...I'm hoping for today at 4:58 pm.
                  Proud CGN Contributor
                  USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot
                  Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools

                  Comment

                  • ritter
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2011
                    • 805

                    If I were releasing opinions, I'd now be waiting until after SCOTUS responds to the Illinois/CA7 AWB fiasco. If SCOTUS makes a substantive response (big if), there may be some real nuggets to include for CA9's viewing pleasure when reviewing the stay requests Bonta will file.

                    Comment

                    • DolphinFan
                      Veteran Member
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 2522

                      Well it?s Friday and it?s Cinco De Mayo.
                      Maybe he will give us another reason to toast the margarita 🥂🙏
                      10/15/2022 - Called to get on the list
                      2/18/2023 - Interview set
                      4/27/2023 - Class
                      4/30/2023 - Live Scan
                      5/9/2023 - Interview
                      6/26/2023 - Approval Letter
                      8/1/2023 - Issued

                      Comment

                      • Rickybillegas
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2022
                        • 1498

                        Originally posted by Mithrandir13
                        democrat villains will delay and delay until SCOTUS is stacked to their liking...
                        .
                        .
                        .
                        They are along with compliant media trying to (false) scandal Thomas to bits.
                        And his wife too. Pressuring him to resign
                        I doubt that he will. He's way too strong an individual to bow to their pressure.
                        The other conservative justices are way too young and have many years ahead of them. As long as we keep them from overcoming a filibuster, court packing won't happen either.

                        Comment

                        • tenemae
                          code Monkey
                          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                          • Jun 2010
                          • 1680

                          Originally posted by ritter
                          If I were releasing opinions, I'd now be waiting until after SCOTUS responds to the Illinois/CA7 AWB fiasco. If SCOTUS makes a substantive response (big if), there may be some real nuggets to include for CA9's viewing pleasure when reviewing the stay requests Bonta will file.
                          Given that Miller was GVR'd once already, I suspect you're right. This could be a long spring.

                          Comment

                          • SpudmanWP
                            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                            CGN Contributor
                            • Jul 2017
                            • 1156

                            Duncan was GVR'd, not Miller.
                            Miller was being held pending Bruen at the 9th and was never heard at the 9th.
                            Miller was remanded by the 9th after Bruen GVR'd Duncan.

                            Comment

                            • AlmostHeaven
                              Veteran Member
                              • Apr 2023
                              • 3808

                              Bianchi v. Frosh is the assault weapons ban case that the Supreme Court GVRed after Bruen, so the confusion is understandable.

                              Bianchi challenges the Maryland assault weapons ban in the Fourth Circuit. We are still painfully waiting for the decision on that, so that it can then be appealed back up to SCOTUS.

                              A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

                              The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.

                              Comment

                              • SpudmanWP
                                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                                CGN Contributor
                                • Jul 2017
                                • 1156

                                Another Friday.... come & gone

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1