Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Old technology argument

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #61
    Noonanda
    Veteran Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 3404

    Originally posted by Steve_In_29
    You apparently never served in the military either since the M2 isn't just a vehicle mounted system. Grunts hump those and the ammo to feed them into some pretty rugged terrain. The same CAN'T be said for the mini-gun, the batteries needed to power it and enough ammo to feed it.

    In the strange juxtaposition of low and high tech in the world of infantry combat, the M2 is a much better fit, despite it's supposed "obsolescence".
    Very important point here Steve. Unless you dedicate a whole platoon to carry ammo for the Minigun it will run out of ammo in no time quick. Plus unlike what people saw in "Predator" a minigun (even a 7.62 or 5.56 version) isnt a man portable weapon system due to the batteries and the massive amounts of ammo required to feed even one gun.. But on the other hand I can take a Weapons Plt and have them hump 4-5 M-2's with tripods and enough ammo to cause some severe hate and discontent up to the top of a hill and they will own a 3-4 kilometer radius as long as the ammo holds out. It may be heavy, but it is still man portable, unlike a Gau-19.
    "You see in this world theres two kinds of people my friend. Those with loaded guns, and those who dig... You Dig" Blondie from TGBU

    Comment

    • #62
      EchoFourTango
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 636

      I like my 1911 and my p99 compact. Both are fun for me to shoot. My at-15 and m1a are the same way
      sigpic

      Comment

      • #63
        Bobby Ricigliano
        Mit Gott und Mauser
        CGN Contributor
        • Feb 2011
        • 17439

        I would just as likely bug out with my trusty SKS and a bandolier full of stripper clips as I would anything else. I think it is a shill argument. All technological advances aside, the fundamental key is the rifleman, not the rifle.
        Last edited by Bobby Ricigliano; 09-28-2014, 10:03 PM.

        Comment

        • #64
          cindynles
          Veteran Member
          • Dec 2008
          • 2806

          Originally posted by Bobby Ricigliano
          I would just as likely bug out with my trusty SKS and a bandolier full of stripper clips as I would anything else. I think it is a shill argument. All technological advances aside, the fundamental key is the rifleman, not the rifle.
          At least you won't have to worry about losing the bayonet .
          "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." B.Franklin,1759

          Comment

          • #65
            FourTenJaeger
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Oct 2010
            • 11540

            You always need to have the latest most expensive toy to shoot paper at the range.

            The AK47 is clearly garbage too, since the HK416 exists.
            Saturday Night Special Expert
            CGTS Captain and Founder
            Firearms Collector

            Comment

            • #66
              JDay
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Nov 2008
              • 19393

              Originally posted by jaymz
              Bushing wrenches only make dis-assembly easier. I can strip all of my 1911's without one.
              Same here. I've never needed tools to field strip a 1911.

              Sent from my LG G3
              Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace. -- James Madison

              The Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms. -- Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 86-87 (Pearce and Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1