Permanent injunction inbound
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24
Collapse
X
-
-
The process would be something like this:
Miller to benitez: We want an injunction because the law is unconstitutional, and our case is likely to succeed on its merits.
Bonta to benitez: We don't want the injunction because we want to maintain the status quo.
Benitez: Law is enjoined because its unconstitional.
Bonta to 9th: kill the injunction until the case is finalized.
9th: okLast edited by ar15barrels; 08-01-2022, 8:49 PM.Randall Rausch
AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
Barrel, sight and trigger work on most pistols and shotguns.
Most work performed while-you-wait.Comment
-
I like this. I like this a lot. Hoping the time frame is very expedient.From what I can tell from the 9th Circuit's order it's now immediately back under Benitez's jurisdiction. I feel like plaintiff should immediately file for an injunction. Benitez would undoubtedly grant it. Then, if California appeals which they certainly would, it can be fast tracked all the way to SCOTUS. I suspect Justice Thomas and rest of the the Bruen Six are less than pleased with the 9th's obstinance.Comment
-
Perhaps I'm more sanguine than you but I think Benitez will issue an injunction as soon as the motion comes before him. Then we get to see what the 9th will do and, presumably, eventually SCOTUS. I feel like this could happen fairly quickly because Bonta will be crying in his soy latte and we all know how California gets preferential treatment in circuit court.Comment
-
-
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,857,335
Posts: 25,030,731
Members: 354,385
Active Members: 6,367
Welcome to our newest member, JU83.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 2084 users online. 44 members and 2040 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment