...

[at_liberty]

If you don't understand why 4227 is to fast a burn rate for a 223/5.56 you need to read more about smokeless powders . This is not to be snarky . It's to make sure you keep all your fingers

That admonition isn't necessary when simply using load data published by a credible source.

[glassparman]

Not using volume, not using volume, not using volume.


I shot the loads, they functioned perfectly, not one single jam

I noticed as I was loading the mag that I should've seated the bullets to 2.206 NOT 2.026 or whatever I posted haha they were inaccurate.

2" at ~80 yards

Sent from my 0PJA2 using Tapatalk

My apologies . . . just wanting you to be safe and your post did talk about 90% full cases. When it comes to reloading, we have to watch out for each other otherwise the libtards will try to ban that as well.