Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24

[kenl]

Serious question - we know it's likely to happen but what can we do to recall judges who do stuff that's clearly and blatantly against the filings and rule politically?

The only way to get rid of a federal judge is through impeachment.

[rplaw]

The only way to get rid of a federal judge is through impeachment.

It's not the only way but we don't talk about, or consider, the other methods because we are peaceful and peace loving.

[AKSOG]

How screwed are they if they don't get the appeals court to issue the stay by Friday like they are requesting?

[sheepdawg]

It's not the only way but we don't talk about, or consider, the other methods because we are peaceful and peace loving.

[abinsinia]

There a new document,

Filed (ECF) Appellants Rob Bonta and Luis Lopez reply to response (). Date of service: 06/16/2021. [12145585] [21-55608] (Echeverria, John) [Entered: 06/16/2021 08:43 AM]

[abinsinia]

Here's the response.

[CandG]

On the other hand, unlike a flood of untraceable magazines, all new ARs sold in this state will be subject to a background check and registration with the state.

It's cute how Sydney Thomas thought that staying Duncan was going to stop magazines from coming into the state I suspect all it did was stop people from making traceable (online/store) purchases, and go back to the old ways of doing it.

The sad irony is that people won’t use their Second Amendment rights in order to protect their Second Amendment rights. It makes you wonder what’s the point?

"Why are all you kettles so black??"

[taperxz]

Here's the response.

So, the State is asking for a stay pending En Banc without even knowing what the appeals court will say???

Has this happened before?

[CandG]

So, the State is asking for a stay pending En Banc without even knowing what the appeals court will say???

Has this happened before?

Fairly normal. What their request says is,

In the event that a three-judge panel denies a stay, Defendants
respectfully request an administrative stay to preserve the status quo until
such time as Defendants have had an opportunity to seek further relief from
the en banc Court or the Supreme Court.

Basically they're just covering their bases - they think they'll win, but in case they don't, they want alternative relief in the form of an extension of the stay until the en banc request and trial (if granted) is complete.

[abinsinia]

Is the 18th a federal Juneteenth holiday ? There was a recent vote in the Senate.

EDIT: Looks line no.

So they have 3 days including today to rule on this.

[rplaw]

Here's the response.

Typical AG whine about how the world is going to end unless the appeals court continues to deny the people their Constitutional Rights by staying the case until the appeals court can overturn it via the shenanigans they've been using for decades now.

[FirearmFino]

REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY MOTION UNDER CIRCUIT RULE 27-3 TO STAY JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL

[gobler]

REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY MOTION UNDER CIRCUIT RULE 27-3 TO STAY JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL

So, did the 9th stay? Trying to read this on a cell phone is difficult.

[Librarian]

So, did the 9th stay? Trying to read this on a cell phone is difficult.

Not yet - but remember Benitez stayed the ruling for 30 days when he issued it.

[darkwater34]

So really no just cause for an emergency stay there is already one in place.