Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Nichols Vs. Newsom (was Brown) update...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Elgatodeacero
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 1279

    this entire 2nd Amendment litigation exercise now seems pretty pointless in the face of denial of cert in Keo v. Mass.?

    Comment

    • AlmostHeaven
      Veteran Member
      • Apr 2023
      • 3808

      Infuriating but not unexpected, the Supreme Court only grants certiorari to about 100 cases per term, out of a pool of over 8,000 petitions.
      A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

      The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.

      Comment

      • abinsinia
        Veteran Member
        • Feb 2015
        • 4077

        MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS ORDER LIFTING STAY and Setting New Case Management Deadlines by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott.IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the stay of this action is lifted. In light of the five-month stay of these proceedings, the deadline to complete discovery is hereby extended by fivemonths from today's date, and all other deadlines are extended accordingly (as set forth below). All other provisions of the December 9, 2022 Case Management and Scheduling Order remain in effect.(see document for details) MD JS-5 Case Reopened. (mba) (Entered: 01/11/2024)
        New dates for briefings and hearings.

        Comment

        • AlmostHeaven
          Veteran Member
          • Apr 2023
          • 3808

          I thought when the Supreme Court rejects a petition for certiorari, the case ends. Instead, Nichols v. Newsom has returned to the district court? Have the appeals been interlocutory?
          A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

          The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.

          Comment

          • abinsinia
            Veteran Member
            • Feb 2015
            • 4077

            Originally posted by AlmostHeaven
            I thought when the Supreme Court rejects a petition for certiorari, the case ends. Instead, Nichols v. Newsom has returned to the district court? Have the appeals been interlocutory?
            Yes. I think he had a final judgement from the district court prior to Bruen then they vacated that.

            Comment

            • snailbait
              Member
              • Jun 2019
              • 130

              There may have never been a final judgement.

              Comment

              • AlmostHeaven
                Veteran Member
                • Apr 2023
                • 3808

                I see. If the petition for certiorari existed on an interlocutory basis, then I feel even less surprised that the Supreme Court denied the application.
                A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

                The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.

                Comment

                • Paladin
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 12376

                  Last edited by Paladin; 06-27-2024, 4:15 PM.
                  240+ examples of CCWs Saving Lives.

                  Comment

                  • Sgt Raven
                    Veteran Member
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 3783

                    Historically Nichols is right.
                    But as in Heller, where handguns are the preferred choice of Americans today, even though historically they were not.
                    sigpic
                    DILLIGAF
                    "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
                    "Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
                    "The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"

                    Comment

                    • 7.62mm_fmj
                      Member
                      • Nov 2019
                      • 194

                      Yea but could the argument be tailored more specifically? Like OC bans in certain cities may be lawful, but not outside a city.

                      Comment

                      • TruOil
                        Senior Member
                        • Jul 2017
                        • 1929

                        Originally posted by Sgt Raven

                        Historically Nichols is right.
                        But as in Heller, where handguns are the preferred choice of Americans today, even though historically they were not.
                        True, but there are now a majority of states that have so-called "constitutional carry," and this will likely influence the decision--if a case raising the issue ever gets there. At the rate his case is going, I have to wonder if Nichols will live to see that day.

                        Comment

                        • abinsinia
                          Veteran Member
                          • Feb 2015
                          • 4077

                          NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Robert Bonta. Motion set for hearing on 9/17/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (Hasan, Iram) (Entered: 07/24/2024)


                          MEMORANDUM in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment 204 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Robert Bonta. (Hasan, Iram) (Entered: 07/24/2024)
                          Last edited by abinsinia; 07-25-2024, 11:28 AM.

                          Comment

                          • abinsinia
                            Veteran Member
                            • Feb 2015
                            • 4077

                            They seems to completely miss the fact that this case is about open carry of a shotgun and not about handguns.

                            Comment

                            • 7.62mm_fmj
                              Member
                              • Nov 2019
                              • 194

                              Ah let's flip Bruen on it's head and sneak in "unlicensed" at the first step. The AG will AG.

                              unlicensed, open carriage of firearms.

                              Comment

                              • mshill
                                Veteran Member
                                • Dec 2012
                                • 4411

                                Originally posted by 7.62mm_fmj
                                Ah let's flip Bruen on it's head and sneak in "unlicensed" at the first step. The AG will AG.

                                unlicensed, open carriage of firearms.
                                "unlicensed, open carry" ======> keep (without permission from .gov) and bear (not limited to a particular method) arms
                                soo, I'm gonna say they are wrong. Do they have an issue with reading comprehension... cause it seems pretty clear to me.
                                The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1