Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Need opinion on Smith & Wesson Shield

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #61
    slayer61
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2014
    • 1402

    Originally posted by faris1984
    You gotta be kidding me right?7.5 yd and this mess..I'm talking about 15 yd which I couldn't shoot where I aim and guess what when I shoot my LCP which is smaller it was alot better than the shield not mention better in conceal as well.
    Glad to hear that you're a better shot than me faris. I was pretty happy with my results considering I had been shooting about 3 months.
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    Paul

    Confirmed Domestic Terrorist & NRA Member


    Bobby Sands

    Comment

    • #62
      kustomkat1950
      airplane guy/Coastal GA
      CGN Contributor
      • Mar 2011
      • 1774

      Love my Shield. Buy it!
      "When the system breaks down, you get to vote from the rooftops. Its one of the last best traditions of western enlightenment"

      "This was an IQ test/science experiment of Josef Mengele proportions, and the public willingly lapped it up. And many failed". (me, on Wuhan flu, 2022)

      Question EVERYTHING.

      "Sure buddy. Whatever you say. Whatever you gotta tell yourself to sleep at night"

      Comment

      • #63
        anonymous308
        • Feb 2015
        • 572

        Originally posted by slayer61
        Glad to hear that you're a better shot than me faris. I was pretty happy with my results considering I had been shooting about 3 months.
        Slayer there are a quite a few threads on other forums about the sights being off from the factory. I am sure the gun itself is accurate assuming the sights are aligned correctly. I cant even get it on paper half the time and I am not a half bad shooter.

        Will update after I adjust the sights.

        Comment

        • #64
          Bluesman
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2013
          • 498

          $345 online at Impact guns, but not Cal compliant.

          But we can surf and ski.....

          Comment

          • #65
            sactoman
            Member
            • Mar 2010
            • 371

            I have owned and shot both 40 and 9 versions a lot. Sold the 40. I am much more proficient with the 9. I was anticipating the recoil too much with 40. I recommend the 9.

            Comment

            • #66
              faris1984
              Senior Member
              • May 2013
              • 2387

              Originally posted by anonymous308
              Slayer there are a quite a few threads on other forums about the sights being off from the factory. I am sure the gun itself is accurate assuming the sights are aligned correctly. I cant even get it on paper half the time and I am not a half bad shooter.

              Will update after I adjust the sights.
              I guess this is why my shield shot awfully.

              Comment

              • #67
                faris1984
                Senior Member
                • May 2013
                • 2387

                Originally posted by slayer61
                Glad to hear that you're a better shot than me faris. I was pretty happy with my results considering I had been shooting about 3 months.
                Thanks , I been shooting since I was very young but for 3 months and your target it's awesome actually not mention it's a small pistol but just like the other said it is my pistol has the sight off from factory so I blame it on the shield because I didn't know there are some shield sights came off from the factory.Enjoy shooting it and stay safe.

                Comment

                • #68
                  calnovice
                  Junior Member
                  • Oct 2015
                  • 15

                  Got 9mm shield though maybe revolver better for me

                  I got 9mm Shield recently and wish I had actually handled one in a store before buying it. It seems too heavy for me. I find it requires a lot of muscle to pull the slide back. And I don't have muscle or finger strength to load either magazine that came with it beyond three. Did some web research and found complaints about what one critic calls the "10,000 lb spring". Wrote S&W co., using their online email form, about the tough spring ten days ago and got no reply back. I seriously debated returning the gun to Impact and exchanging for a revolver, which seems a much easier gun for a man with weak hands like myself. Further research shows some guys using a mag loader to fill this gun's mags painlessly, and Youtube has demos, so I ordered one called Maglula. The loaded chamber indicator on top a nuisance though a safety feature. It esthetically breaks the top line of the gun. I may not get to shoot mine till new year when I take a class. I worry that I may end up selling it to get a light weight, easy to load ugly revolver. Since prices mentioned above, I bought it from Impact at $412 in early Oct 2015. Look on S&W web for "Important Consumer Safety Alert" on recent Shields ("All M&P Shield firearms manufactured before Aug 19, 2013").

                  Comment

                  • #69
                    jwb28
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 568

                    Originally posted by Bangzoom
                    I got the 40 and can convert to 9mm
                    I don't think S&W is selling barrels to anyone anymore

                    Comment

                    • #70
                      jwb28
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 568

                      Originally posted by calnovice
                      I got 9mm Shield recently and wish I had actually handled one in a store before buying it. It seems too heavy for me. I find it requires a lot of muscle to pull the slide back. And I don't have muscle or finger strength to load either magazine that came with it beyond three. Did some web research and found complaints about what one critic calls the "10,000 lb spring". Wrote S&W co., using their online email form, about the tough spring ten days ago and got no reply back. I seriously debated returning the gun to Impact and exchanging for a revolver, which seems a much easier gun for a man with weak hands like myself. Further research shows some guys using a mag loader to fill this gun's mags painlessly, and Youtube has demos, so I ordered one called Maglula. The loaded chamber indicator on top a nuisance though a safety feature. It esthetically breaks the top line of the gun. I may not get to shoot mine till new year when I take a class. I worry that I may end up selling it to get a light weight, easy to load ugly revolver. Since prices mentioned above, I bought it from Impact at $412 in early Oct 2015. Look on S&W web for "Important Consumer Safety Alert" on recent Shields ("All M&P Shield firearms manufactured before Aug 19, 2013").
                      Small light weight revolvers are not easy to shoot. The sight radius is still a problem. And for every ounce you shave in weight, you pay for in recoil.
                      They are easier to load though

                      Comment

                      • #71
                        CessnaDriver
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 10754

                        Originally posted by faris1984
                        You gotta be kidding me right?7.5 yd and this mess..I'm talking about 15 yd which I couldn't shoot where I aim and guess what when I shoot my LCP which is smaller it was alot better than the shield not mention better in conceal as well.
                        For the job the shield is accurate to do it.
                        Last edited by CessnaDriver; 11-08-2015, 12:56 PM.


                        "Yeah, like... well, I just want to slap a hippie or two. Maybe even make them get jobs."

                        Comment

                        • #72
                          kriller134
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2011
                          • 1302

                          Thinking about picking up a 9mm for future carry. Would modifying the LCI be a no no under the terms of ccw? I'm thinking it would be a no no and that's what is keeping me from getting one.

                          Comment

                          • #73
                            JDay
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 19393

                            Originally posted by kriller134
                            Thinking about picking up a 9mm for future carry. Would modifying the LCI be a no no under the terms of ccw? I'm thinking it would be a no no and that's what is keeping me from getting one.
                            Depends on the IA. And state law says all restrictions must be printed on the physical CCW.
                            Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace. -- James Madison

                            The Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms. -- Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 86-87 (Pearce and Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)

                            Comment

                            • #74
                              Soginator
                              Senior Member
                              • Mar 2013
                              • 1696

                              I have a shield, EMP, and defender for carry. The shield is the least accurate, but also the least expensive and the thinnest out of all of those. I'd also say it shoots well enough for a CCW gun, seeing as how you're not going to have to shoot very far if you do have to use it.
                              WTS HK USP45c http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s....php?t=1304283

                              Comment

                              • #75
                                kriller134
                                Senior Member
                                • Jan 2011
                                • 1302

                                Originally posted by JDay
                                Depends on the IA. And state law says all restrictions must be printed on the physical CCW.
                                Thanks for your reply. I'm in orange county and the term

                                8M: restrictions by act possessing an altered weapon from its originally approved design.

                                It's so broad that it's making me interpret it as any kind of changes to the weapon is restricted.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1