Is anyone familiar with the magnet button laws.
Someone told me that they had a magnet on the magazine release of their AR15, and law enforcement told him that having the magnet on the button, changes the magazine from a 'non-detachable' to a 'detachable' type, and that the gun know having a detachable magazine is considered an assault weapon. He also went as far as to claim that the simple addition of the magnet on the button, could carry 'manufacturing' charges.
This sounds scarey and my research so far has not found a difinitive penal code verbiage that addresses the magnets. It appears that if the magnet can be considered a 'tool' then the gun would then meet Calif complient standards and be legal. It all seems to hinge on the maget and weather it meets the definition of a 'tool'.
The DOJ said that they have not taken a difinitive stance on this issue.
Does anyone have experience with this situation, and does anyone know someone that was charged under these conditions but had them dropped by the DA?
Someone told me that they had a magnet on the magazine release of their AR15, and law enforcement told him that having the magnet on the button, changes the magazine from a 'non-detachable' to a 'detachable' type, and that the gun know having a detachable magazine is considered an assault weapon. He also went as far as to claim that the simple addition of the magnet on the button, could carry 'manufacturing' charges.
This sounds scarey and my research so far has not found a difinitive penal code verbiage that addresses the magnets. It appears that if the magnet can be considered a 'tool' then the gun would then meet Calif complient standards and be legal. It all seems to hinge on the maget and weather it meets the definition of a 'tool'.
The DOJ said that they have not taken a difinitive stance on this issue.
Does anyone have experience with this situation, and does anyone know someone that was charged under these conditions but had them dropped by the DA?

Comment