Nichols is really really slow , to be fair.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nichols Vs. Newsom (was Brown) update...
Collapse
X
-
They are waiting for him to die. There is no particular reason that this case should still be pending after all these years, but it might have something to do with Nichols being in pro per and not a lawyer on the one hand and the court's unwillingness to consider this as anything but a nuisance lawsuit on the other. The court really is averse to ruling on the issues presented.Comment
-
They are waiting for him to die. There is no particular reason that this case should still be pending after all these years, but it might have something to do with Nichols being in pro per and not a lawyer on the one hand and the court's unwillingness to consider this as anything but a nuisance lawsuit on the other. The court really is averse to ruling on the issues presented.Comment
-
L.R. 83-9.2 Joint Request for Decision filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols and Defendant Rob Bonta re: Reply (Motion related) 218, Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Terminate Hearings,,,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines,,, 211, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment 204 (Nichols, Charles) (Entered: 02/10/2025)
Seems they are getting anxious for the judge to act. They've been waiting since October 4, 2024.👍 1Comment
-
COUNSELS' JOINT FOLLOW-UP REQUEST TO ESTABLISH AN INTENDED DECISION DATE IN A SUBMITTED MATTER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 83-9.4 FOLLOW-UP DUTY OF COUNSEL (Nichols, Charles) (Entered: 03/19/2025)Comment
-
From Charles Nichols’ website: The Court has set an intended decision date of May 30th.
The decision could come sooner.
Please donateComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,848,643
Posts: 24,927,924
Members: 352,138
Active Members: 6,400
Welcome to our newest member, Dbrewbrew.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 2320 users online. 88 members and 2232 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment