Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Magazine or Clip

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #76
    Win231
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2015
    • 2099

    HAHA. I just remembered having lunch with a group of people last year. The group included one of those "corrector" types. Someone brought up the subject of cooking, discussing some type of baking technique. The "corrector" immediately said, "Cooking is not baking." I couldn't resist (while trying not to laugh). I asked, "what about frying, boiling & steaming; are they also not considered cooking?" He actually went on & on, explaining the difference.

    Comment

    • #77
      Mitch
      Mostly Harmless
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Mar 2008
      • 6580

      I just answered a post where the guy used "interfamilial" when he meant "intrafamilial." I let it pass.

      What is happening to me?
      Originally posted by cockedandglocked
      Getting called a DOJ shill has become a rite of passage around here. I've certainly been called that more than once - I've even seen Kes get called that. I haven't seen Red-O get called that yet, which is very suspicious to me, and means he's probably a DOJ shill.

      Comment

      • #78
        Two Shots
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2007
        • 2022

        Originally posted by MosinVirus
        I look at it differently...

        Would any of you call these - magazines:


        No, I call them "Bullet Holders"
        "I have a love interest in every one of my films - a gun."
        - Arnold Schwarzenegger

        Comment

        • #79
          The Gleam
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Feb 2011
          • 13114

          Originally posted by xxINKxx
          Right when I first signed up for calguns before I was super into guns, I became friends with a group of cal gunner through a friend of mine and went to the range and accidentally called some pistol mags clips. I was still a noob and used to hearing people say clips so it slipped...

          Man they got super *** butthurt and lectured me about calling the mags clips. Like all serious and offended. I'll never forget that, and is probably why i dont care to meet up with anyone off here anymore lol

          I can careless what people call it as I know what they are talking about.

          So you care a bit, if you can care less - right?

          Couldn't resist.
          -----------------------------------------------
          Originally posted by Librarian
          What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

          If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1