Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

if you could implement "common sense" gun laws

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #91
    Triple765
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2018
    • 691

    What happens when the background check system goes down? What if it pulls up 'false positive'? You're denied your rights, right? It also doesn't apply to stolen, borrowed nor manufactured( 80%'ers or other creative options) firearms either.
    sigpic

    Comment

    • #92
      Mr. Blue
      Veteran Member
      • Dec 2019
      • 2520

      Originally posted by DrjonesUSA
      I'd disallow democrat voters & registered dems from purchasing guns.

      If you really agree with the democrat party's platform, you shouldn't want to own a gun, and you also shouldn't be allowed to.

      It's for your own good.

      Besides; we all know that having a gun in the home merely increases YOUR risk of death; you'll hurt yourself or shoot another family member by accident with it. Or you'll get caught up in a heated argument, pull out your gun & shoot them.

      We all know that. It's common sense!

      Democrats = no guns.

      It's for your own good.
      +1 here.
      https://youtube.com/c/GatCat

      Comment

      • #93
        five.five-six
        CGN Contributor
        • May 2006
        • 34925

        Originally posted by alexinc
        if you could implement "common sense" gun laws
        A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

        What do you think?

        Comment

        • #94
          POLICESTATE
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Apr 2009
          • 18185

          Originally posted by alexinc
          I am sure this has been discussed a million times. Just because you are a car enthusiast, doesn't mean you wouldn't support laws and regulations that keep the roads safe and minimise avoidable accidents, etc. it's where non drivers start spouting idiotic laws where problems start to occur.

          So if YOU could implement reasonable "common sense" gun laws, what would they be?
          NONE
          -POLICESTATE,
          In the name of the State, and of the School, and of the Infallible Science


          sigpic


          Government Official Lies
          . F r e e d o m . D i e s .

          Comment

          • #95
            AGGRO
            Veteran Member
            • Oct 2009
            • 2793

            Originally posted by sonofeugene
            So, the one thing that still bugs me is the background check. How do we prevent those who are criminals from obtaining guns if we do away with that?
            You can't even with it.
            Straw purchase
            parking lot purchase

            Don't think for a minute that does more than slow down a criminal.


            Ever hear of an 80%

            Comment

            • #96
              TheReluctantCraftstronaut
              Member
              • Aug 2017
              • 430

              Originally posted by alexinc
              I am sure this has been discussed a million times. Just because you are a car enthusiast, doesn't mean you wouldn't support laws and regulations that keep the roads safe and minimise avoidable accidents, etc. it's where non drivers start spouting idiotic laws where problems start to occur.

              So if YOU could implement reasonable "common sense" gun laws, what would they be?
              - Felony offense, loss of pension, and mandatory prison sentence for all gov't employees legislating, upholding, or enforcing restrictions on constitutional rights.

              - Repeal the NFA.

              - National open and conceal carry

              - Mandatory marksmanship training for all able-bodied men and women.

              - Illegal for any non-military gov't agency to be equipped with weapons beyond that which citizens can have.

              - Now to back-peddle a bit, I do believe that limitations on 2A were never intended and there's historical evidence of that. However, I don't want my neighbors buying SAMS, nukes, etc. I still wrestle with this, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't lean towards capping the 2A somewhere around weapons that could be carried and used by infantrymen. Doesn't NEED to be used by military, just needs to be something that COULD be used, even if it would be silly to bring an over/under into combat, it's theoretically possible, so it counts. I would include grenades, belt fed MGs, and RPGs as items protected by 2A as well.

              I've come to believe that dangerous liberty is worth the inherent risks, but I'm still not sure how much risk we should tolerate with modern weapons. Is it logical to allow private ownership of tanks, heavy artillery, etc? I'm not sure.

              Comment

              • #97
                nedro
                Veteran Member
                • Nov 2014
                • 4130

                WOW! It's like Bambi taking his first steps, looking around, trying to take in all the new and wonderous things he's seeing wile trying to balance himself on 4 wobbly stilts.

                What a mess!

                Comment

                • #98
                  Kokopelli
                  Veteran Member
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 3444

                  Originally posted by alexinc
                  I am sure this has been discussed a million times. Just because you are a car enthusiast, doesn't mean you wouldn't support laws and regulations that keep the roads safe and minimise avoidable accidents, etc. it's where non drivers start spouting idiotic laws where problems start to occur.

                  So if YOU could implement reasonable "common sense" gun laws, what would they be?
                  Reasonable?

                  If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth. - Ronald Reagan

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1