Think about it.
Its a catch 22, they came to you asking why someone else was in control of a firearm that was in your name. You claim that you sold it and offered proof that you did.
Now on the flip side since they said you own it you want to try to claim it.
You can not have it both ways and eat your cake too. If you claim it then you are saying you are the rightful owner so you are back to square one about why it was out of your possession.
Its a catch 22, they came to you asking why someone else was in control of a firearm that was in your name. You claim that you sold it and offered proof that you did.
Now on the flip side since they said you own it you want to try to claim it.
You can not have it both ways and eat your cake too. If you claim it then you are saying you are the rightful owner so you are back to square one about why it was out of your possession.
Comment