Tweet
I like the idea of a "gunsmithing party"... Is the ATF really taking the stance that if I walk out of my LGS with a newly purchased lower and borrow a screwdriver to install the LPK, that a crime has been commited? If I have a gunsmith populate my lower with the LPK, are they required to pay an excise tax?
DOJ/ATF/XYZ have a history of changing there minds, leaving the public to guess where the line was moved to. I like to know where the line is. It is pretty clearly defined as to what can and cannot be done to an 80% receiver, or as ATF would rather describe it: a hunk of material that has been partially formed and is one step away from being deemed a newly manufactured firearm.
While it is is more difficult for the community, what would be illegal about a group of people with 100% "firearms/receivers" from sharing tools? Has this been specifically deemed a no-no or is this just FUD talking?
DOJ/ATF/XYZ have a history of changing there minds, leaving the public to guess where the line was moved to. I like to know where the line is. It is pretty clearly defined as to what can and cannot be done to an 80% receiver, or as ATF would rather describe it: a hunk of material that has been partially formed and is one step away from being deemed a newly manufactured firearm.
While it is is more difficult for the community, what would be illegal about a group of people with 100% "firearms/receivers" from sharing tools? Has this been specifically deemed a no-no or is this just FUD talking?
Comment