Bullet Button Ban?

[ordc]

The Second Amendment says that the government cannot infringe the right to keep and bear arms. They've ignored that.

I think this the whole point of Calguns.

Reading this thread, or that thread, etc. this law, that law, etc. . .

You know N. Korea has a constitution guaranteeing even more rights than than US. In the end, it is all just words. I HATE when I hear or read the US constitution is a living document subject to interpretation. No its not! It says what it says. And it has a process, albeit extremely difficult (and for good reason), to amend it to change those words.

In the end, it all comes down to enforcement. Reason I do not like cops? Too many of them relish the opportunity to enforce what I view as unconstitutional laws.

Have to understand something. California is a toilet bowl. Who comes here? Foreign people that come from toxic countries that buy the lies of politicians. Politicians talks about personal responsibility and freedom, they do not want that. If they had their way, they would live in a feudal system under a lord who will give them things in return for doing some work.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Merc1138]

I for one am for it. I hate bullet buttons. Bullet buttons were another pointless government overreach. If they get banned I will be the first one to remove them from all my rifles and mail then (the bullet buttons not the rifles) to Moonbeam.

Uhh, you know that the government didn't mandate them... right? First, you can still go featureless(which is honestly more important with limited mag capacity anyway), and bullet buttons were a way to give the finger to our crappy government.

[wpod]

If they believe they can ban large capacity magazines that were legally purchased without compensation, they will believe they can ban rifles that were legally purchased without compensation. They clearly believe the former, so I predict there will be no re-opening of the registry, and no grandfather provision.

My bet is they will allow some time to sell them out of state or turn them in.

So where does the money come from for the .gov to compensate? Taxpayers. So we pay to buy objects, pay tax on the sale, so that out
r tax money goes to buying them again.
Pay twice to lose the product.

[Angrysnarf]

10 day waiting period removal better no?

[ColdDeadHands1]

It makes sense to ban bullet buttons, especially after the San Bernardino mooslim rats used them on their AR's with their 10rd mags to butcher all those people...

[bountyhunter]

I don't know if anybody else has seen it, but last night I saw an anti-bullet button TV commercial. I think it was a reporter? Either way, he basically spoke to the camera and flat out said we need to ban the bullet button in CA and close this "loophole."

Anybody else see it?

If it is the KPIX 5 commercial, yes I saw it.

[Cnynrat]

So where does the money come from for the .gov to compensate? Taxpayers. So we pay to buy objects, pay tax on the sale, so that out
r tax money goes to buying them again.
Pay twice to lose the product.

I don't think they believe they need to compensate owners. They didn't in NY and CT. They haven't compensated in cities in CA where they have banned so-called high capacity magazines that were previously legal.

Apparently, as a firearms owners not only do we not really have our full 2nd amendment rights, but we also don't have our full 4th amendment rights either

[FourT6and2]

If it is the KPIX 5 commercial, yes I saw it.

I think that was it, yeah.

[Jimi Jah]

Will ignore, like other laws. Mind your business, keep a low profile and act logically and you will have no problems.

Let the mall ninja's be the court cases.

[bountyhunter]

I think that was it, yeah.

The KPIX 5 commercial is just trying to make hay off the fact that a couple of years ago they announced that the "bullet button" allowed people to "get around" California's assault weapons ban. First off, Kali didn't ban them just restricted their features and the button was in compliance so everything KPIX is saying is wrong.

Further, they claim the guns used in San Bernadino were legal which is a flat out lie. They were modified.

Just about everything in that commercial is wrong.... what a surprise.

[71MUSTY]

Uhh, you know that the government didn't mandate them... right? First, you can still go featureless(which is honestly more important with limited mag capacity anyway), and bullet buttons were a way to give the finger to our crappy government.

Shhhh I'm on to something here.