Why would LE be exempt from MicroStamping?

[Click Boom]

the LE unions wont support any gun control if LE isn't exempt. if anything they should have it in the event of an on duty shooting investigators will be able to tell who fired what and how many rounds.

They don't want extra supervision, nobody does.

[chris]

They don't want extra supervision, nobody does.

of course not. serfs like us are not to be trusted and are second class to the elitists of this state.

[Picturepro]

You remember how well the law with Texting and holding a cell phone worked....
"Deputy was texting before he hit, killed cycling Napster executive"

http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-napster-executive-death-20140807-story.html

[StuckInTheP.R.O.Ca]

You remember how well the law with Texting and holding a cell phone worked....
"Deputy was texting before he hit, killed cycling Napster executive"
http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-n...807-story.html

This incident and that the Deputy got off scott free still ticks me off.

[cmichini]

But why would LE not support it? Would make life easyer.

LE is concerned about being above the law, not complying with it.

Should be obvious if you've been paying attention.

[ElvenSoul]

Ban da gov't!

[Divernhunter]

Simple answer: Because they are special and better than the rest of us. A whole different set of standards and rules for them.

That is what it really is.

[RR.44]

They are the ones who need it most

[Mosin1944]

What's preventing a gangsta from picking up my brass after I shoot and dropping them at the scene of his crime, implicating me?

As one poster said above, this is not about guns. It's about control.

And what good is this law if a revolver is used? Not everyone has semi-autos.

[Marquand]

In addition to the facts listed above, law enforcement officials already know that microstamping doesn't work even if some firearms manufacturer on planet Earth was using it.

[TrailerparkTrash]

if anything they should have it in the event of an on duty shooting investigators will be able to tell who fired what and how many rounds.

That technology already exists WITHOUT micro stamping and is currently used routinely around the nation. You didn't know that????

Probably for the same reasons we don't support it.

I don't know any "line" officers that support these crappy laws, including "micro stamping." Please don't lump the entire "line-swine" officer(s) with police "administrators" (Chiefs & Sheriffis). 99% of Police administrators are nothing but politicians with a badge, whether appointed or elected to the position.

Simple answer: Because they are special and better than the rest of us. A whole different set of standards and rules for them.

That is what it really is.

Whenever I read slams like that, it leads me to question whether it's just another person that either couldn't or would never pass backgrounds during the application process to begin with. Subsequently the person then despises the profession he/she once tried to be.

Don't lump all cops into the "bad" category. It's just ignorant.

[QXSOUP]

That technology already exists WITHOUT micro stamping and is currently used routinely around the nation. You didn't know that????


I don't know any "line" officers that support these crappy laws, including "micro stamping." Please don't lump the entire "line-swine" officer(s) with police "administrators" (Chiefs & Sheriffis). 99% of Police administrators are nothing but politicians with a badge, whether appointed or elected to the position.


Whenever I read slams like that, it leads me to question whether it's just another person that either couldn't or would never pass backgrounds during the application process to begin with. Subsequently the person then despises the profession he/she once tried to be.

Don't lump all cops into the "bad" category. It's just ignorant.

...And there in lies the problem. The "line" officers need to come put publicly and state that they DO NOT agree with what their supervisors/admins are doing. But we all know that will never happen... you know risk the golden parachute retirement and all... "Line" officers are the face of the government for a great number of people. What the government does/says comes directly from the mouth of there "line" officers. YOU as a normal beat cop need to stand up and STOP the BS that is coming from your higher ups. the "just following orders" defense never has really worked real well.

Most cops are in the "bad category" as you say because of this. If you disagree with a law and you know that it directly conflicts with the Constitution, then speak up and say something. The bad apples are NOT going to leave until the good guys separate themselves.

[kygen]

Whenever I read slams like that, it leads me to question whether it's just another person that either couldn't or would never pass backgrounds during the application process to begin with. Subsequently the person then despises the profession he/she once tried to be.

Don't lump all cops into the "bad" category. It's just ignorant.

I'm sure I wouldn't have a problem with the background checks, but it would take me a bit to bulk up for the physical exams

[Untamed1972]

Because none of these laws actually have anything to do with safety or reduction of crime. They are simply meant to be incremental infringements to achieve a defacto gun ban.

[Sizzlechest]

Because they know it's does not work. I think micro stamping will go away. I wish someone would have been able to buy the patent and get rid of it.