Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Got a call from Consumer Affairs...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GuyW
    Banned
    • Dec 2002
    • 4298

    Originally posted by masameet
    Now why would you call mall security "idiot mall ninjas"? They're providing security for a private place of business. They're doing their job. No firearm openly carried belongs there, unless it's on the belt of a LEO. Wouldn't you agree?
    Sorry, you have lost your way in the internet: This is NOT the Brady forum....

    .

    Comment

    • GuyW
      Banned
      • Dec 2002
      • 4298

      Originally posted by 45DAVID1
      I understand your reasoning but to post ALL rules would be absurd and the list would be never ending. I'm sure the mall has never had any issues with people wanting to OC in the mall so you might suggest that they post more signs in visible locations. Send the mall reps an offcial letter requesting that they do so in order to prevent incidents like the one you had.

      Could you actually see the mall posting up rules such as "no masterbation allowed in any area of the mall, sex is prohibitted at this mall, no taking off your pants in any location other than dressing rooms"? Such rules are common sense.
      Public nudity etc is illegal IIRC.

      How's that logically relate to exercising rights?
      .

      Comment

      • AaronHorrocks
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2007
        • 1944

        Originally posted by Paratus et Vigilans
        McVeigh murdered innocent people.
        The U.S. Government murdered innocent people.
        So has the German government, the Vietnamese government, the Chinese government, the Korean government, the Soviet government...

        We can do this all day long. Governments have slaughtered millions in the 20th century. Communist governments alone account for over 100 million murdered "innocents".

        What the U.S. Government did in Waco was murder innocent people. Over what? A few unpaid property tax dollars that's unconstitutional to begin with? Did they have the chance to fight it in court? I saw the tanks on TV myself, it was a slaughter.

        200 years ago we had a "Boston Massacre" that fueled the revolution. Someone fights back in recent history, and it's called a terrorist? I guess Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, and all the rest were considered terrorists to the British too.
        Originally posted by nick
        Are there any times when you don't have a loaded firearm within reach?
        Originally posted by M. Sage
        I support violence against communists.

        Comment

        • 45DAVID1
          Banned
          • Oct 2007
          • 12145

          This thread has taken a major detour from what it was supposed to be... someone please kill it already!

          Comment

          • pullnshoot25
            Banned
            • Mar 2007
            • 8068

            Originally posted by GuyW
            I would prefer our side to call it by the proper, non-spin, non-pejorative terminology:

            "properly understanding all the inticacies of the laws".

            .
            Much better stated, thank you GuyW.

            Comment

            • Paratus et Vigilans
              In Memoriam
              • Nov 2006
              • 1510

              Originally posted by elsensei
              Oh, stop it. I understand if you don't condone what McVeigh did. I'm not saying I condone it either. I understand his actions, assuming it wasn't some false flag event. But to say "We make changes at the ballot box" in the face of the past debacle between CFR Big Government anti-gun liberal pro-fiat-currency immigration amnesty "change washington" Anti-Constitution McCain and CFR Big Government anti-gun liberal pro-fiat-currency immigration amnesty "change washington" Anti-Constitution Obama is just stupid.
              Thanks for calling my post "stupid."

              If that's how you really, truly feel, then you really ought to get off your *** and, instead of posting here, go blow up a government building and call it revolution. Saying you don't condone it but that you understand it is just psychobabble BS.

              If you don't like your government, vote it out. Take it back. Blowing up federal employees and their kids is plain and simple murder, and the first step to anarchy. The Founding Fathers weren't anarchists or terrorists and didn't revolt against the King lightly. They did everything they could to work within the system before it went where it ultimately went. They didn't have a vote. We do.
              sigpic
              Paratus et Vigilans

              Prepared and On Guard
              "A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take from you all you have." - Gerald R. Ford

              Comment

              • Paratus et Vigilans
                In Memoriam
                • Nov 2006
                • 1510

                Originally posted by AaronHorrocks
                200 years ago we had a "Boston Massacre" that fueled the revolution. Someone fights back in recent history, and it's called a terrorist? I guess Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, and all the rest were considered terrorists to the British too.
                No, actually they were considered treasonous. The "Boston Massacre" wasn't what fueled the revolution, which started way before the Declaration of Independence or the actual exchange of gunfire with British troops. What fueled the revolution was the Crown taxing the colonies relentlessly to pay for England's wars in Europe, and the refusal of the Crown to recognize and respond to the petitions of the colonies.

                Don't try to equate Waco with the American Revolution, or the stupid things Janet Reno caused there with nation states going to war, or for that matter the things the Hitler and Mussolini and Stalin and Tojo did to what the Allies' did in WW II. That kind of simplistic attempt at moral equivalency is false and intellectually bankrupt.

                You think McVeigh was a righteous revolutionary and not a murdering scum terrorist? Then follow in his footsteps. He blew up a truck full of fertilizer and killed a bunch of people trying to live their lives, and ran like the yellow coward he was. I hope he's rotting in hell this very minute. Join him if you like, but don't try to apologize for him or his acts. He was no patriot, sir. He was a coward and a murderer.
                sigpic
                Paratus et Vigilans

                Prepared and On Guard
                "A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take from you all you have." - Gerald R. Ford

                Comment

                • Theseus
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 2679

                  Nothing to see here. . . Move along.

                  Comment

                  • Vin496
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 8804

                    Originally posted by Theseus
                    +1

                    I could see this thread being used in an antigun news reports, about the extremist that frequent these site.

                    Kind of scary to think we have some here that think Mcveigh is a martyr and a true Patriot.
                    I think it can be confirmed that an alien xenomorph is absolutely no match for good ole' Alabama black snake!

                    and

                    If you're in a survival movie and the hot blond twists her ankle and can't walk, you damn well figure a way to carry her. If it's a dude, you shake his hand and say "best of luck".

                    Comment

                    • Paratus et Vigilans
                      In Memoriam
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 1510

                      Originally posted by Theseus
                      Put the thread down and step away from it, and no one will get hurt!
                      sigpic
                      Paratus et Vigilans

                      Prepared and On Guard
                      "A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take from you all you have." - Gerald R. Ford

                      Comment

                      • elsensei
                        Member
                        • Apr 2008
                        • 184

                        Oh for pete's sake. Paratus, do you also believe that "they hate us because we're free"?
                        what is this, Russia?

                        The only legitimate use of a gun is to save lives.

                        Originally Posted by N6ATF
                        "Screw them, and screw their little dog too."

                        Comment

                        • Paratus et Vigilans
                          In Memoriam
                          • Nov 2006
                          • 1510

                          Originally posted by elsensei
                          Oh for pete's sake. Paratus, do you also believe that "they hate us because we're free"?
                          What I believe is that this is America, not some Banana Republic, and not the Third Reich. I believe in the Constitution of the United States of America. I believe in the power of the vote, and the power of the people. I do not beleive in blowing up federal buildings and killing innocent people if I am unhappy with the government. I believe that the government and law enforcement work for me, not vice versa, and that if either of them ever forget that fact, the ballot box and the courthouse will be my remedies before I turn to my rifle, and while I don't ever expect to have to turn to my rifle as a remedy in this country, it's there if I need it.
                          sigpic
                          Paratus et Vigilans

                          Prepared and On Guard
                          "A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take from you all you have." - Gerald R. Ford

                          Comment

                          • M. Sage
                            Moderator Emeritus
                            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                            • Jul 2006
                            • 19759

                            Originally posted by masameet
                            Now why would you call mall security "idiot mall ninjas"? They're providing security for a private place of business. They're doing their job. No firearm openly carried belongs there, unless it's on the belt of a LEO. Wouldn't you agree?
                            I disagree strongly. If the mall doesn't want privately-owned guns, they're welcome to post a sign (and I'll refuse to shop there, ever, even though I don't OC or CCW.. yet) and kick people out for violating their rule. That's fine, it's private property and they have the right to set the rules as they see fit. However... that does not include "arresting" someone for breaking a rule. You cannot arrest people for that, only for breaking the law. Calling them idiot mall ninjas fits, IMO, because they illegally detained a law-abiding free man.

                            I'm sorry, but it sounds like you've been fed too much of the "GUNS R 4 COPZ" koolaid. Time to spend a couple years outside California and change your perspective.

                            Originally posted by masameet
                            And for that matter, why isn't the OP an "OC idiot"? He's walking onto private property without the owner's permission to OC. He's like a big kid, walking around and hoping somebody tells him, You can't bring that in here. lol
                            He'd have probably reacted a lot differently if they'd said that to him. But that's not what happened. He wasn't told to leave it in the car, he wasn't told to leave it at home, he wasn't asked to leave or banned for life.

                            Originally posted by masameet
                            If he's so in fear of his own life, maybe he should just stay home, bar the front door, and keep all his guns and ammo in front of him.
                            I agree. And you should stop driving. I mean, if you've got to have things like airbags, ABS and seatbelts in your car, you're definitely too scared to be on the road.

                            Originally posted by Vin496
                            Kind of scary to think we have some here that think Mcveigh is a martyr and a true Patriot.
                            I need to try and stay on-topic, but I'll stray and agree 100%. I've met some of McVeigh's old buddies in the Michigan Militia. They're morons. Hopeless morons. And they're *******s, too. Trust me; there is nothing to idolize in that group of retards.

                            I'm sorry, I shouldn't have said that last bit. It was unkind to retards.
                            Last edited by M. Sage; 12-12-2008, 6:37 PM.
                            Originally posted by Deadbolt
                            "We're here to take your land for your safety"

                            "My Safety?" *click* "There, that was my safety"
                            sigpicNRA Member

                            Comment

                            • aileron
                              Veteran Member
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 3272

                              Originally posted by Vin496
                              Kind of scary to think we have some here that think Mcveigh is a martyr and a true Patriot.
                              I think neither....

                              He was a criminal, acting as a rebel at best. But not a terrorist. Plain as day to me.

                              It is dangerous to allow governments to reclassify actions into simplified words that instill fear in people and allow the govt to do things to people that would not normally be condoned.

                              Assault weapon ring a bell.
                              Look at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattles, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction... Mark Twain

                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              • M. Sage
                                Moderator Emeritus
                                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                                • Jul 2006
                                • 19759

                                Originally posted by aileron
                                It is dangerous to allow governments to reclassify actions into simplified words that instill fear in people and allow the govt to do things to people that would not normally be condoned.

                                Assault weapon ring a bell.
                                Terrorist has a dictionary definition:

                                the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion… See the full definition

                                (one who participates in) the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion
                                Perhaps we should be more concerned with the media and society attaching a moral value to terms that shouldn't have one attached to it. A terrorist could be good or bad, depending on who s/he's terrorizing.
                                Originally posted by Deadbolt
                                "We're here to take your land for your safety"

                                "My Safety?" *click* "There, that was my safety"
                                sigpicNRA Member

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1