Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Active Shooting Downtown Charleston SC - Multiple Dead

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chiefblackbeard
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 40

    Originally posted by Noble Cause
    In addition, you ignored my response to your challenge:




    My Response:



    Source: Politifact.com Published Jun-18-2015



    Noble
    wait man I am going to respond to everything.
    regarding this link, I would put the Norway attack as a terrorist attack, it had a clear political motive and years of planning. the Swiss attack can be called a lunatic attack and I concede that Switzerland has had a higher mortality rate when counted from 2001 onwards.
    the trick with just one attack happening is this.. what is the mortality rate in such incidents in Switzerland for the last 5 years - 0
    last 10 years 0
    US ? still about the same right?
    not to mention that Switzerland has the same free access to guns as America!
    Finland has a greater rate and that is a proper crazy shooting.

    what about the last 30

    Originally posted by chiefblackbeard
    you are right about the motor vehicle and most people will admit that cars cause deaths but we are willing to risk losing as many people to motorvehicle accidents because of the value they provides to our lives, and the lives they sometimes save. my point is we must agree that guns result in the death of some people every year that wouldn't have died if the access to guns was more restricted but we are willing to risk those many lives for the value they provide us and the people they sometimes save.
    also you have a test that you must pass and have a certain level of physical and mental fitness before you can drive a car. something similar must apply to guns.

    Sent from my Grand S Lite using Tapatalk
    Originally posted by Noble Cause
    In addition, you ignored my response to your challenge:




    My Response:



    Source: Politifact.com Published Jun-18-2015



    Noble
    Originally posted by Noble Cause
    In addition, you ignored my response to your challenge:




    My Response:



    Source: Politifact.com Published Jun-18-2015



    Noble
    Originally posted by Noble Cause
    In addition, you ignored my response to your challenge:




    My Response:



    Source: Politifact.com Published Jun-18-2015



    Noble

    Sent from my Grand S Lite using Tapatalk

    Comment

    • chiefblackbeard
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2015
      • 40

      Originally posted by Sigbird
      That's why you and the rest of the anti gunners will never get it. Restrictions will never work if I can drive to any ghetto in America and by a gun within an hour, if I wanted to commit a massacre. Do you have any idea how many ghost guns come in from Mexico every week with there serial number scratched out? The media never mentions this. Banning and restricting isn't the answer and it will never be. You must be glued to the tv when the President and Hillary speak, because you are brain washed like the rest of the fools.
      you know what the price of those guns would be? I am guessing our guy with the **** haircut couldn't afford it without getting sane. that is with proper controls in place.
      in the current climate, the government taking a little step that has an easy bypass is just to appease the people and give them the feeling that the government is doing something, when the mess is actually too big to clean

      Sent from my Grand S Lite using Tapatalk
      Last edited by chiefblackbeard; 06-24-2015, 4:49 AM.

      Comment

      • chiefblackbeard
        Junior Member
        • Apr 2015
        • 40

        Originally posted by chiefblackbeard
        you are right about the motor vehicle and most people will admit that cars cause deaths but we are willing to risk losing as many people to motorvehicle accidents because of the value they provides to our lives, and the lives they sometimes save. my point is we must agree that guns result in the death of some people every year that wouldn't have died if the access to guns was more restricted but we are willing to risk those many lives for the value they provide us and the people they sometimes save.
        also you have a test that you must pass and have a certain level of physical and mental fitness before you can drive a car. something similar must apply to guns.

        Sent from my Grand S Lite using Tapatalk
        above is what I want to say about the number of victims being lower than xyz case.
        Originally posted by Noble Cause
        I went back and read that section in your post again, I stand corrected.

        In my defense, you tend you use run on sentences
        that make it hard to read your longer posts.

        Still, I would like a response regarding my other points in my post.


        Noble

        Sent from my Grand S Lite using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • _TomT_
          Veteran Member
          • Jun 2013
          • 3354

          Originally posted by chiefblackbeard
          glad you respect other people's right to their lifestyle choices.
          i came to this forum before this incident happened. I didn't come to mess it up unless you believe I somehow knew this was going to happen.
          however, when someone empties 6 magazines of freedom into innocent victims, I feel the need to come out with honest views rather than tribal dogma.




          Sent from my Grand S Lite using Tapatalk
          Aww its okay, I'm sure we don't care enough about your opinions or take you seriously anyways.
          Last edited by _TomT_; 06-24-2015, 1:45 PM.

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1