Taran Tactical

[holt7153]

[cire raeb]

Taran Tactical

She is an airhead! Taran is using her as eye candy to bring in more business.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[dwalker]

She is a gun bunny, TTI is somewhat infamous for having them around. They have cut all ties with her (supposedly) and she will be easily replaced with another gun bunny.

Here is the gun bunny with an actual shooter, Brian The Legend Nelson at TTI..

[tonyxcom]

You don't think the aniti's go after particular brands? wasn't there a colt that was specifically banned by name.

now when an anti gets a hold of this add and puts their BS spin on things, you don't think it would be a bad caption "Suzy McDumbPants here shown in her Terran tactical and Geissele gear at the largest firearm show in the world was so brave in standing her ground on her firearm opinion. Standing up to the NRA's views on who should have a semi-auto death machine"

I think it would be a positive to have a large firearm company throw their weight around to make sure that she has a bad stigma with her name in the industry?

You still aren't getting it.

Geissele passes out those badge holders at SHOT to anyone who wants one. They didn't give it to her because of an endorsement (even if one exists with Taran) so there is no reason for them to make a statement because she doesn't represent Geissele. At least half the people at Shot were wearing those badge holders. Of all the posts on forums and facebook I have read on this subject, you are the only one who thinks Geissele needs to do/say something here.

[SamsDX]

You still aren't getting it.

Geissele passes out those badge holders at SHOT to anyone who wants one. They didn't give it to her because of an endorsement (even if one exists with Taran) so there is no reason for them to make a statement because she doesn't represent Geissele. At least half the people at Shot were wearing those badge holders. Of all the posts on forums and facebook I have read on this subject, you are the only one who thinks Geissele needs to do/say something here.

There is nobody in the world who would assume that there is some affiliation with or endorsement the company that produces something I'm wearing. Well, maybe, except one - 89LT1. It's not about the emblems displayed within that picture - it's about the fact that Rochelle was, indeed, sponsored by Taran Tactical. Nothing more, nothing less. There's no reason for Geissele to issue any statement, because Rochelle had nothing to do with them. She happens to be wearing something with the company's logo featured on it.

By his logic, the company that made the pants she's wearing should make a statement. So should the company that made those bracelets. Hell, why not throw in the company that made the shooting glasses she's wearing in that video? While we're at it, Jon Bernthal and even Netflix, who produced and streamed the Punisher show should make a statement, because she's in a picture with Jon.

[dwalker]

There is nobody in the world who would assume that there is some affiliation with or endorsement the company that produces something I'm wearing. Well, maybe, except one - 89LT1. It's not about the emblems displayed within that picture - it's about the fact that Rochelle was, indeed, sponsored by Taran Tactical. Nothing more, nothing less. There's no reason for Geissele to issue any statement, because Rochelle had nothing to do with them. She happens to be wearing something with the company's logo featured on it.

By his logic, the company that made the pants she's wearing should make a statement. So should the company that made those bracelets. Hell, why not throw in the company that made the shooting glasses she's wearing in that video? While we're at it, Jon Bernthal and even Netflix, who produced and streamed the Punisher show should make a statement, because she's in a picture with Jon.

Thats all pretty accurate. She was there specifically as a gun bunny for TTI's booth, and that is about it. Pretty sure any other company logo on her jersey are sponsors of the TTI shooting team and not her individually.

[tanks]

doubtful she was one of taran's top shooters.

no top shooter would have that kind of opinion that one doesn't need semi-auto guns.
...

None of Taran's gun bunnies are top shooters by any definition of the word. They bring other assets to the table.

He does sponsor a few serious female shooters, but they are not the ones you'd see regularly on his IG feed.

[L84CABO]

None of Taran's gun bunnies are top shooters by any definition of the word. They bring other assets to the table.

He does sponsor a few serious female shooters, but they are not the ones you'd see regularly on his IG feed.

I guess I'm a bit confused why Taran feels he needs them. He's got his own name to trade on and makes some pretty solid products from what I've seen. But I guess the girls attract the Hollywood crowd or something.

Anyway, Colion Noir has provided comment on this issue as well if anyone is interested...

http://www.mrcolionnoir.com/and-then-there-was-rochelle-hathaway/

[caliberetta]

It's nice to see that TT immediately booted her.

That should teach her a lesson: don't be a hypocrite.

[Interpol]

What the hell is a glamour magazine doing at SHOT?

They weren't. They weren't allowed in as they didn't have the credentials.

All of the interviews were conducted at a local Vegas hotel.

[-hanko]

It's nice to see that TT immediately booted her.

That should teach her a lesson: don't be a hypocrite.

Hypocrite?

When Taran was asked if any of the Hollywood types he teaches maybe rethink their posture on the 2nd, he deleted the question.

[89LT1]

You still aren't getting it. {snip}

you are the only one who thinks Geissele needs to do/say something here.

There is nobody in the world who would assume that there is some affiliation with or endorsement the company that produces something I'm wearing. Well, maybe, except one - 89LT1. It's not about the emblems displayed within that picture - it's about the fact that Rochelle was, indeed, sponsored by Taran Tactical. Nothing more, nothing less. There's no reason for Geissele to issue any statement, because Rochelle had nothing to do with them. She happens to be wearing something with the company's logo featured on it.

By his logic, the company that made the pants she's wearing should make a statement. So should the company that made those bracelets. Hell, why not throw in the company that made the shooting glasses she's wearing in that video? While we're at it, Jon Bernthal and even Netflix, who produced and streamed the Punisher show should make a statement, because she's in a picture with Jon.

I will concede that not everyone sees this the way i do. And that's fine.

I dont think Geissele needs to say anything. My logic is based solely on being a business owner. If someone were to have an image go viral with for a negative reason and my company logo or brand name were anywhere in the picture I would want to make damn sure that people knew I had nothing to do with it. That is all i was getting at.

People that are well informed of the situation know they had nothing to do with it. When this thing makes its rounds through the anti's media circus it will still have her face, TTI and Geissele's logos on it.

but this isn't worth the discussion anymore. Taran made a good move by cutting ties very quickly. She is an idiot and i wish we could take away all her semi-autos since she thinks no one else should have them.

[protohyp]

Taran is the Ron Jeremy of the shooting world. Good at what he does...shoots his gun with precision aim and has lots of hot women around him. Move on.

[Never Convicted]

^ LOL !

[heidad01]

This. ^^