35% fee for not passing background check?

[SloChicken]

At the same time, I'm not sure if pissing off a person who can't pass a background check is necessarily a good idea...

Why? You can always dial 911 if you get attacked. The police will save you.


Bwahahahaha !!!!

ROFLMAO

[SloChicken]

The question I have is... if you have a record that flags you for a background check, why are you even in the market to buy guns?

Not following you.

To my understanding everyone gets a ncis review when purchasing a firearm in CA.

[Mitch]

The question I have is... if you have a record that flags you for a background check, why are you even in the market to buy guns?

Are you new around here? Non-prohibited people are being denied and delayed right and left these days.

[dpr]

If you fail the background check it's not the sellers fault. If you don't agree to the terms don't agree to purchase the gun. Very simple...

[M1NM]

35% * $2000 = $700. That's a lot.

No different than an FFL charging 10-30% for a cancelled transaction.
Remember the seller going and getting the gun back is optional for him. He can easily just walk away and the FFL then surrenders the gun to LE for destruction.

[husdat]

No different than an FFL charging 10-30% for a cancelled transaction.
Remember the seller going and getting the gun back is optional for him. He can easily just walk away and the FFL then surrenders the gun to LE for destruction.

I dont get it. If it does not go through, the gun is confiscated and destroyed?

[Cokebottle]

I dont get it. If it does not go through, the gun is confiscated and destroyed?

If it does not go through AND if the seller does not retrieve it, then yes, the FFL is required to surrender it to LE.

As stated above, the buyer does have the option of negotiating something with the FFL to arrange for another buyer or transfer to a person in another state.