Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Underground Regulation: Non Rosterable Frames

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #61
    hoffmang
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Apr 2006
    • 18448

    Originally posted by Tallship
    Great job, guys. Just out of curiosity, who was the first one to realize that 12025 was not included in 12001?
    The actual first person can't be named but he knows who he is. In a different regulatory environment he didn't want to make it public as we might have faced "fixup" legislation.

    A Calgunner started a thread about pistol framed carbines. That made me look and I discovered the discrepancy anew.

    -Gene
    Gene Hoffman
    Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

    DONATE NOW
    to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
    Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
    I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


    "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

    Comment

    • #62
      383green
      Veteran Member
      • Jan 2006
      • 4328

      He Who Cannot Be Named? I like the sound of that...
      They don't care about your stupid guns! --Mitch
      Mark J. Blair, NF6X

      Comment

      • #63
        7x57
        Calguns Addict
        • Nov 2008
        • 5182

        As long as it wasn't He Who Cannot Even Be Vaguely Alluded To.

        7x57
        sigpic

        What do you need guns for if you are going to send your children, seven hours a day, 180 days a year to government schools? What do you need the guns for at that point?-- R. C. Sproul, Jr. (unconfirmed)

        Originally posted by bulgron
        I know every chance I get I'm going to accuse 7x57 of being a shill for LCAV. Because I can.

        Comment

        • #64
          wash
          Calguns Addict
          • Aug 2007
          • 9011

          If a frame isn't a handgun, does this mean we can get more than one every thirty days?
          sigpic
          Originally posted by oaklander
          Dear Kevin,

          You suck!!! Your are wrong!!! Stop it!!!
          Proud CGF and CGN donor. SAF life member. Former CRPA member. Gpal beta tester (it didn't work). NRA member.

          Comment

          • #65
            hoffmang
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Apr 2006
            • 18448

            Originally posted by wash
            If a frame isn't a handgun, does this mean we can get more than one every thirty days?
            No. A frame is a firearm/handgun for the section of the Penal Code that limits us to one handgun in 30 days per 12001(c).

            -Gene
            Gene Hoffman
            Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

            DONATE NOW
            to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
            Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
            I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


            "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

            Comment

            • #66
              wash
              Calguns Addict
              • Aug 2007
              • 9011

              I guess that means we still need a handgun safety certificate?

              I haven't bought a handgun in a while...
              sigpic
              Originally posted by oaklander
              Dear Kevin,

              You suck!!! Your are wrong!!! Stop it!!!
              Proud CGF and CGN donor. SAF life member. Former CRPA member. Gpal beta tester (it didn't work). NRA member.

              Comment

              • #67
                thedrickel
                Calguns Addict
                • Apr 2006
                • 5578

                C&R + COE FTW!
                I hate people that are full of hate.

                It's not illegal to tip for PPT!

                Comment

                • #68
                  xxdabroxx
                  Veteran Member
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 3392

                  This line in the frames letter really pisses me off, "A pistol must be tested and approved by a DOJ-certified handgun testing laboratory before it can be approved for sale in California. A handgun that is tested and approved is eligible for listing on DOJ's roster of handguns that have been determined 'not unsafe' and approved for sale to the public

                  and thanks Gene, Bill, and all others at CGF!

                  but did you have to use a Taurus pt1911 for the complete pistol and frame? really?

                  and what is Tidewater?
                  Last edited by xxdabroxx; 02-27-2009, 12:58 PM.
                  sigpic
                  NRA EPL Member
                  Visit my blogBullets in the Wash

                  Comment

                  • #69
                    Monte
                    Member
                    CGN Contributor
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 426

                    Originally posted by rkt88edmo
                    Time to start saving my pennies for a Pac Lite upper for the MkII
                    Ooh, good call, but would a serial numbered barreled upper qualify? I thought I read somewhere in one of these threads that the reason a frame didn't qualify as a firearm was because it didn't have the ability fire a projectile (I'm still trying to re-find that bit of info). It might be a bit of a stretch, since you'd have to futz around with it a bit to fire a round, but who knows.

                    Comment

                    • #70
                      Librarian
                      Admin and Poltergeist
                      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 44661

                      Originally posted by xxdabroxx
                      and what is Tidewater?
                      Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. Bradshaw, 14 Cal. 4th 557, 571 (1996)
                      We conclude that these interpretive policies do constitute regulations and therefore are void because they were not adopted in accordance with the APA. Nevertheless, we conclude that the agency properly exercised its enforcement jurisdiction and that the trial court erred in granting a permanent injunction barring enforcement.

                      Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
                      Generically, state agencies must follow the rules to create regulations.
                      ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

                      Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

                      Comment

                      • #71
                        rkt88edmo
                        Reptile&Samurai Moderator
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Dec 2002
                        • 10062

                        Originally posted by Monte
                        Ooh, good call, but would a serial numbered barreled upper qualify? I thought I read somewhere in one of these threads that the reason a frame didn't qualify as a firearm was because it didn't have the ability fire a projectile (I'm still trying to re-find that bit of info). It might be a bit of a stretch, since you'd have to futz around with it a bit to fire a round, but who knows.
                        Good question - but what good is a barrelled upper without a bolt, firing pin, hammer, etc. - it definitely is not quite cleanly as cut since the MkII upper has a barrel and chamber - but still lacks the majority of what would make up a "handgun'.
                        If it was a snake, it would have bit me.
                        Use the goog to search calguns

                        Comment

                        • #72
                          wildhawker
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 14150

                          Originally posted by 7x57
                          As long as it wasn't He Who Cannot Even Be Vaguely Alluded To.

                          7x57
                          THAT is classic!
                          Brandon Combs

                          I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

                          My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.

                          Comment

                          • #73
                            7x57
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 5182

                            Originally posted by wildhawker
                            THAT is classic!
                            I wish it was original with me, but it isn't.

                            7x57
                            sigpic

                            What do you need guns for if you are going to send your children, seven hours a day, 180 days a year to government schools? What do you need the guns for at that point?-- R. C. Sproul, Jr. (unconfirmed)

                            Originally posted by bulgron
                            I know every chance I get I'm going to accuse 7x57 of being a shill for LCAV. Because I can.

                            Comment

                            • #74
                              CHS
                              Moderator Emeritus
                              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                              • Jan 2008
                              • 11338

                              Originally posted by hoffmang
                              A Calgunner started a thread about pistol framed carbines. That made me look and I discovered the discrepancy anew.

                              -Gene
                              That was me
                              Please read the Calguns Wiki
                              Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
                              --Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"

                              Comment

                              • #75
                                CHS
                                Moderator Emeritus
                                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                                • Jan 2008
                                • 11338

                                Originally posted by Monte
                                Ooh, good call, but would a serial numbered barreled upper qualify? I thought I read somewhere in one of these threads that the reason a frame didn't qualify as a firearm was because it didn't have the ability fire a projectile (I'm still trying to re-find that bit of info). It might be a bit of a stretch, since you'd have to futz around with it a bit to fire a round, but who knows.
                                Only a complete assembled handgun has the ability to fire. A pac-lite upper does not, even though it has a chamber.

                                The paclite does not come with a bolt, which also means it has no firing pin. The paclite uses your original bolt. There's also no hammer since that is part of the frame.

                                A paclite is a perfect NeRF example.
                                Please read the Calguns Wiki
                                Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
                                --Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1