Nguyen vs Becerra 2020-Dec: USDC SDCA: challenge new 1 in 30

[Librarian]

https://www.saf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Nguyen-et-al-v.-Becerra-et-al-Complaint-ECF-Filed.pdf

[MJB]

Fingers crossed

[HowardW56]

Notice of Related Cases

FPC Release

[Paladin]

[BeAuMaN]

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18759616/nguyen-v-becerra/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

Last movement was 5/19/2021.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.casd.695583/gov.uscourts.casd.695583.14.0.pdf

This is the scheduling conference that gives the deadline to various actions/motions. Final scheduled pre-trial conference will be 3/18/2022.

So expect various filings before that date and a hearing after that date. Early on in the case plaintiffs filed Notice of Related Cases as per Local Rule 40.1(f), likely to try to get Benitez assigned to their case, however it seems they were assigned William Q. Hayes, who I'm not aware off the top of my head whether he's on any other gun cases in the Southern District.

District Judge Robert Benitez is currently assigned to Duncan, Miller, and Fouts, while Renna is assigned to Chief District Judge Dana M Sabraw, though according to Local Rule 40.1.(a) it could be reassigned at any time with consent.

[Paladin]

[9Cal_OC]

[pacrat]

Since I seriously doubt that Demrats will ever be able to support a THT defense of this law, per Bruen.

I believe that Ms Nguyen will get a slam dunk on default.

[FirearmFino]

ORDER Requesting Supplemental Briefs.

[BAJ475]

Since I seriously doubt that Demrats will ever be able to support a THT defense of this law, per Bruen.

I believe that Ms Nguyen will get a slam dunk on default.

I do not know about a slam dunk and I seriously doubt a default. It's not just this law but nearly every CA firearm restriction will have tough going against THT. Thomas not only gave us a sword he gave us nukes!

[pacrat]

Originally Posted by pacrat View Post
Since I seriously doubt that Demrats will ever be able to support a THT defense of this law, per Bruen.

I believe that Ms Nguyen will get a slam dunk on default.

I do not know about a slam dunk and I seriously doubt a default. It's not just this law but nearly every CA firearm restriction will have tough going against THT. Thomas not only gave us a sword he gave us nukes!

Ms Nguyen and all other citizens of Ca. Already had protection against this law under the Heller "common use" ruling. But now, since Bruen, the fancy legal dance, known as "The Leftist 2-Step" is no more. And that the "THT" criteria is in place.

Justice Thomas was brilliant. The 9th just losing the 2-step, to dance around Heller. Would have assured a win.

I call that a "Double Whammy Slam Dunk".

I know that's not "proper legalese". But hey WTF, winning is winning, no matter how you label it.

[Paladin]

Next step and when?

ETA: Judge Hayes is wasting no time. Supplemental briefs in support of their MSJs were due July 29 and briefs in opposition to opponent’s supplemental briefs were due Aug 12. I assume the next step is a decision on the cross MSJs?

[marcusrn]

Important case, stay strong Michelle Nguyen, John Pillips, Darrin Prince, Dominic Boguski, Jay Medina, Frankie Colletti! You are true patriots!

[ziegenbock]

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18759616/nguyen-v-becerra/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

HAYES, Judge:
Before the Court is the parties’ Third Joint Motion and Stipulation to Amend
Supplemental Briefing Order. (ECF No. 45.) Having considered the motion and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court finds good cause to GRANT the parties’
motion.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Amended Supplemental Briefing
Order (ECF No. 40) is amended as follows: Each party’s reply brief is simultaneously due on or before October 10, 2022.
Dated: October 4, 2022
Case 3:20-cv-02470-WQH-MDD Document 46 Filed 10/04/2

[command_liner]

OK, so where are the reply briefs?