Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firearms Insurance claims?
Collapse
X
-
sigpic
Originally posted by dca965CA CCW 2013 | Applied in person 11/4 | App approved 12/10 | Interview 12/17 | Denial (GC) Ltr. 1/14 | AZ CCW 2014 | Applied via mail 03/20 | Entered by DPS 05/02 | Approved 5/10 | Received 5/16 | OR CHL 2014 | Applied in person 04/17 | Approved 4/30 | Received 5/9 | WA CPL 2014 | Applied in person 04/18 | Approved 6/9 | Received 6/12 | NV CFP 2014 | Applied 09/25 | Received 1/15 | UT CFP 2015 | Applied 11/26 | Received 1/16 -
-
-
I too read the posts by Quarterboregunner... an important read by one who has "Been there..Done that"....
I had assumed the LGS policy was specifically structured for this sort of deal...
I have followed that case... watched a bit of the trial and read a lot....
Stand your ground was not envoked nor needed... he, (GZ), couldn't retreat as he was on his back on the ground getting his head bashed against concrete...
"Stand your Ground" was simply a political football tossed about with no relevance to the case....
California has no "Duty to Retreat" from a criminal standpoint...The founding fathers did a wonderful thing when they included the second amendment to the constitution...
Yes... and this! http://www.constitution.org/2ll/2ndschol/87senrpt.pdf
Good Guys with Guns HEREComment
-
I too read the posts by Quarterboregunner... an important read by one who has "Been there..Done that"....
I had assumed the LGS policy was specifically structured for this sort of deal...
I have followed that case... watched a bit of the trial and read a lot....
Stand your ground was not envoked nor needed... he, (GZ), couldn't retreat as he was on his back on the ground getting his head bashed against concrete...
"Stand your Ground" was simply a political football tossed about with no relevance to the case....
California has no "Duty to Retreat" from a criminal standpoint...
Mmm, stand your ground didn't come up because it does not apply to criminal complaints. Nothing to do with politics.
Stand your ground also has nothing to do with people pinned on their backs incapable of retreating. ( you don't really need a law for situations like that do you?)
The ridiculous complaints were simple.
GZ had a gun. O my!
GZ would never have pursued that poor little child unless GZ had a big bad gun AND stand your ground on his side.
So back to your OP. Did you really think folks that shot someone and got sued, would post details here?Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,865,620
Posts: 25,132,688
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 3,845
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 7948 users online. 118 members and 7830 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment