A long time ago I started making a list of things I learned while reading Calguns, and it just kept growing. I have taken great care to ensure that there is no extrapolation, exaggeration, fabrication, intentional misreading, or outright distortion in this list, because that would be wrong. However, I want to stress the level of my commitment to accuracy and fairness by stating up front that I'll be happy to retract the list if every single item is shown to have no basis in fact whatsoever. :-)
Naturally the mods should make this a sticky so newbies can get up to speed as rapidly as possible. :-)
The Great Big List Of Things I Learned From Reading Calguns (part 1)
7x57
Naturally the mods should make this a sticky so newbies can get up to speed as rapidly as possible. :-)
The Great Big List Of Things I Learned From Reading Calguns (part 1)
- I need guns. Lots of guns.
- Calguns is addictive.
- Buy more guns.
- My work is unimportant. I must read calguns on company time or I'll miss something time-critical, such as a report on a lawsuit that doesn't personally affect me and that has been in court for six years and counting so far.
- In fact, Calguns is more addictive than crack cocaine, methadone, and nicotine.
- Everyone needs a black rifle. Several. Buy
three(changed after the election) thirty-seven now.
- Buy more guns. But also read Calguns instead of doing the work that would earn me the money to buy more guns.
- The most common danger faced by ordinary Californians is Zombie attack. The most probable natural disaster is a Zombie Apocalypse.
- Calgunners are divided over the ideal Zombie-killing weapon: some maximize the kinetic energy of each round and recommend battle rifles such as M1s, M14s, and FALs, other maximize rate of fire and prefer carbines such as ARs and AKs. A few maximize number of projectiles per shot and prefer shotguns. A few maximize handiness and minimize recoil and prefer very light cartridges such as the M1 carbine. The only real consensus is for semi-autos; however, many keep manual action repeaters as backup for the long fight in the ruins of civilization when keeping an autoloader clean, lubed, and operational is increasingly difficult.
- Which type of firearm (battle rifle, carbine, shotgun) is ideal depends on the type of zombies encountered. Many study The Zombie Survival Guide and World War Z, but others prefer different sources such as film. Those who expect zombies that can only be stopped by head shots will generally opt for carbine rounds, large magazine capacities, and high rates of fire. Those anticipating zombies that must be destroyed by wholesale damage gravitate toward shotguns and battle rifles.
- The only way to be prepared for whatever type of zombies I encounter is to have several specimens of all four types close at hand at all times, at least loaded and ready beside my chair if my lap isn't big enough to cradle them while I
workread Calguns.
- It's totally normal to cradle one or more guns in my lap while reading Calguns.
- If those guns are especially lonely or suffering from the existential angst that only an inanimate object can suffer, cuddling is the only cure. Guns just want to be loved.
- Guns are like tribbles--they give us love and reproduce unendingly.
- All we are sayin' is "give guns a chance."
- In a legal environment in which legal force is only justified for a reasonable fear of immediate danger, the ideal self-defense round is one with an effective range exceeding 1000 meters.
- The best rifle for this round is one that only survived a decade as the US issue rifle and breaks expensive parts if fed anything but the original military loading.
- Though a good alternative is one with the same fragile operating rod and a fixed magazine. The best way to take down a zombie is with a little living history! Historical romanticism is the most effective weapon of all.
- Speaking of that rifle, the little "ping" of an ejected en-bloc clip is louder in the ears of scared, pumped-up enemy soldiers a hundred meters away than the muzzle blast of their own weapons. Over the sound of artillery and batlefield chaos. I read it on a gun board, it must be true!
- In a legal environment where no lethal force is justified unless almost any level is justified, and where unlike the military you will probably only fire one or two shots at point-blank range that must stop your attacker, the ideal self-defense round is a small-caliber carbine round that many in the military have found inadequate in fully automatic weapons.
- The most reliable rifle for this round is one that directs dirty combustion products as far as possible into the gun's overly delicate and precise mechanism. Direct impingement was the best way to save a couple of bucks a rifle in order to win lowest-builder military contracts and squeeze out a fraction of a minute more of accuracy, and it's the best way to save my life too!
- In a legal environment where I must expect to be assaulted a second time in court, and DA's and juries alike judge weapons and their users based on appearance, movies, and prejudice, the ideal self-defense round is one universally associated with communists, third-world dictatorships, and terrorists. As a bonus, while ammo is cheap it is all FMJ.
- The ideal rifle for this round is one with all the accuracy inherent in a design slightly less sophisticated than stone knives and bearskins; accuracy is a sensible tradeoff for the fabled reliability since my rifle will typically be uncleaned and covered in mud, insects, and filth when confronting looters in my own home.
- The jury will understand any unintended casualties coming from the indifferent accuracy, or appearing to come from the indifferent accuracy. They'd never assume I was recklessly spraying bullets all over all creation, in spite of the fact that this is the weapon most associated in the public mind with "spray and pray" tactics.
- They'd never believe I was spraying bullets just because the prosecutor led the jury to believe it is an automatic carbine like the identical-looking ones they see on TV.
- Nor will it be a problem that this rifle is instantly recognizable even to
- the layman, and the most iconically evil rifle ever created as far as any jury is concerned.
- An even more ideal rifle would be one designed for those not educated enough to use the above rifle, with all the above advantages plus a fixed magazine! But hey, my life is worth saving a few hundred bucks.
- Shooting the absolute ideal SHTF round is worth it even if I am the only person on the West coast who possesses brass for it. I'll never lose brass in a firefight anyway.
- The most advanced hollow-point expanding ammo is insufficient to stop an attacker.
- But never the less, "they all fall to hardball." It's a good idea to tie my hands with inferior "humane" ammo even though I personally am not a signatory to the Geneva convention (let alone the Hague convention that--unlike the Geneva convention--actually does address acceptable military munitions, but no one remembers that). After all, professional users not tied to the Hague prohibitions such as the police rely on non-expanding ammo to stop killers and PCP addicts. Right? Don't they?
- The terminal ballistics of modern hollowpoint 9mm bullets are utterly inadequate, as proven by the military's experience with hardball more than half a century ago.
- The terminal ballistics of modern hollowpoint .45 ACP bullets are inferior to 9mm, as proven by comparing one-shot stopping data for 9mm hollowpoints to .45 hardball.
- .22 rimfire is also great for self-defense. Anyone who says it is a bad stopping round is just ignoring all the data that indicates the great lethality of rimfire ammo. Stopping probability and kill probability are exactly proportional, right? Right? Uh, guys, right?
- After zombies, the next most likely threat is a cell of Al-Qaida terrorists invading my private home.
- Or perhaps Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi invading my private home.
- Either way, I need more guns.
- All these guns, and I can't buy ammo? I need more ammo!
- Doesn't everyone have a loaded weapon cached in every room in their house?
- Juries are unlikely to buy my story about justifiable homicide with an ordinary handgun, but nevertheless will be impressed by my restraint and judgement if I hack an intruder to pieces with one of the thirteen fantasy-shaped swords that I should keep on my walls for just such an emergency. Guards shaped like dragon wings and grips shaped like naked women will no doubt greatly impress the jury that I am a righteous and upstanding member of the community.
- As will t-shirts with a headshot smiley-face. If arrested I'll wear one every day to my trial!
- If I am forced to defend myself with lethal force, the best way to convince the jury that it was a righteous shoot is to put a gun or knife in the perp's hand and otherwise falsify evidence at the scene. Police never use advanced forensics.
- Juries are never hostile to someone caught lying anyway, so what is the harm in trying?
- Similarly, if I am forced to commit justifiable homicide in my yard I should drag the body into my house. Not even the most painstaking analysis would notice the kind of obvious, probably bloody drag marks this would inevitably produce!
- Birdshot penetrates enough.
- Slugs don't penetrate too much.
- Since statistically I'll only get one or two shots, it's sane to craft complex shotgun load-outs with the lowest-powered loadings first in the magazine (hat tip to rabagley, who is a pretty good sport).
7x57


Comment