It's amusing to me when people make a big deal out of using the wrong term for a magazine - calling it a "clip." Some gun shops have a poster on the wall with photos of clips & magazines with the caption: "Which do you want?"
I was browsing through an old issue of "American Handgunner" from September/October 1978. On page 5, there is an ad for Beretta pistols.
It reads: "Our heavy duty M92 9mm is the choice of law enforcement agencies around the world. Sixteen shots quick, it holds 15 staggered cartridges in the same length as traditional magazines--and another shell in the chamber ready to fire. To reload, just slip in another clip."
Maybe back then, "clip" was the proper term for "magazine," so should we really make a big deal out of people still using the term?"
And, calling a live cartridge a "shell" is also wrong. The shell is only the case...
I know, cool story, bro.
I was browsing through an old issue of "American Handgunner" from September/October 1978. On page 5, there is an ad for Beretta pistols.
It reads: "Our heavy duty M92 9mm is the choice of law enforcement agencies around the world. Sixteen shots quick, it holds 15 staggered cartridges in the same length as traditional magazines--and another shell in the chamber ready to fire. To reload, just slip in another clip."
Maybe back then, "clip" was the proper term for "magazine," so should we really make a big deal out of people still using the term?"
And, calling a live cartridge a "shell" is also wrong. The shell is only the case...
I know, cool story, bro.










Comment