Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24
Collapse
X
-
On what grounds would the state have to get a new judge? Simply, "I don't like that he cares about the Constitution" isn't cause for a new judge. Plaintiffs should seek an injunction ASAP as we all know Benitez will grant it.It is possible he can do this, but I have no doubt the State will complain they would like the opportunity to re-litigate the entire case, preferably with a different judge.
I am not a lawyer, though, so I don't know if there is anything that makes this impossible.
Whatever conventions/rules are in place, I'm sure the 9th will find a way to defy them in a way to assist the State with whatever they need to win.Last edited by Roswell Saucer; 08-01-2022, 5:47 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Just un ****ing believable with these people. Just a reminder they hate you and everything you people stand for. When we win, rub it in their faces. There is no winning graciously here, they want to imprison you for your rights.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Just saw a YouTube short from Reno May stating that this case was remanded back down to the district court (in this case Judge Benitez). He will likely rule in favor of the 2A again, though I wonder how he'd handle implementation of a stay this time. Could be in for another 'freedom week' in the coming months.Comment
-
The question is if "remand for further proceedings" results in a new trial (and/or judge) or not, and whether or not Benitez can flatly deny a new trial is needed.
Any lawyers know if there is anything Benitez can do to prevent a new trial, with a new judge? Can he just file new orders that are "consistent" with Bruen, by fiat?
If not, I predict a new trial, with a new judge, and a win for Bonta at the district court, and the 9th, then yet another appeal to SCOTUS, this time without a conservative majority - in 20 years.Last edited by curtisfong; 08-01-2022, 6:01 PM.Comment
-
It goes back to Benitez. California doesn't get to choose a new judge because their fee fees are hurted.The question is if "remand for further proceedings" results in a new trial (and/or judge) or not, and whether or not Benitez can flatly deny a new trial is needed.
Any lawyers know if there is anything Benitez can do to prevent a new trial, with a new judge? Can he just file new orders that are "consistent" with Bruen, by fiat?
If not, I predict a new trial, with a new judge, and a win for Bonta at the district court, and the 9th, then yet another appeal to SCOTUS, this time without a conservative majority - in 20 years.Comment
-
Comment
-
Not thinking Reno May is the go-to for legal opinion, do as you see fit.Just saw a YouTube short from Reno May stating that this case was remanded back down to the district court (in this case Judge Benitez). He will likely rule in favor of the 2A again, though I wonder how he'd handle implementation of a stay this time. Could be in for another 'freedom week' in the coming months.If you don't know where you are going, any road will take you thereComment
-
From what I can tell from the 9th Circuit's order it's now immediately back under Benitez's jurisdiction. I feel like plaintiff should immediately file for an injunction. Benitez would undoubtedly grant it. Then, if California appeals which they certainly would, it can be fast tracked all the way to SCOTUS. I suspect Justice Thomas and rest of the the Bruen Six are less than pleased with the 9th's obstinance.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,857,414
Posts: 25,031,594
Members: 354,385
Active Members: 6,341
Welcome to our newest member, JU83.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3369 users online. 145 members and 3224 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment