Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Renna v Bonta - US Dist Ct So Cal, 11/2020 (Roster: PI granted and stayed 3-31-23)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Drivedabizness
    Veteran Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 2610

    Originally posted by Dvrjon
    This appears to be the public viewing site; no account required.
    A gentleman and a scholar. Thank you
    Proud CGN Contributor
    USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot
    Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools

    Comment

    • JiuJitsu
      Member
      • Dec 2020
      • 345

      Originally posted by AlmostHeaven
      I wish the counsel representing gun rights organizations the best of luck!

      Even though the judicial composition of the forum may be unfriendly, their work is critical for advancing the nationwide fight to defend and restore the Second Amendment rights of every American. Everyone in the firearms community, including people outside of California, owe the legal teams a degree of gratitude.
      100% this.

      Huge respect and appreciation to all of these good people on the legal teams in all these cases. They are doing a fantastic job fighting the good fight.

      Comment

      • Drivedabizness
        Veteran Member
        • Dec 2009
        • 2610

        Originally posted by Dvrjon
        This appears to be the public viewing site; no account required.
        Judges just came in - hearing another case at present
        Last edited by Drivedabizness; 08-23-2023, 9:35 AM.
        Proud CGN Contributor
        USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot
        Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools

        Comment

        • CGZ
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2014
          • 990

          Originally posted by Drivedabizness
          I went there and no activity....

          Are judges sometimes late??
          It just started.

          Comment

          • abinsinia
            Veteran Member
            • Feb 2015
            • 4113

            Well the first slate of judges is not good, but they claim they are only handling two cases, not this one.

            Comment

            • LW6PPC
              Junior Member
              • Feb 2017
              • 62

              Originally posted by Dvrjon
              This appears to be the public viewing site; no account required.
              Wrong court link. Does anyone have the correct link?

              Comment

              • CGZ
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2014
                • 990

                Originally posted by LW6PPC
                Wrong court link. Does anyone have the correct link?


                Comment

                • SpudmanWP
                  CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                  CGN Contributor
                  • Jul 2017
                  • 1156

                  The schedule page is broken

                  Comment

                  • CGZ
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2014
                    • 990

                    Originally posted by SpudmanWP
                    The schedule page is broken

                    Comment

                    • SpudmanWP
                      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                      CGN Contributor
                      • Jul 2017
                      • 1156

                      I found the the new page for today here:

                      Comment

                      • abinsinia
                        Veteran Member
                        • Feb 2015
                        • 4113

                        Oh, no .. This is a bad panel .. Two Clinton judges, and one Trump judge.

                        Comment

                        • CGZ
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2014
                          • 990

                          Renna v. Bonta has begun.

                          Comment

                          • Drivedabizness
                            Veteran Member
                            • Dec 2009
                            • 2610

                            Live update: Defendants counsel says applicable analogues are Massachusetts proving laws. Recognizes no real limit on the ability of the State to mandate features.

                            I guess he doesn't get one State being an outlier does not an analogue make.
                            Proud CGN Contributor
                            USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot
                            Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools

                            Comment

                            • CGZ
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2014
                              • 990

                              They are mainly arguing about the feasibility of microstamping.

                              Comment

                              • Drivedabizness
                                Veteran Member
                                • Dec 2009
                                • 2610

                                Judge is trying very hard to say there WERE analogues and mischaracterizing Plaintiffs argument "that we can have any guns we want"
                                Proud CGN Contributor
                                USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot
                                Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1