Dwalker and others can “hate” the NRA for whatever perceived error or lack of specific action they choose to identify. It is important to keep in mind, that the NRA if the only national organization that “walks” the halls of congress. If the NRA was so ineffective, why do the anti’s and the news media constantly attack the NRA?
Just because the NRA does not fight exactly as some think, does not mean they are not an effective 2nd amendment advocacy organization. There is no legitimate reason for any gun owner to not be a member of and financially support the NRA.
To not support the NRA is naive at best and is exactly what Hillary, Schumer and the million mom’s, etc., want.
There is a very big difference between choosing not to be a member of the NRA for personal reasons and openly attacking them for perceived issues.
Just because the NRA does not fight exactly as some think, does not mean they are not an effective 2nd amendment advocacy organization. There is no legitimate reason for any gun owner to not be a member of and financially support the NRA.
To not support the NRA is naive at best and is exactly what Hillary, Schumer and the million mom’s, etc., want.
There is a very big difference between choosing not to be a member of the NRA for personal reasons and openly attacking them for perceived issues.

Comment