I fully understand why sellers won't sell anything to CA. Too much hastle along with the possibilty of CA FFLs refusing to accept something due to FUD.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
who is responsible to make sure the online purchased gun is California compliant?
Collapse
X
-
-
Below are seller provided information of the list:
Action: SINGLE/DOUBLE
Barrel Length: 4.9
Brand: Beretta
Capacity: 10
Rim Fire: Centerfire
Distinguishing Factor: false
Frame Finish: Black Bruniton
Frame Material: ALUMINUM ALLOY
Frame Size: Full
General Finish: BLUE/BRUNITON (MATTE BLACK)
Grip Material: Synthetic
Part Number: J92M9A0
Product Name: Beretta Commercial M9
Safety: Slide Mounted Manual/Decocker
Series: Commercial
Front Sights: 3-Dot
General Sights: 3 DOT FIXED SIGHTS/M9 DOT AND POST
Slide Finish: Black Bruniton
Slide Material: Stainless Steel
Stock Material: Black Plastic Grips
Total Height: 5.4
Total Length: 8.5
UPC: 082442816838Comment
-
100% the Buyer. We ship back immediately about one in eight guns shipped to us for non-compliance.Best Collateral Pawn in SSF, we are doing PPTs by appointment. Call 650 589 4433, ask for Rowland or RonComment
-
But if you plan on using the gun shop simply as FFL for receiving gun you buy online and DROS....then it is YOUR responsibility to verify it is CA approved and accept financial loss if gun can't be DROS'ed to you.
Regardless of any advice you may get here, you are ultimately responsible by law for any guns you own.Comment
-
Buyer; because there is NO reason that the buyer can't simply check the Roster against Model and SKU numbers. It's all there, inside of about 3 clicks away from here.
This is all so relevant now, because so many Newbs are carelessly buying their first gun, sure to be making mistakes, and out-of-state sellers are not going to have the Roster compliance in their contextual care.
Hence why so many dealers are posting anecdotes of send-backs on their websites along with explanations as to how/what buyers of online guns hoping to send it to their FFL need to do to be sure it's OK in CA.-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
Buyer; because there is NO reason that the buyer can't simply check the Roster against Model and SKU numbers. It's all there, inside of about 3 clicks away from here.
This is all so relevant now, because so many Newbs are carelessly buying their first gun, sure to be making mistakes, and out-of-state sellers are not going to have the Roster compliance in their contextual care.
Hence why so many dealers are posting anecdotes of send-backs on their websites along with explanations as to how/what buyers of online guns hoping to send it to their FFL need to do to be sure it's OK in CA.Comment
-
The buyer, besides CA, there are 49 other states, your problem is not their problem and now you know why a lot of sellers refuse to ship to CA.www.culinagrips.com
"custom grips for shooters by shooters"Comment
-
-Financially responsible for any issues- the buyer 100% responsible
-Legally responsible to confirm it is on roster before proceeding with the dros - the receiving ffl 100% responsible
-seller has no responsibility in the matter as long as they haven't broken california law. (AW laws or sending to a non ffl) no crime in sending a non AW off roster handgun to a california ffl.
Bottom line is it costs sellers and receiving ffls money/time to right your wrong. Life lesson on your dime as the buyer.Last edited by pythonfan; 01-24-2021, 1:29 PM.Comment
-
I guess the difficulty part for many people is that the roster does not give all SKU numbers. Many of them, like the one of the above listed Beretta M9, are only listed on the roster by names. Sellers listed gun names may not use exact words as the roster uses, which may make those guns look similar but not 100% sure if they are the same. Like to know how people judge if a gun is the one on the list when there is no SKU number on the roster.
If you need more assurance, call Barretta USA customer service.Comment
-
I guess the difficulty part for many people is that the roster does not give all SKU numbers. Many of them, like the one of the above listed Beretta M9, are only listed on the roster by names. Sellers listed gun names may not use exact words as the roster uses, which may make those guns look similar but not 100% sure if they are the same. Like to know how people judge if a gun is the one on the list when there is no SKU number on the roster.
That is, the manufacturer will usually have one MPN/SKU that comes with 10-Round Magazines only (i.e., for California and similar Anti-2nd Amendment States), and another version that comes with High-Capacity Magazines, in this case, 15-rounders. Narrow it down to those 10-round mag MPN/SKU first, and of those determine which one is on the Roster.
In this very simple case, most wholesalers identify which Beretta MPN is the correct match for CA and note it comes only with 10-round magazines. In one single click Google search, I found the following correct one for CA from several wholesalers (prominently, RifleGear and Sportsman's Warehouse).
Beretta 92 M9 - (For CA) - MPN: J92M9A0 // SKU: BER-J92M9A0
But I think you have a bigger hurdle on your hands; finding one in stock.-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
Buyer and FFL.
I ran into this last month. Bought a new pistol from Buds that was on their California approved list. My mistake was I didn't go to the roster and double check. When I got to my FFL to DROS they couldn't find it on the roster. Buds response was " It's buyers responsibility to confirm it is legal in California"Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,854,085
Posts: 24,991,273
Members: 353,086
Active Members: 6,427
Welcome to our newest member, kylejimenez932.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 9524 users online. 35 members and 9489 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment