That's right, it's so easy to get all these cases mixed up.
I've come around to accepting that mag bans like Duncan are de facto gun bans, not unlike AW bans; i.e., they are bans on guns in common use for lawful purposes that have a capacity greater than 10, and should be squashed a la Heller. Let's just dispense with the anti-gun narrative that magazines are "accoutrements" or whatever.
I've come around to accepting that mag bans like Duncan are de facto gun bans, not unlike AW bans; i.e., they are bans on guns in common use for lawful purposes that have a capacity greater than 10, and should be squashed a la Heller. Let's just dispense with the anti-gun narrative that magazines are "accoutrements" or whatever.

Comment