Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

July 1st question

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Armed-Citizen
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 552

    July 1st question

    Is there a final word yet on max ammo per month law?

    // See the sticky in the CA laws forum -= http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s....php?t=1413768
    //
    // Librarian
    Last edited by Librarian; 06-14-2019, 9:16 PM.
  • #2
    Quiet
    retired Goon
    • Mar 2007
    • 30242

    Originally posted by Armed-Citizen
    Is there a final word yet on max ammo per month law?
    The amount of ammunition a person can legally buy or sell does not change after 06-30-19.

    Currently...
    Selling = limited to 500 rounds per 30 days, unless licensed by CA DOJ as an ammunition vendor.
    Buying = no limit.
    sigpic

    "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

    Comment

    • #3
      Armed-Citizen
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 552

      So buying a 1000 now and 1000july 1st,
      Not really An difference, except background check and fees and less retailers to choose from?

      Comment

      • #4
        The Gleam
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Feb 2011
        • 13210

        Originally posted by Armed-Citizen
        So buying a 1000 now and 1000july 1st,
        Not really An difference, except background check and fees and less retailers to choose from?
        There is plenty more than that... and plenty of threads about it these past 2.5 years since Prop 63 was pitched, calls to vote against it, then it was voted for, and the numerous calls to fight it, the petition drive and its subsequent failure due to apathetic gun owners not paying attention who did not sign (or refused to sign) and many, many recent threads talking about all those extra details.
        -----------------------------------------------
        Originally posted by Librarian
        What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

        If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

        Comment

        • #5
          Armed-Citizen
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2013
          • 552

          Thanks for the response

          Comment

          • #6
            Quiet
            retired Goon
            • Mar 2007
            • 30242

            Originally posted by Armed-Citizen
            So buying a 1000 now and 1000july 1st,
            Not really An difference, except background check and fees and less retailers to choose from?
            Ammo DROS also reports the brand, type, and amount of ammunition being transferred. [PC 30352(a)(3)]


            In regards to the background check...
            The standard and COE checks are suppose to be "instant" (less than 1 hour) checks, but can take up to 30 days.
            The ammo with firearm check can take up to 10 days.
            The basic check can take up to 30 days.
            Last edited by Quiet; 06-14-2019, 12:51 AM.
            sigpic

            "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

            Comment

            • #7
              el tardo
              Banned
              • Sep 2012
              • 1094

              Or skip all this by being exempt and possessing a COE and 003FFL And have it delivered to your door

              Comment

              • #8
                Armed-Citizen
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2013
                • 552

                Prop 63 won't affect that?

                Comment

                • #9
                  faterikcartman
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 1404

                  Originally posted by Quiet
                  Ammo DROS also reports the brand, type, and amount of ammunition being transferred.
                  Amount.

                  A good portion of the state, elected representatives, and all MSM reporters, already view 1,000 rounds as a stock pile no normal person would ever need. Only a gun nut or terrorist hell bent on mayhem.

                  If you were worried about your guns being on some list in Sacramento, don't think you're not going to be eventually of note if you buy ammo in any great quantity.

                  Save your breath explaining about competing, training, etc., etc. It will fall on deaf ears.

                  Creeping incrementalism. Which I mention because there will inevitably be those who say "relax, it's no big deal..., stop being paranoid". I'm not ancient. But I'm old enough to see how things progress. Inch by inch. Year after year. It's a long game. And if you're not thinking about where things will be in a decade or two you're liable to miss the individual building blocks that shape the future.

                  Obviously Quiet, though I quoted you, I'm not directing this to you personally.
                  I am not your lawyer. I am not giving you or anyone else who reads my posts legal advice. I am making off-the-cuff comments that may or may not be accurate and are personal, not professional, opinion. If you think you need a lawyer please retain a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction. Your local bar association may be able to help if you need a referral.

                  Two Weeks!: http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/a...p/t-59936.html

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    mwr
                    Member
                    • Aug 2013
                    • 325

                    "Creeping incrementalism" great description, or "inch by inch is cinch, yard by yard is hard" the left's have figured that it is far easier to strip our rights away one small piece at a time, hopeful that we will get tired of the fight and give up totally.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      elk hunter
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2014
                      • 2122

                      It would be interesting to find out what triggers a "no" sale when you apply for the sale and do a background check. Is there a no sale? and what would the reasons be for it? Is there a remedy for a false no sale? or will you be flagged as a something?

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Whiskey_Tango
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2014
                        • 1588

                        What is the deal with cross referencing your registered firearms chamberings with your ammo purchase?

                        They just talked about it on KCRA. Is that actually a thing or just FUD?

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          champu
                          CGN Contributor
                          • Nov 2013
                          • 1981

                          Originally posted by Whiskey_Tango
                          What is the deal with cross referencing your registered firearms chamberings with your ammo purchase?

                          They just talked about it on KCRA. Is that actually a thing or just FUD?

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            still919
                            Member
                            • Nov 2015
                            • 458

                            Originally posted by mwr
                            "Creeping incrementalism" great description, or "inch by inch is cinch, yard by yard is hard" the left's have figured that it is far easier to strip our rights away one small piece at a time, hopeful that we will get tired of the fight and give up totally.
                            Well said. And, it's working. They stopped swinging for the fences, and are playing small ball.

                            I'm still surprised at the "So, what does July 01, 2019 really mean"....on this forum of all places. I'm not picking on anyone, but it goes to show the strategy is working.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Rivers
                              Senior Member
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 1630

                              My sense on the way this gets turned around is that a major meltdown has to happen in CA. By that I mean the voters need to get disgusted enough by various issues in CA, like crime, homelessness, mental health, immigration, taxes, cost of living, public education, CA's pension crisis, housing prices, etc. that they rethink their votes. When the legislature shifts to becoming more responsible (conservative), then we can work on restoring some normalcy with gun-related laws.

                              When will this happen? If Trump gets re-elected in 2020, that might slightly speed things up. If a D gets the White House, kiss this off for a generation, and if for a generation, forever. Only a civil war would change it then.
                              NRA Certified Instructor: Basic Pistol Shooting

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1