Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JiuJitsu
    Member
    • Dec 2020
    • 345

    Comment

    • SpudmanWP
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
      CGN Contributor
      • Jul 2017
      • 1156

      Keep an eye on the CourtListener site and you can download it when it's posted.

      It will be a good reference resource.

      Comment

      • abinsinia
        Veteran Member
        • Feb 2015
        • 4113

        Originally posted by 1911su16b870
        CA DOJ AG says 700,000 machine guns from ATF...but didn't bother understanding or looking at those held in private hands which is much much less than the 200,000 stun guns argued in Catano.
        The Federal District Judge immergut in her ruling on the TRO for Oregon's Measure 114 made similar statements regarding machine guns and basically endorsed this view point that common use is dead etc.

        page 21 footnote 13,



        Comment

        • SpudmanWP
          CGN/CGSSA Contributor
          CGN Contributor
          • Jul 2017
          • 1156

          Perhaps SCOTUS did not know the number of machine guns at the time of Heller as it was not part of the record. Given public misconceptions about the number, I could easily see SCOTUS toss the NFA using several rulings (numbers and illegal tax).

          Comment

          • SpudmanWP
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
            CGN Contributor
            • Jul 2017
            • 1156

            The last sentence in that quote destroys their argument.

            but also the nature of that firearm’s use among civilians.
            Given that 99%+ of semi-auto rifles are used for lawful purposes, they have no leg to stand on to ban them, even using their flawed logic.

            Comment

            • ar15barrels
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Jan 2006
              • 56981

              Originally posted by SpudmanWP
              I'm sure it will not be on the same day. However, Judge Benitez will be keeping up with the submissions as they happen and will be forming his order as they come in.

              I don't think it will be much longer after the last briefs are submitted.
              I could see decision/orders published by July 3rd 2023.
              Randall Rausch

              AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
              Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
              Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
              Barrel, sight and trigger work on most pistols and shotguns.
              Most work performed while-you-wait.

              Comment

              • SpudmanWP
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                CGN Contributor
                • Jul 2017
                • 1156

                I doubt that it will take that long. Remember that this is just the Preliminary Injunction phase and the re-trial has not even happened yet.

                Comment

                • SpudmanWP
                  CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                  CGN Contributor
                  • Jul 2017
                  • 1156

                  I would love if it dropped on 4/1/22

                  Comment

                  • Metal God
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 1838

                    I doubt that it will take that long. Remember that this is just the Preliminary Injunction phase and the re-trial has not even happened yet
                    Judge made it clear he sees no reason for further testimony or hearings . He is indicating this is the final step in all these cases . He said he has read and researched enough in all these cases , its time for both sides have final answers.
                    Tolerate
                    allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference.

                    Anyone else find it sad that those who preach tolerance CAN'T allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that they do not necessarily like or agree with) without interference.

                    I write almost everything in a jovial manner regardless of content . If that's not how you took it please try again

                    Comment

                    • SpudmanWP
                      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                      CGN Contributor
                      • Jul 2017
                      • 1156

                      That would be awsome!!!
                      Last edited by SpudmanWP; 12-12-2022, 2:46 PM.

                      Comment

                      • SpudmanWP
                        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                        CGN Contributor
                        • Jul 2017
                        • 1156

                        So, final for both Miller and Duncan?

                        Comment

                        • Mongo68
                          Member
                          • May 2010
                          • 240

                          Originally posted by SpudmanWP
                          I would love if it dropped on 4/1/22
                          4/15 would be rather funny...

                          Comment

                          • ritter
                            Senior Member
                            • May 2011
                            • 805

                            Originally posted by abinsinia
                            The Federal District Judge immergut in her ruling on the TRO for Oregon's Measure 114 made similar statements regarding machine guns and basically endorsed this view point that common use is dead etc.

                            page 21 footnote 13,

                            https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...70381.39.0.pdf
                            This needs to be corrected for the state immediately. It's about as disingenuous as "dangerous [or] unusual."

                            Comment

                            • Metal God
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2013
                              • 1838

                              Finality for all four or five including the billy club/Baton case .
                              Tolerate
                              allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference.

                              Anyone else find it sad that those who preach tolerance CAN'T allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that they do not necessarily like or agree with) without interference.

                              I write almost everything in a jovial manner regardless of content . If that's not how you took it please try again

                              Comment

                              • ritter
                                Senior Member
                                • May 2011
                                • 805

                                Originally posted by Metal God
                                Finality for all four or five including the billy club/Baton case .
                                Thanks so very much for the first hand account to you and the others who attended.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1