That's what I was going to say, even if the kit is bought with intent to build a pistol which is really what AMDs are good for, how can you argue something against the BATFE? Seems like a nazi law to have a rule about restricting ownership of potential substances.
Say:
Bob owns a homebuilt hungarian AKM with legal 16'' barrel and everything is legal. Now if Bob even purchases any AMD65 kit since his legal hungarian rifle can technically accept the AMD's smaller barrel (whether Bob argues it will be used in a pistol or not), it's technically illegal for Bob to even take ownership of an item that can allow illegal SBRs to be formed. Bob is a felon under technical terms of the law.
Now I'm not trying to say anyone that owns a hacksaw in their house and owns any type of gun like a shotgun is a felon for possessing tools to make an SBR but I think everyone kind of understands my point of how strange the constructive intent law is. But it's not affecting me, yet (and hopefully never), so I'll get off my soap box and quit hijacking OP's thread.
Say:
Bob owns a homebuilt hungarian AKM with legal 16'' barrel and everything is legal. Now if Bob even purchases any AMD65 kit since his legal hungarian rifle can technically accept the AMD's smaller barrel (whether Bob argues it will be used in a pistol or not), it's technically illegal for Bob to even take ownership of an item that can allow illegal SBRs to be formed. Bob is a felon under technical terms of the law.
Now I'm not trying to say anyone that owns a hacksaw in their house and owns any type of gun like a shotgun is a felon for possessing tools to make an SBR but I think everyone kind of understands my point of how strange the constructive intent law is. But it's not affecting me, yet (and hopefully never), so I'll get off my soap box and quit hijacking OP's thread.


, btw its pretty fun im playn right now it was leaked, nvrmind beat itl, seemed kinda short but badass





Comment